SCREEN Holdings

Company history

Founded
1868
Head office
Kyoto, Japan
Listed
1962 · TSE 7735
Founder
Ishida Saijiro
Revenue · FYE Mar 2025
$4.2B (¥625bn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2025
$664.2M (¥99bn)
SCREEN Holdings: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1868From copperplate printing to precision etching

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports & corporate yearbooks
FY1966 · unconsolidated
Revenue$6M
Net income$278K
Net margin4.8%
FY1974 · unconsolidated
Revenue$45M
Net income$2M
Net margin3.4%
  1. 1868Ishida Saijiro founds Ishida Kyokuzan Printing, a Kyoto copperplate shop
  2. 1943Dainippon Screen Manufacturing established
  3. 1953Horikawa plant opens in Kyoto — today’s head office
  4. 1962Lists on the Osaka Securities Exchange (2nd section)
  5. 1963Co-develops color-TV shadow masks with Sony

SCREEN began in 1868, in the first months after the Meiji Restoration, as a small Kyoto copperplate-printing shop — Ishida Kyokuzan Printing, founded by Ishida Saijiro to serve the sudden demand for type and print. The workshop refined its craft and by 1918 was supplying its own proprietary Ishida-brand film to printers at home and abroad. But the second-generation head, Ishida Keizo, looked at the 1920s spread of photographic printing and concluded that a business built on copperplate engraving had no future. The precision part of photographic printing — the glass screen — was imported in its entirety, and the etching it demanded was finer than anything Japanese industry could then achieve; from the moment Keizo began his own research in 1926, the work stretched on through years of trial and error.

It took eight years. In 1934 the company developed, on its own, an “etching method for halftone screens for photoengraving,” took out the patent, and won a ¥7,000 industrial-research grant from the Ministry of Commerce and Industry — a public vote of confidence in the technology’s promise. To industrialize it, it set up Dainippon Screen Manufacturing in 1937, though establishing stable mass production proved so hard that roughly twenty years passed between the decision to enter and a working line. In 1943 the operation was reorganized as a joint-stock company and began supplying glass screens for military use. That precision-etching skill — chemically cutting an exact image — is the single thread that runs, unbroken, from prewar photoengraving through television shadow masks to semiconductor equipment, tying more than 150 years of company history to one technical axis.

After the war, Dainippon Screen rebuilt around photoengraving equipment and grew with the modernization of Japan’s printing industry. It opened the Horikawa plant in Kyoto in 1953 — the site of today’s head office — and listed on the Osaka Securities Exchange in 1962. Then, in 1963, it began co-developing color-television shadow masks with Sony, carrying its etching skill into precision components for consumer electronics — the first proof, as a business, that the technology of photoengraving could be transplanted. Shadow masks were indispensable to the color CRT, and Dainippon Screen expanded alongside Sony’s television sales. Copperplate printing to photoengraving to television parts was not scattershot diversification but a continuous evolution held together by one craft — and the leap into semiconductors would sit on the same line.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1975Repurposing a craft: semiconductor equipment

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports & corporate yearbooks
FY1975 · unconsolidated
Revenue$45M
Net income-$602K
Net margin-1.3%
FY1999 · unconsolidated
Revenue$1.2B
Net income-$216M
Net margin-18.4%
  1. 1975Develops a wafer etching machine — entry into semiconductor equipment
  2. 1992WS-820L wafer-cleaning system
  3. 1994Electronics-equipment sales overtake printing equipment
  4. 1998New Taga plant — a $140.6M (¥18bn) forward bet on 300mm
  5. 1999Falls to a net loss as the silicon cycle turns down

In 1975 Dainippon Screen developed a wafer etching machine — a wet-etching tool — and began serving the semiconductor industry, starting its transformation from a printing-equipment maker into a maker of semiconductor production equipment. The three base skills it had accumulated in photoengraving — positioning, coating and surface treatment — transferred straight across to semiconductor tools, so its barrier to entry was low relative to the integrated-electronics giants also crowding in. It productized the EMW-322/411 cleaning tools in 1977 and followed with spin coaters and spin developers in 1978, quickly building a supply record inside chipmakers’ production lines.

The shift showed in the numbers. Capital spending more than quadrupled between the late 1970s and 1980 as resources were steered into semiconductor equipment, and sales grew more than sixfold across the decade to 1983. In 1994 sales of electronics equipment overtook printing equipment — the point at which the semiconductor business displaced the founding trade as the company’s mainstay. Crucially, the whole crossing was self-funded: profits earned in printing were recycled into semiconductor R&D, so the pillar of the business was swapped without recourse to outside capital. While the integrated-electronics makers who had entered alongside it struggled to make their equipment arms pay, Dainippon Screen’s ability to bankroll its own research out of the legacy business became, in the end, a source of competitive strength.

By the early 1990s it held about 22% of the cleaning-equipment market and led it, but the field was crowded with mid-size rivals, and Tokyo Electron entered in 1993. President Ishida Akira judged that the coming 300-millimeter wafer standard would decide the industry’s whole structure. In 1997 the company announced the batch-cleaning FC-3000, and in 1998 it committed $140.6M (¥18bn) to a new plant at Taga — a forward bet on first-mover position, made just as a silicon-cycle downturn was becoming real and drawing doubts inside and outside the company. The downturn duly arrived: for fiscal 1998 Dainippon Screen sank to an operating loss of $100.1M (¥13bn) and a still larger net loss. Ishida kept investing anyway, and in 2001 it opened Fab.FC-1 at Hikone and began full volume production of 300-millimeter cleaning equipment. It was the only cleaning-equipment maker able to build a dedicated 300-millimeter mass-production plant; as the weaker mid-size firms fell away, the oligopoly closed — and the downturn bet had rewritten the competitive map in its favor.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2001World leader in wafer cleaning

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports & corporate yearbooks
FY2002 · consolidated
Revenue$1.4B
Net income-$151M
Net margin-10.8%
FY2023 · consolidated
Revenue$3.3B
Net income$409M
Net margin12.5%
  1. 2001300mm wafer-cleaning equipment enters volume production at Hikone
  2. 2002Printing-equipment business split off
  3. 2014Renamed SCREEN Holdings Co., Ltd.
  4. 2022World’s top share in wafer-cleaning equipment
  5. 2023Unveils a one-trillion-yen revenue vision; concentrates investment at Hikone

With the 300-millimeter gamble paying off, Dainippon Screen made semiconductor cleaning its core and reorganized to concentrate resources there. In 2002 it split off the printing-equipment business, cutting its centuries-old founding trade loose from the parent so the company could focus on semiconductor tools. It expanded capacity at Hikone through the 2000s, and though the 2008 financial crisis pushed it back into a net loss, results recovered quickly as chip demand returned. Eiji Kakiuchi, who led the move to a holding structure, later reflected that what had pulled the company through its crises was human ties — turning yesterday’s enemies into friends — and that a business whose core had shifted from printing to CRTs to semiconductors survives by never forgetting the lessons of the past and continuing to try, even when innovation erases the very trade it lives on.

In October 2014 it renamed itself SCREEN Holdings Co., Ltd. and moved to a holding-company structure, parceling its semiconductor, graphic-arts, display-manufacturing and printed-circuit-board businesses out to operating subsidiaries. By 2022 it held roughly 48% of the world market in batch cleaning and 33% in single-wafer cleaning — the oligopoly Ishida’s late-1990s forward investment had set in motion, now fully realized as the 300-millimeter era arrived and the $140.6M (¥18bn) bet was recouped many times over. In the year ended March 2024 the company reached record results, sealing its place as the winner of the shakeout. From 1868 copperplate printing through prewar glass etching, postwar shadow masks and, from 1975, semiconductor equipment, roughly 150 years of moving one craft into successive markets had held to a single axis: chemically processing a precise image. President Toshio Hiroe, appointed in 2019, framed the goal as a tougher group built around that accumulated equipment expertise.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2024From reinvestment to shareholder returns

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports & corporate yearbooks
FY2024 · consolidated
Revenue$3.3B
Net income$465M
Net margin14%
FY2025 · consolidated
Revenue$4.2B
Net income$664M
Net margin15.9%
  1. 2024Record results; first payout-ratio policy (30%+) and a two-for-one stock split
  2. 2025Share buyback and a record annual dividend of $2 (¥308)

The company that had swapped its businesses out of its own pocket — printing profits into semiconductor equipment, never leaning on outside capital — reached a turning point in 2024, when for the first time it set a policy of returning at least 30% of consolidated profit as dividends. It split its stock two-for-one that year, carried out a buyback of up to four million shares in 2025, and lifted the annual dividend to a record $2 (¥308). The pivot redirects the cash piled up by the semiconductor boom away from reinvestment alone and toward shareholder returns.

Yet the reinvestment reflex has not gone. The medium-term plan “Value Up Further 2026” holds up a one-trillion-yen revenue target for the coming decade and rests on doing both at once — expanding capacity and returning cash. For a maker whose fortunes rise and fall with the silicon cycle, that is the standing test: to build ahead of the peak without being crushed by fixed costs when the wave recedes.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1975

Entering semiconductor equipment by repurposing photoengraving (1975)

Re-seeing the company as a combination of technologies, not products

The core of this decision was not retreat or retrenchment in the face of crisis, but aiming the technology already in hand at a different industry. In a year when a plateauing printing market and the oil shock had pushed the core business into the red, Dainippon Screen Manufacturing pointed the positioning, coating and surface-treatment skills honed in photoengraving toward the semiconductor manufacturing process then coming into being. Entering semiconductors looked like a leap in terms of products, but in terms of the technology inside it was continuous ground. Ishida Tokujiro’s reading — that even if the company could not beat the specialists head-on, it could win through the power of integration, of bringing its accumulated skills together — was a way of re-grasping its own strengths not by the names of products but by a combination of technologies.

That said, it took close to twenty years for this shift to bear fruit, and along the way came the boom-and-bust swings peculiar to semiconductors. It was largely because the company could keep channeling the profits earned by its legacy photoengraving machines into the new business that it could swap the pillar of its business without relying on outside capital. Raising the next pillar in a different industry while the existing business is still turning a profit — the 1975 entry offers one answer to the question of how a company with a mature core business should seed a new one. Layered onto it is this company’s generational experience that even when the words “photoengraving” disappear, the technology survives.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1992

Concentrating on wafer cleaning — the pivot to semiconductor equipment (1992)

Sighting the process you can win, and massing resources there

What this decision shows is the weight of choosing where to mass resources among the several hundred steps of semiconductor manufacturing. Rather than the exposure or deposition steps that make an equipment maker conspicuous, Dainippon Screen Manufacturing chose cleaning — unglamorous, but decisive for yield — as its main battlefield. The surface-treatment and liquid-handling skills honed in photoengraving carried over directly into semiconductor cleaning; continuity with the founding trade underpinned this concentration on a single point. The character of the choice shows in its refusal to spread across step after step, instead sighting the domain it could win and massing resources there.

That said, a way of fighting that bets deeply on a single process is, in reverse, one whose results swing hard with the cycle and the competition in that process. That the company, having stood first in the world in cleaning, later lost share shows the strength and the peril of concentration at once. Even so, this shift — a printing company remade into one that earns its living from semiconductor cleaning — conveys how the judgment of discerning where one’s technology lives and massing resources there can redraw the very outline of a company. Which semiconductor process to bet on — that is a question the makers still face today.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2000

The shift to single-wafer cleaning and early 300mm mass production (2000)

Defend today’s efficiency, or bet on the next technology

The core of this decision was to bet on the technological change of miniaturization and 300-millimeter wafers, gathering resources into single-wafer cleaning — washing one wafer at a time — rather than defending the mass-production efficiency of the then-mainstream batch method. Batch washing has the strength of processing many at once, but the finer the circuitry grows, the harder it is to hold uniform cleaning conditions wafer by wafer. Dainippon Screen deliberately bet on the coming technology at a time when a slumping semiconductor market had makers inclined to rein in investment. When today’s strength in efficiency collided with tomorrow’s demand for miniaturization, this was a judgment that chose the latter.

That choice was later rewarded. Single-wafer cleaning became the mainstream in advanced cleaning steps, and SCREEN came to hold the world’s top share in both single-wafer and batch cleaning equipment. The common platform built with the SU-3000 raised its throughput generation by generation — the SU-3100, the SU-3200 — and single-wafer cleaning now underpins the company’s core business. That said, the judgment can be called correct only because miniaturization went on advancing and the single-wafer advantage endured. Defend today’s mass-production efficiency, or bet on the next technology — this technology choice around the year 2000 remains an example of a company choosing early, on its own, the question the equipment industry faces again and again.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2023

A one-trillion-yen vision and concentrated Hikone investment, built on cleaning-equipment leadership (2023)

In a cyclical industry, how far to bet at the peak

The core of this decision is neither a financial crisis nor a pivot into a new business, but how far to pile capacity expansion onto peak demand in semiconductors, an industry of violent boom and bust. SCREEN carries a success it remembers well: the forward investment in 300-millimeter mass production that President Ishida Akira made during the downturn of the late 1990s, which drew rivals out of the race and brought on oligopoly. Hiroe’s move — fixing a one-trillion-yen figure for 2033, concentrating mass production at Hikone and stretching the ramp-up out ahead — can be read as extending that experience across a long time axis. The foundation of the world’s top share became the collateral underwriting a bet placed in advance.

Getting ahead has its underside. Plants and equipment built before the peak become vessels that catch demand and prevent lost sales if it grows as expected, but once the wave recedes they press on earnings as fixed costs. The record profit for the year ended March 2025 was the former at work; in a cyclical industry, the turn to the latter also comes around eventually. More than the one-trillion-yen target itself, the question is whether Goto’s new leadership can hold, across the waves, the breathing rhythm of investment — expanding on the rise, enduring on the ebb. At the time of writing the answer is not yet in. As a case for watching how the world’s leading equipment maker faces the swings of its own cycle, this decision is rich in suggestion.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— SCREEN Holdings full history in Japanese →

  1. SCREEN Holdings Co., Ltd. — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports) and earnings briefings (決算説明会).
  2. President — プレジデント (President Inc.), 14 May 2018. president.jp.
  3. Nikkei Business — 日経ビジネス (Nikkei BP), 29 Jan 2021. business.nikkei.com.
  4. Nihon Keizai Shimbun — 日本経済新聞 (Nikkei Inc.), 28 Feb 2025. nikkei.com.
  5. Dempa Shimbun — 電子デバイス産業新聞 (Electronic Device Industry News), 13 Sep 2019. sangyo-times.jp.

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →