MIXI

Company history

Financial history 2007–2026 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
1999
Head office
Tokyo, Japan
Listed
2006
Founder
Kasahara Kenji
Revenue · FYE Mar 2026
$1.1B (¥171bn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2026
$109.4M (¥17bn)
MIXI: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1997A job board that wanted a medium of its own

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1997Kasahara Kenji launches a job-listings site while a student
  2. 1999e-Mercury founded to run Find Job !
  3. 2004mixi opens as an invitation-only social network
  4. 2005One million members
  5. 2006Renamed mixi, Inc.; TSE Mothers listing at a ¥222.1bn valuation

The company began as a student’s side project. In November 1997, while still at the University of Tokyo, Kasahara Kenji put up a job-listings site after hearing a supervisor at his part-time job complain about what print recruitment magazines charged. On the web, he reasoned, employers could revise a posting at will and search by condition, and without paper costs the listing fee could be far cheaper. He skipped a seminar trip, bought a computer, taught himself to build the site, and got it online. In June 1999 he incorporated e-Mercury to run the job site Find Job ! with ¥3 million of capital; its head office was a borrowed corner desk in the offices of Netage, whose president Nishikawa Kiyoshi — the promoter of the “Bit Valley” plan to turn Shibuya into a Japanese Silicon Valley — taught him how to run a company and later sat on his board. The firm was reorganized as a joint-stock company in October 2000.

What set the next decade in motion was an advertising bill. To grow the job site, e-Mercury paid Yahoo roughly its entire paid-in capital in advertising every month — an education in how expensive attention is to rent. Kasahara began saying he wanted a medium of his own: a service people visited daily would carry the job site’s promotion for free and sell advertising besides. In the summer of 2003, as the company argued over what that medium should be, an Indonesian exchange student on the engineering staff, Batara Eto, showed them Friendster, the US social network popular among his fellow students. Kasahara tried several American SNS designs and concluded that networking pursued as an end in itself would bore users quickly; the point was the relationships themselves, and the site had to be somewhere comfortable to sit. After about four months of development, mixi opened in February 2004.

Invitation-only growth compounded fast: one million members by August 2005, three million by March 2006, 5.7 million by the listing that September, with 800,000–900,000 diary entries written a day and roughly one in three Japanese in their early twenties said to be users. Diaries, “footprints” and communities put the word SNS into ordinary Japanese, and in February 2006 the company renamed itself after the service. The IPO on the TSE Mothers market in September 2006 was a spectacle in itself: against an offer price of $13,330 (¥2m) the shares would not trade on day one, and at the indicated bid of $27,090 (¥3m) the market capitalization reached ¥222.1 billion — more than that of Cyber Agent, its largest outside shareholder — on a company forecasting about ¥4.8 billion of revenue. “I feel the weight of the responsibility,” Kasahara said.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2007Overtaken: the smartphone that mixi missed

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2007 · unconsolidated
Revenue$44M
Net income$9M
Net margin21.2%
FY2012 · consolidated
Revenue$167M
Net income$9M
Net margin5.3%
  1. 2008Facebook, Twitter and the iPhone arrive in Japan
  2. 2010Invitation-only registration abandoned
  3. 2011Monthly users peak near 15 million; Facebook passes mixi on PC logins
  4. 2012Operating profit falls 34.9%; senior management departs
  5. 2013First operating loss since the 2006 listing

For four more years the service kept growing. Revenue rose from ¥5.2 billion in the year to March 2007 to ¥16.9 billion in the year to March 2011, carried by advertising served to feature phones, with paid revenue added from 2009 as games and other mixi apps opened the platform. Monthly users peaked at around 15 million in 2011, the largest social network in Japan. Yet even at its peak the growth looked modest beside DeNA and GREE, rivals that rode the feature-phone social-game boom past ¥100 billion in revenue.

The ground was already moving. Facebook and Twitter reached Japan in 2008, the same year the iPhone went on sale there, and users began migrating from feature phones to smartphones. Kasahara later described it as “four or five things happening at once.” Worse, mixi’s own strength had calcified: relationships formed years earlier — university friends who had since scattered into jobs — were frozen into the service while real life moved on, and the fixity itself became a barrier to use.

The company opened up in response, dropping invitations for open registration in March 2010 and effectively removing the “footprints” feature that showed who had visited your page in 2011. Both moves thinned the diary-centred communication that had been the point of mixi without giving it a clear position against newer rivals. Facebook passed it on monthly PC logins in June 2011; on smartphones, the free messaging app LINE took the ground. Feature-phone advertising revenue, once abundant, all but vanished, and operating profit fell 34.9% in the year to March 2012. In May 2012 vice-president Harada Akinori, who had come from NTT Docomo, and the executive Koizumi Fumiaki both left the board; reports that Kasahara had sounded out a sale of his stake were denied, but the rumours persisted. Revenue fell to ¥12.6 billion in the year to March 2013, and the quarter to June 2013 brought the first operating loss since the listing.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2013Monster Strike, and a ¥6.5bn bet on advertising

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2013 · consolidated
Revenue$129M
Net income$17M
Net margin13.5%
FY2018 · consolidated
Revenue$1.7B
Net income$379M
Net margin22.1%
  1. 2013Asakura Yusuke, 30, becomes president; Monster Strike launches
  2. 2014¥6.5bn public offering spent almost entirely on advertising; No. 1 on the App Store
  3. 2015Revenue jumps nine-fold to ¥112.9bn; Hunza acquired for ¥11.5bn
  4. 2016Revenue ¥208.8bn, operating margin above 40%
  5. 2018Ticket Camp closed; Kimura Koki becomes president

In June 2013 Kasahara stepped up to chairman and handed the presidency to Asakura Yusuke, the 30-year-old head of corporate planning who had joined only in October 2011, when the startup he founded was acquired. “The competitive and device environment has changed; we have to remake ourselves,” Asakura said before taking office, and turned the company toward smartphone apps and venture investment. The year to March 2014 closed at ¥12.2 billion of revenue and a ¥200 million net loss. Four months into his tenure, in October 2013, the company released a smartphone game called Monster Strike — you drag a character back and let it fly — whose real hook was that up to four people could play together in the same room. It spread by word of mouth through high-school classrooms after school. Free to play with a deliberately low paying-user ratio, it earned more as its base widened; its producer was Kimura Koki, a future president. The idea of gathering friends to play was mixi’s notion of communication, transplanted into a game.

In February 2014, with the hit still only a hint — under ¥100 million of monthly revenue and fewer than a million users — MIXI raised about ¥6.5 billion in a public offering and put nearly all of it into television advertising. The bet decided the outcome. Monster Strike topped the Japanese App Store revenue rankings in May 2014 and was approaching ¥10 billion a month by that autumn. Asakura left after a single year in June 2014 and Morita Hiroki took over. Revenue for the year to March 2015 came in at ¥112.9 billion, more than nine times the prior year, with ¥52.7 billion of operating profit; the following year reached ¥208.8 billion and ¥95.0 billion, an operating margin above 40%. Entertainment accounted for more than nine-tenths of sales. In two years an SNS company had become a games company.

Management, carrying the memory of mixi’s decline, moved immediately to escape dependence on a single title — and moved too fast. In March 2015 it paid ¥11.5 billion, its largest acquisition ever, for Hunza, operator of the ticket-resale marketplace Ticket Camp; in April, Kasahara launched the photo-sharing app Mitene (FamilyAlbum) as a new venture. Ticket Camp’s monthly gross merchandise value grew 4.5-fold in a year, to about ¥3.6 billion by the end of 2015. But resale drew mounting public anger from artists and promoters, police searched Hunza in late 2017 on suspicion of trademark violations, and the service was shut down at the end of May 2018. Morita resigned over the failure to detect and address the problem, and in June 2018 Kimura Koki — the man who had made Monster Strike — became president, introducing an executive-officer system and redefining the company as a “communication-creation company.”

Read the full history in Japanese →


2019Sports, betting, and the third change of core business

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2019 · consolidated
Revenue$1.3B
Net income$243M
Net margin18.4%
FY2026 · consolidated
Revenue$1.1B
Net income$109M
Net margin10.1%
  1. 2019Chariloto, Chiba Jets and Net Dreamers acquired
  2. 2020TIPSTAR launches; move to the TSE First Section
  3. 2022FC Tokyo acquired; renamed MIXI, Inc.
  4. 2024Improper payments found at Chariloto; mixi2 launches
  5. 2025PointsBet Holdings acquired (66.4% of voting rights)

Kimura set out to invest ¥100 billion over three to five years, naming sports and wellness as the next fields and communication as the thread joining them to everything before. In 2019 the company acquired Chariloto, an online betting service for keirin cycle racing; Chiba Jets Funabashi, the professional basketball club; and Net Dreamers, publisher of the horse-racing site netkeiba.com. It moved to the First Section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange in June 2020 and launched TIPSTAR, a keirin betting service aimed at the young and female audiences that public racing had never reached. The upfront cost was heavy — the sports segment lost ¥5.3 billion at the operating level in the year to March 2021, as advertising and user rebates failed to bring in the expected numbers — but after a shift to marketing efficiency and cost discipline, and with public racing moving online, the segment turned a ¥2.0 billion operating profit in the year to March 2025. In February 2022 MIXI took control of Tokyo Football Club, operator of the J.League side FC Tokyo, moved to the TSE Prime market in April, and in October 2022 renamed itself MIXI, Inc., putting the corporate logo where the XFLAG games brand had been on the shirts.

The base it was diversifying away from was indeed shrinking. With the domestic smartphone-game market flat, digital entertainment revenue fell from a peak of ¥195.4 billion in the year to March 2016 to ¥83.9 billion in the year to March 2026. In the third quarter of the year to March 2024 the company withdrew five Monster Strike titles for about ¥1.5 billion of cost savings, shifted away from relying on external-IP collaborations to draw players, and looked to extend the life of the ten-year-old flagship while trying overseas again with STRIKE WORLD for India. Governance was tested once more: in 2024 it emerged that Ueda Hiroo, then representative director of Chariloto, and others had improperly received more than ¥1 billion from suppliers, some of it from February 2018, before the acquisition. The investigation delayed second-quarter results by about two months and Kimura returned part of his remuneration. The company added a screening department for supplier selection and made records of supplier meetings mandatory. There was also a return to the origin: mixi2, a short-post social network launched in December 2024, passed 1.2 million registrations in a week, and Kasahara’s FamilyAlbum reached roughly 29 million cumulative users, 30–40% of them outside Japan.

The third change of core business is being attempted abroad. An Australian subsidiary became the first Japanese-owned company to obtain a betting licence there in 2024, and in September 2025 MIXI acquired PointsBet Holdings, an ASX-listed operator in Australia and Canada. The price was raised from A$352 million to A$398 million in June 2025, and the deal was finally settled through a takeover bid that secured 66.4% of the voting rights. Consolidated revenue for the year to March 2026 was ¥171.4 billion, holding a recovery that began from the trough of the year to March 2020, with the sports segment at ¥65.8 billion of revenue and ¥5.1 billion of operating profit. A medium-term vision published in May 2026 named the economy arising from time spent enjoying oneself with family and friends the “We-Time economy,” and set targets of ¥300 billion of revenue, a 20% EBITDA margin and 15% ROE for the early 2030s. From SNS to games to sports and lifestyle: for a quarter of a century this company has kept swapping out its core business while keeping the same axis — people gathering to enjoy themselves together.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2006

The Mothers listing at a ¥222.1bn valuation (2006)

What a company takes on when the price runs ahead of it

What made this listing unusual was less the money raised than the distance between the company’s actual strength and the market’s price for it. A firm with under ¥5 billion of revenue was valued above ¥200 billion, and the founder’s stake alone came to ¥100 billion. Kasahara’s remark that he felt the weight of the responsibility shows that he was watching that gap from the closest possible vantage point. The market was pricing an asset that did not yet appear in the accounts — the sheer density of time members spent on the service — and in that one can read the character of the SNS business itself.

An asset priced in advance, however, does not necessarily survive a change in the device people hold. The intensity of relationships built on invitations and diaries took another form as smartphones and real-name networks spread, and the premises of the advertising revenue changed with it. The local success or failure of the IPO matters less than the path the company took afterwards — swapping its core business out for games, then sports, then overseas betting — because that path is what reveals the true nature of what the market priced in 2006. Can a company that earns a high valuation keep rebuilding the grounds for it? This listing is the entrance to that question.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2014

Concentrating everything on Monster Strike: the ¥6.5bn offering (2014)

A company that had watched a ship sink chooses its next swing

What this decision tested was not whether the game would be a hit but how far a company could push its resources onto a single title at a time when nobody could know. In February 2014 MIXI was earning less than ¥500 million in operating profit — nowhere near able to fund ¥6.5 billion of advertising out of the operating business. It brought in outside capital, accepted that the founder’s shareholding would fall below half, and then put every yen of it into advertising, which leaves behind neither people nor technology if it fails. Holding the cash and waiting was an available option; management chose the opposite side.

What pushed them was, it seems, the company’s own memory of mixi’s decline. Having failed to change its core business in time for the shift from feature phones to smartphones, and having fallen to its first operating loss since listing, that experience worked as a reason to step forward rather than a reason to hesitate. In the month the offering was decided, Monster Strike was earning under ¥100 million a month. Two years later, the game was taking in some ¥15 billion in a single month.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2015

The ¥11.5bn Hunza acquisition — and the closure of Ticket Camp (2015)

A company in a hurry to diversify, before it learned how

Judged on the materials available at the time, the decision to buy is easy enough to understand. The problem — revenue concentrated in a single title — was clearly defined, the target business was genuinely growing, and the cash was there. What tripped the company up lay less in whether to buy than in what to watch once it had. Ticket resale is a business in which the convenience of users and the wishes of promoters and performers can collide head-on, and a buyer chasing revenue growth alone finds it hard to see that this collision is a condition of the business’s survival. A company hurrying to diversify failed to take the measure of the particular friction inside the business it diversified into.

Even so, the failure left more than a loss. Under Kimura an executive-officer system was introduced and subsidiary oversight was rebuilt. That structure was tested again when improper payments surfaced at Chariloto in 2024, leading to further measures — a screening department for supplier selection, mandatory records of meetings with counterparties. Buying a business and governing the business you bought are two different capabilities; as MIXI stacks up acquisitions in sports and overseas betting, the question left by that ¥11.5 billion in 2015 remains in the present tense.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2025

Acquiring PointsBet: into overseas betting (2025)

A third change of core business, with regulation as the premise

MIXI has swapped its core business from SNS to games and from games to sports. The PointsBet acquisition is an attempt to perform that swap a third time, abroad. Where the previous two turns were completed inside the domestic market, this one means operating, in a different jurisdiction, a business whose premise is a licensing regime and a regulator. The order of events — obtaining an Australian licence first, then proceeding to the acquisition — suggests a decision to accumulate experience of operating under regulation before buying. If what the Hunza acquisition tested was the governance of a subsidiary, what this one tests is a different kind of governance: how to keep a business sound in an unfamiliar regulatory environment.

On the numbers, too, the answer is still to come. The purchase price was raised from A$352 million to A$398 million, and A$289 million was ultimately spent to take control. In the first year, goodwill amortization pushed operating profit below the prior year’s. Management judges that the investment can be recovered, but that presumes PointsBet keeps growing in Australia and Canada. How far a business that has been confined to the frame of public racing at home can grow in markets regulated differently — unlike the 2015 acquisition, this decision will need several more years before it can be assessed.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— MIXI full history in Japanese →

  1. MIXI, Inc. — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports), including the 沿革 corporate-history section.
  2. MIXI, Inc. — earnings briefing materials and Q&A (決算説明会資料・質疑応答), 2019–2026.
  3. MIXI, Inc. — timely disclosures (適時開示).
  4. Weekly Toyo Keizai — 週刊東洋経済: 23 Sep 2006; 3 Feb 2007; 18 May 2012; 24 May 2013; 28 Nov 2014; 30 Apr 2016; 14 Jul 2018; 1 Feb 2025; 7, 14 and 28 Mar 2026.
  5. gamebiz, 3 Jun 2025 — on the PointsBet purchase price being raised to A$398 million.

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer


Data API

MIXI’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/2121/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/2121/history.json History overview
GET /api/2121/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/2121/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/2121/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/2121/executives.json Executives
GET /api/2121/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/2121/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/2121/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/2121/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/2121/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/2121/workforce.json Workforce