Nippon Electric Glass

Company history

Financial history 1965–2025 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
1944
Head office
Otsu, Shiga, Japan
Listed
1973
Origin
Spun off from NEC (independent 1949)
Revenue · FYE Mar 2025
$2.1B (¥311bn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2025
$197.8M (¥30bn)
Nippon Electric Glass: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1944Ninety employees, and the gaps nobody wanted

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1944Founded by NEC to make its own tube glass
  2. 1949Independent again, with ninety employees
  3. 1951Automatic tube drawing — fluorescent-lamp glass in volume
  4. 1962Vacuum-flask glass mechanised; Neoceram crystallised glass

The company began in 1944 as a subsidiary set up by NEC to make its own glass for vacuum tubes and cathode-ray tubes. The postwar dissolution of the zaibatsu separated it from the Sumitomo-affiliated parent, and when it restarted as an independent company in December 1949 it had just ninety employees — a division of a major electrical manufacturer on paper, a small enterprise in fact.

That size dictated the strategy. Architectural, automotive and container glass were large markets already held by large firms; the only opening was in special glass, where the technical difficulty was high and the entrants few. In 1951 the company succeeded in drawing tubing automatically and began mass-producing glass for fluorescent lamps; in 1960 it licensed tubing technology from Owens-Illinois of the United States to strengthen the base. Vacuum-flask glass, still blown by hand across the industry, was mechanised for volume production in 1962 and eventually reached a 100% domestic share. The pattern — take a niche the majors will not enter, then take it with machinery and volume — was set within a decade of independence, and it is the pattern that carried into everything that followed.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1964Betting the company on the picture tube

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY1965 · unconsolidated
Revenue$11M
Net income$111K
Net margin1.1%
FY1985 · unconsolidated
Revenue$742M
Net income$35M
Net margin4.7%
  1. 1963Permission granted to enter CRT glass as the second source
  2. 1964Dedicated CRT plant at Takatsuki, Shiga — $5.6M (¥2bn)
  3. 1967Colour CRT glass
  4. 1973Listed in Tokyo and Osaka
  5. 1981CRT glass reaches 54% of sales

From around 1958 the company tried to enter CRT glass for televisions, but the Japanese government withheld permission to license the technology from Owens-Illinois for six years: Asahi Glass already held the domestic market with Corning technology, and no second supplier was to be admitted. The opening came in 1963, when television demand grew fast enough that the electrical manufacturers wanted two sources rather than one. In 1964 a company with ¥300 million of capital and about ¥3.8 billion in sales committed roughly $5.6M (¥2bn) to a dedicated CRT plant at Takatsuki in northern Shiga — the whole company staked on one site.

Nagasaki Junichi, who led the decision and later became the third president, framed it plainly: a business with a consistent prospect of growth should not be judged by whether one enters early or late, and if one enters at all it must be at a scale that fits the business. The Kohoku site was chosen for room to expand, abundant industrial water, transport and a good labour supply, with the layout for future capacity drawn in from the start. In 1972 the head office itself moved from Tokyo to Otsu in Shiga.

Volume production of black-and-white CRT glass began in 1965 and colour followed in 1967. As the second source in a market Asahi Glass had monopolised, the company took on Toshiba, Matsushita, Sony, NEC and Mitsubishi Electric in turn, and by 1991 led the domestic market with a 57% share. Worldwide, patents held by Corning and Owens-Illinois left effectively no room for new entrants, which protected the position it had won. Listing followed — the second sections of the Tokyo and Osaka exchanges in 1973, the first section in 1983 — alongside a move into glass fibre in 1976. By fiscal 1981 CRT glass was 54% of sales: a components maker whose fate was tied to television, and whose concentration in CRT would weigh heavily when flat panels arrived.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1987The quiet decade that became LCD substrate glass

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY1992 · consolidated
Revenue$1.7B
Net income$47M
Net margin2.8%
FY2010 · consolidated
Revenue$3.8B
Net income$625M
Net margin16.5%
  1. 1987TFT substrate glass production begins
  2. 2000Overflow fusion process in full production
  3. 2002Korea subsidiary (Taiwan, 2003) — supply beside the panel makers
  4. 2008Peak year: $3.1B (¥368bn) in sales, 27.4% operating margin

In October 1987, with CRT still climbing toward its most profitable years, the company began producing substrate glass for TFT liquid-crystal displays. No LCD television market existed then; demand came from small monitors for notebook PCs and word processors, and the investment attracted little attention. But more than a decade of accumulated process knowledge was the reason it could move when the market finally arrived.

The decisive step came in January 2000, with full production by the overflow fusion process that Corning had pioneered and Nippon Electric Glass worked out for itself — the method that allows high-quality TFT substrate to be supplied consistently. Subsidiaries followed in Korea in 2002 and Taiwan in 2003, putting melting, forming and finishing next to Samsung, LG Display and AUO, whose concentrated purchasing demanded local supply. Customer, location and process were all shifted from CRT to flat panel at once.

The LCD television boom carried the company to its peak: consolidated sales of $3.1B (¥368bn) and operating profit of ¥100.9 billion — a 27.4% margin — in the year to March 2008, second in the world in LCD substrate glass behind Corning. Even after the post-Lehman correction, sales came within reach of that record again in fiscal 2010. CRT profits had been recycled into TFT substrate, and the cycle had worked.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2011Commoditisation, retrenchment, and the semiconductor turn

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2011 · consolidated
Revenue$4.9B
Net income$860M
Net margin17.6%
FY2024 · consolidated
Revenue$2.0B
Net income$79M
Net margin4%
  1. 2015Sales down to ¥192.6 billion — half the peak
  2. 2017PPG glass fibre business acquired; fiscal year moves to December
  3. 2019Impairment on composites — ¥33.7 billion net loss
  4. 2023Korean display sites liquidated; EGP2028 begins
  5. 2024Dinorex UTG in foldable phones; all-electric melting past half

From fiscal 2011 the substrate glass price fell as Korean, Taiwanese and Chinese panel makers brought production in-house and later entrants crowded in. By the year to March 2015 sales had dropped to ¥192.6 billion, close to half the peak, with an operating margin of 2.7%. The formula that had worked in CRT — invest ahead, supply a handful of large customers — guaranteed nothing in a display market driven by price. Under Matsumoto Motoharu, president from 2015, the company began looking for a way out of display dependence, starting support glass for semiconductors in 2016.

The most ambitious attempt was the 2017 purchase of PPG Industries’ European and US glass fibre business — three sites in the UK, the Netherlands and the United States — aimed at a place among the world’s largest fibre makers. Price competition from Chinese producers and weak European demand undercut it almost immediately; an impairment in the year to December 2019 contributed to a ¥33.7 billion net loss and exposed the structural deficit in composites. The Dutch subsidiary entered bankruptcy proceedings and left the consolidation in 2023. Meanwhile the fiscal year end had moved from March to December in 2017 to unify global reporting.

Under Kishimoto Satoru, president from June 2022, the company chose to clear the ground before growing. The Korean display sites were liquidated in 2023; fiscal 2023 closed with sales of ¥279.9 billion, an operating loss of ¥10.4 billion and a net loss of ¥26.2 billion, including impairments on Korea and on composites in Malaysia. The medium-term plan EGP2028 targets ¥400 billion of sales and a 12.5% operating margin by 2028, funded partly by ¥49 billion raised from selling non-core property. Growth is meant to come from two places: ultra-thin Dinorex UTG, an application of the overflow technology built for displays, now used in foldable phones and satellite solar-panel cover glass; and semiconductor support glass and probe-card substrates, with a glass-ceramic core substrate for advanced packaging targeted for around 2028. Behind it, the melting furnaces themselves are being converted to all-electric — from almost none in 2018 to most of the display furnaces by 2025 — cutting emissions while stabilising quality, and the know-how is now sold as an engineering service.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1964

Entering CRT glass late, with a dedicated plant at Takatsuki (1964)

Not whether the forecast was right, but how the scale was placed

Even Owens-Illinois, the technical partner, had pulled out of its new plant in New Jersey just before firing the furnace. In 1964 the future of television was not a shared view. Nippon Electric Glass nonetheless gathered about ¥2 billion into a single factory at Takatsuki in Shiga, on capital of ¥300 million and sales of ¥3.8 billion. What shows in the shape of this investment is less that the forecast proved right than the stance behind it: if a business has a prospect of growth, do not ask whether you are early or late — do it at a scale that fits it.

That stance, however, came back at the company as losses for the first two years. Black-and-white glass could not be sold because the channels were closed, and the year to March 1966 sank to lower sales and a net loss of ¥180 million; the losses continued the following year. Had the television boom not come, Nagasaki Junichi’s own assessment — that it was a rather reckless investment — might have stood as the ending. It was not the correctness of the forecast that saved the company, one can argue, but the fact that it could keep the plant running until the forecast came true.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2017

Buying PPG’s European and US glass fibre business (2017)

The aim of global scale, and the speed of the cleanup

The problem itself — breaking the dependence on LCD substrate glass — was urgent for this company. The decision to acquire PPG’s European and American operations in two stages and take a place among the world’s largest fibre makers therefore does not reduce to simply overpaying. Yet immediately after the company committed, expanded Chinese output broke the market and automotive demand failed to grow. The difficulty of this acquisition shows in the fact that a base of roughly ¥60 billion was taken on without the support of favourable conditions.

Still, it cannot be said that the price paid in fibre was wasted. Withdrawal from the United States, bankruptcy of the Dutch subsidiary, impairment in Malaysia — much of the expanded base was cleared away within a few years. The company learned first-hand the weight of narrowing two main businesses, LCD and fibre, at the same time. This experience, in which the speed of cleanup could not keep up with the speed of expansion, can be seen as what led into the structural reform that followed.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— Nippon Electric Glass full history in Japanese →

  1. Nippon Electric Glass Co., Ltd. — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports).
  2. Nippon Electric Glass Co., Ltd. — medium-term management plan EGP2028 and results materials (決算説明会資料).
  3. Nagasaki Junichi, in Senshoku Kenkyu染色研究, January 1981 (on siting the Takatsuki CRT plant).

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer


Data API

Nippon Electric Glass’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/5214/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/5214/history.json History overview
GET /api/5214/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/5214/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/5214/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/5214/executives.json Executives
GET /api/5214/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/5214/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/5214/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/5214/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/5214/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/5214/workforce.json Workforce