Acquiring the Japanese and Korean trademark rights to THE NORTH FACE (1995)
What was bought was not goods but the right to decide
The money paid in 1995 went not to inventory or plant but to the authority to decide what would be made in Japan and Korea. The North Face was selling perfectly well under the import agency arrangement, so buying the rights was not an investment in near-term sales. What told, later, was the ability to originate items the home product plan would never carry — down jackets worn in the city, backpacks used for commuting. The same procedure was followed with Ellesse in 1990 and Helly Hansen in 2016, which suggests a form the company has used repeatedly rather than a one-off idea.
But what it bought was the right to two countries, not the world. The road to carrying abroad, unchanged, a brand grown to $693.9M (¥98bn) in the year to March 2024 was closed from the outset. Goldwin has therefore turned its resources toward raising a brand under its own name, establishing Goldwin Korea Corporation in Seoul in October 2024 and opening, on 14 February 2026, the largest flagship store in the world under that brand in the same city. The 1995 judgment to place Korea alongside Japan inside the scope of the rights arrived, thirty years on, at the answer of a shop bearing not another company’s brand but its own.
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at Goldwin
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
Goldwin’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/8111/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/8111/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/8111/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/8111/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/8111/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/8111/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/8111/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/8111/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/8111/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/8111/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/8111/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/8111/workforce.json | Workforce |