Buying back Honeywell’s stake: the end of 49 years (2002)
It was the other side that said it wanted to sell
It was Honeywell that proposed the meeting in Hawaii, and what it put on the table was a wish to sell its shareholding. Yamatake’s work, one can say, was to translate its partner’s withdrawal into a redefinition of itself. President Ido Ichiro said the new relationship would make possible investment in new markets and new businesses, and above all the expansion of business in Asia — which, turned around, is also an admission that until then the way it could move in Asia had been bound by the frame of the alliance.
It took five years, however, to get from taking the sign down to settling the capital. Although the intention to sell was made public in October 1997, the process stalled twice on circumstances belonging to the other party and to the rules: restrictions on share buybacks, the fall in the share price after the consumption-tax increase, and AlliedSignal’s acquisition of Honeywell. Splitting the purchase between December 2000 and July 2002 was also the result of waiting for the legislation on treasury stock to be put in place. What decided how a forty-nine-year relationship ended was, to a large degree, the conjunction of law and market conditions rather than the strategies of either side.
Revenue and net margin, FY1997–FY2007
Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY2002 onwards — after it was taken.
Source: securities reports
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at Azbil
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
Azbil’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/6845/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/6845/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/6845/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6845/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6845/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/6845/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/6845/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/6845/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/6845/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/6845/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/6845/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/6845/workforce.json | Workforce |