Fifty-fifty with Honeywell — technology for equity (1953)
The price of being an equal
Against the proposal of 51%, President Yamaguchi held to fifty-fifty, saying that a management settled by cumulative voting would not make for a good partnership. There was a road on which he could have handed over control in order to obtain the technology; instead he put an equal capital structure ahead of it, as a precondition. And at the same time he pushed into the package contract the HVAC controls and microswitches that the other side was reluctant to include because Yamatake had no experience of them at all. The thinking — that even if we cannot build them yet, we can manage if we merely import and sell them — shows clearly the order of operations of a company that started out as an importer.
Equality, though, was partly a matter of form. Honeywell agreed to fifty-fifty while separately seeking a private undertaking that it would hold the exercising rights after Yamaguchi’s death — securing its control out of sight. That private agreement became a dead letter as mutual understanding deepened and was scrapped, but the equality of the starting point was not stable from the outset. Across the thirty-seven years in which the 50% shareholding lasted, Yamatake moved from acting as agent for imported goods to producing HVAC controls domestically. What insisting on equality meant can only be measured by whether the company could stand on its own once the alliance ended.
Revenue and net margin, FY1948–FY1958
Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY1953 onwards — after it was taken.
Source: securities reports
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at Azbil
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
Azbil’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/6845/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/6845/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/6845/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6845/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6845/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/6845/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/6845/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/6845/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/6845/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/6845/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/6845/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/6845/workforce.json | Workforce |