The ~¥1 trillion acquisition of GlobalLogic (2021)
A yardstick that overrides the “overpriced” verdict
The core of this acquisition lies in the question of which yardstick to measure the amount’s reasonableness by. A price of ten times revenue cannot escape a verdict of overpriced if only financial indicators are seen. That a board on which outside directors held the majority pressed exactly that point and pushed the executive to reconsider shows that the governance reform Hitachi advanced early was not merely a form. That what overrode the objection was not the chairman’s personal passion but the presentation of another yardstick — whether transformation was possible — is the distinctive feature of how this was settled.
That said, replacing the yardstick does not, by itself, create a guarantee that the investment will be recovered. Hitachi has the experience of once buying IBM’s hard-disk business for a large sum and letting it go within a few years. Whether GlobalLogic follows the same rut, or instead makes the turn into a digital company something certain, hangs on how far the Lumada 80-20 target is realized. It can be seen as an acquisition that deliberately entrusted the verdict — buying high or seeing ahead — to future results.
Revenue and net margin, FY2016–FY2026
Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY2021 onwards — after it was taken.
Source: securities reports
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at Hitachi
- 1953 Successive tech alliances with GE, RCA and WE — reversing the domestic-technology creed (1953)
- 2009 Emergency rebuild after Lehman and the break with the general-electric model (2009)
- 2018 Buying ABB’s power-grid business and launching Hitachi Energy (2018)
- 2019 Dissolving Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems and exiting thermal power (2019)
- 2022 Selling the listed subsidiaries and dismantling the parent-child listing structure (2022)
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
Hitachi’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/6501/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/6501/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/6501/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6501/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6501/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/6501/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/6501/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/6501/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/6501/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/6501/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/6501/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/6501/workforce.json | Workforce |