Selling the breadwinner memory business, now Kioxia (2017)
Selling off its earning power to survive
At the centre of this decision lies a paradox: to keep its listing, Toshiba had to turn its single most profitable business into cash. The NAND flash memory that Toshiba was the first in the world to create was earning the greater part of the group’s profit even in the depths of the crisis. That business it let go — not sold high in a boom, but surrendered while being chased by the failure of its nuclear business. The weight of this sale lies in the fact that Toshiba handed over its very power to earn in order to buy survival. Even the price of some ¥2 trillion may have been close to the ceiling a seller pressed for time could draw out.
That said, Toshiba did not part with the business entirely. By keeping 40.2% of the voting rights, it left room for a later rise in Kioxia’s corporate value to become an unrealized gain that could support Toshiba’s rebuilding. Whether the prized asset it had ostensibly let go would, in altered form, come to prop it up again rested on the memory market and Kioxia’s growth. This judgement — filling the hole of the insolvency brought on by its tilt toward nuclear power with the sale of memory — was also a moment in which Toshiba, the full-line electrical maker, was made to ask itself anew what it would keep and what it would give up. That question would drag on all the way to the 2023 delisting.
Revenue and net margin, FY2012–FY2022
Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY2017 onwards — after it was taken.
Source: securities reports
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at Toshiba
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
Toshiba’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/6502/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/6502/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/6502/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6502/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6502/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/6502/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/6502/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/6502/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/6502/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/6502/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/6502/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/6502/workforce.json | Workforce |