Azbil

Fifty-fifty with Honeywell — technology for equity (1953)

Key decision·1953· Azbil — the full company history →

The price of being an equal

Against the proposal of 51%, President Yamaguchi held to fifty-fifty, saying that a management settled by cumulative voting would not make for a good partnership. There was a road on which he could have handed over control in order to obtain the technology; instead he put an equal capital structure ahead of it, as a precondition. And at the same time he pushed into the package contract the HVAC controls and microswitches that the other side was reluctant to include because Yamatake had no experience of them at all. The thinking — that even if we cannot build them yet, we can manage if we merely import and sell them — shows clearly the order of operations of a company that started out as an importer.

Equality, though, was partly a matter of form. Honeywell agreed to fifty-fifty while separately seeking a private undertaking that it would hold the exercising rights after Yamaguchi’s death — securing its control out of sight. That private agreement became a dead letter as mutual understanding deepened and was scrapped, but the equality of the starting point was not stable from the outset. Across the thirty-seven years in which the 50% shareholding lasted, Yamatake moved from acting as agent for imported goods to producing HVAC controls domestically. What insisting on equality meant can only be measured by whether the company could stand on its own once the alliance ended.

Revenue and net margin, FY1948–FY1958

Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY1953 onwards — after it was taken.

Source: securities reports

Read the full dossier in Japanese →

The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.

Other key decisions at Azbil


Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer

  • This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
  • Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
  • Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
  • Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
  • Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.

Data API

Azbil’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET. Full specification →

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/6845/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/6845/history.json History overview
GET /api/6845/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/6845/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/6845/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/6845/executives.json Executives
GET /api/6845/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/6845/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/6845/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/6845/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/6845/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/6845/workforce.json Workforce