Nidec

Company history

Founded
1973
Head office
Kyoto, Japan
Listed
1988 · TSE 6594
Founder
Nagamori Shigenobu
Revenue · FYE Mar 2025
$17.4B (¥2.61tn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2025
$1.1B (¥164bn)
Nidec: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1973From micro-motors to a hard-disk monopoly

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports & corporate yearbooks
FY1974 · unconsolidated
Revenue$341K
Net income
Net margin
FY1990 · unconsolidated
Revenue$314M
Net income
Net margin
  1. 1973Nippon Densan founded in Kyoto by Shigenobu Nagamori
  2. 1979Starts making HDD spindle motors
  3. 1985Bets $18.9M (¥5bn) on a third Shiga plant
  4. 1988Lists on the Kyoto and Osaka exchanges
  5. 1989Buys Shinano Tokki — ~88.7% of HDD spindle motors

Nidec — then Nippon Densan — began in July 1973, when the twenty-seven-year-old Shigenobu Nagamori set up shop in Kyoto’s Nishikyo ward with capital of $7,299 (¥2m). He had meant to strike out on his own at thirty-five, but read the turmoil of the Japan-remodelling boom as a moment thick with opportunity and went independent seven years ahead of plan. He hawked his prized precision micro-motors to one Japanese maker after another and was turned away almost everywhere as too young, without credit. So he wrote off domestic sales, flew to the United States, found 3M in a telephone directory, and pitched that he could halve the size of its motors — winning a $1.8M (¥500m) order. From the first months the template was set: use an overseas track record as the lever to pry open trust at home.

That American reference did its work, and the very Japanese makers who had shut their doors began placing orders. Nagamori built out an overseas footprint early — a US arm in Saint Paul in 1976, plants across Asia and Europe through the 1980s — riding a broad tailwind as the miniaturisation and precision of motors matched the whole of Japanese manufacturing turning “lighter, thinner, shorter, smaller.” In 1979 he committed to spindle motors for the hard-disk drive, and the concentration paid off: in 1985, with a groundless rumour circulating that “Nidec is in trouble,” he answered the strength of inquiries from major customers by sinking $18.9M (¥5bn) into a third Shiga plant and pushing for volume. The company listed on the Kyoto and Osaka exchanges in 1988.

By 1989 Nidec held 72.2% of the world market for HDD spindle motors, far ahead of the number two. That March, Nagamori bought the ailing Shinano Tokki from Teac, lifting the combined share to about 88.7% — a giant of a small market. The antitrust review cleared on his pledge to preserve the acquired workforce, and the monopoly locked in. The profits it threw off, as PC demand swelled shipments, became the war chest that would fund everything Nidec did next.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1991Breaking the hard-disk habit: growth by acquisition

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports & corporate yearbooks
FY1991 · unconsolidated
Revenue$434M
Net income
Net margin
FY2003 · consolidated
Revenue$2.8B
Net income$98M
Net margin3.5%
  1. 1994Declares an aggressive M&A push; breaks from HDD dependence
  2. 1995Falls to a $26.6M (¥3bn) net loss as HDD demand dips
  3. 1998Lists on the TSE First Section
  4. 2001Lists on the New York Stock Exchange
  5. 2003Buys rival Sankyo Seiki; adopts the FDB

The monopoly’s very concentration was the danger. In the year ended March 1995 a temporary slump in PC demand cut HDD-motor orders sharply and Nidec fell to a $26.6M (¥3bn) net loss — with the hard disk then about 80% of sales, the risk of leaning on a single market had come due. Nagamori drew the lesson out loud: “the only way to win is to use time well — if a rival takes a month, we take fifteen days.” In-house development was too slow for the pace he wanted, so he pivoted to diversification led by mergers and acquisitions, aiming by around 1997 to push the HDD share of sales below a third. Listings on the Tokyo Stock Exchange’s First Section in 1998 and on the New York Stock Exchange in 2001 built the institutional base for buying without pause.

The selection rule broke with industry convention. Nagamori preferred targets that were “a dirty factory, a poor work ethic, high procurement cost” and roughly breaking even — the more correctable inefficiency a firm carried, the more that discipline alone could turn it to high profit. He signed no-layoff agreements with the unions, then ran the same three-part fix everywhere: scour the factory, rebuild work discipline, and renegotiate suppliers. Companies came in at better than two a year.

Around 2000 the HDD’s bearing was shifting from the ball bearing to the fluid dynamic bearing (FDB). Sensing that a firm which missed the transition could be finished, Nagamori went looking for the technology and bought his way onto the new curve: in 2003 he acquired the rival Sankyo Seiki, rode the FDB shift to the top of the world market, and still held around 70% of HDD motors as late as 2009.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2004A global roll-up into a comprehensive motor maker

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports & corporate yearbooks
FY2004 · consolidated
Revenue$3.0B
Net income$105M
Net margin3.5%
FY2016 · consolidated
Revenue$10.8B
Net income$826M
Net margin7.6%
  1. 2006Buys the Valeo motor-and-actuator business
  2. 2010Buys the Emerson Electric motor-control business
  3. 2013Profit falls as digital-appliance demand peaks
  4. 2014Buys Honda Elesys — an automotive base

From the mid-2000s the acquisitions went global and moved beyond the hard disk. In 2006 Nidec bought Valeo’s motor-and-actuator business to form Nidec Motors & Actuators; in 2010 it took Emerson Electric’s motor-control business to create Nippon Densan Motor; in 2012 it swept up Italy’s Ansaldo Sistemi Industriali and America’s Kinetek; and in 2014 it acquired Honda Elesys, widening its base in automotive technology. Cumulatively more than sixty deals turned a one-legged HDD structure into a comprehensive motor maker spanning automotive, home-appliance and industrial demand.

Nagamori had said the quiet part early: in a 2006 interview he forecast that by around 2014–15 automotive would become the largest core business — that the “HDD Nidec” would become the “automotive Nidec.” A 2015–16 buying spree across Europe, the Americas and Asia carried the firm into new fields, including elevators. Not that the ride was smooth: in the year to March 2013 a peak in digital-appliance demand and the Thai floods’ disruption of HDD makers cut profit hard. But that was the point of the design — to keep swapping the portfolio through M&A so that no single market could sink the whole. His pledge to “grow sales tenfold in ten years” was becoming real one acquisition at a time.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2017EV traction, industry, and the succession problem

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports & corporate yearbooks
FY2017 · consolidated
Revenue$10.7B
Net income$990M
Net margin9.3%
FY2025 · consolidated
Revenue$17.4B
Net income$1.1B
Net margin6.3%
  1. 2018Nidec PSA emotors JV — entry into EV traction motors
  2. 2019Buys the Embraco compressor business for $1.1B (¥122bn)
  3. 2021Mitsubishi Heavy machine tools become Nidec Machine Tool
  4. 2023Renamed Nippon Densan to Nidec; tender offer for TAKISAWA
  5. 2024Mitsuya Kishida becomes president
  6. 2025Accounting fraud; Nagamori resigns as representative director

In 2017 Nidec unified the group’s corporate logo under the single Nidec brand and folded in Emerson Electric’s motor-drive and generator business. The next year it made its decisive turn into EV traction motors: the 2018 joint venture Nidec PSA emotors, with France’s PSA, took the company from small precision motors into the drive motors that move electric vehicles. In 2019 it bought Whirlpool’s Embraco compressor business for $1.1B (¥122bn) and took over Omron’s automotive-electronics operations to form Nidec Mobility. Nagamori was blunt about why: in cars, unlike IT, quality alone does not open the door — you need a track record, so acquisition was the way to buy both a business channel and the engineers to fill it.

The reach kept extending around the motor, vertically and horizontally: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries’ machine tools became Nidec Machine Tool in 2021, followed by a stake in OKK; a 2022 battery venture with Norway’s Freyr became Nidec Energy; a 2023 venture with Brazil’s Embraer became Nidec Aerospace. In April 2023 the parent itself was renamed from Nippon Densan to Nidec, its domestic subsidiaries relabelled in step — and even then the offensive did not let up, with a tender-offer takeover of TAKISAWA that November.

The unresolved question was the founder himself. Nagamori had sat at the centre for fifty years, the culture and the decisions inseparable from him, and a succession of hand-picked outside presidents had each left quickly — the market’s single greatest worry. In February 2024 the ex-Sony executive Mitsuya Kishida became president while Nagamori stayed on as Global Group Representative, a collective leadership meant to carry the culture forward. Consolidated sales for the year to March 2024 reached $15.5B (¥2.35tn) — a half-century’s climb from a micro-motor workshop to a comprehensive motor maker binding together automotive, home-appliance, industrial and electronic-optical businesses. Then, in 2025, an accounting fraud surfaced: the “hit-the-number” discipline that had powered the growth had become its seedbed, and Nagamori resigned his representative directorship — the strength of his centripetal pull and the weakness of the company’s governance revealed as two sides of one coin.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1994

Concentrating on HDD spindle motors — and breaking free of the mainstay (1994)

Win the world’s top spot, then build a company that need not lean on it

The heart of this decision was not opening a new market but deliberately thinning, while it was still at its peak, the company’s dependence on the very mainstay it had fought to make number one in the world. HDD spindle motors were the strength that pushed Nidec to the global top, and that position existed precisely because it had concentrated there. From the loss of 1995 Nagamori read that this same strength was at once its greatest weakness; he deliberately lowered the mainstay’s share of sales and chose to widen the product line into automotive and home appliances. A decision to cut back, by one’s own hand, the share of a growing business cannot wait until a crisis has already deepened.

The HDD would in time recede as smartphones and semiconductor storage spread, but by then Nidec’s product mix had already broadened into automotive and home appliances. Taking the world’s top spot on a single leg and then remaking the body so that it need not rely on that leg — this two-stage design was a guard against sinking together with the mainstay’s rise and fall. Yet because most of the new pillars were obtained through acquisition, success or failure hinged on how deftly the company bought and how strongly it integrated. The courage to thin a world-leading mainstay and the capacity to buy up the next one supported one and the same transformation.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1997

Establishing a growth model built on acquisitions (1997)

The strength and the limits of a method that turns waste into resource

The heart of this decision lay not in the selection of which company to buy at what price, but in building a repeatable template for turnaround: take in cheaply a firm that owns something good yet has gone slack and sunk, and, simply by installing discipline, flip it into high profitability. Treating waste not as a defect but as untapped resource, and generating profit through cleaning and a change of mindset rather than by cutting people, was also a way of investing — picking up, at a discount, sound assets worn down by price wars or recession. The willingness to buy a company’s history and credit along with it, in one lot, became the passage over the wall of a Japanese market that prizes a track record.

Yet whether the template kept turning depended heavily on the personal, centripetal force of Nagamori himself, who visited each acquisition every week and moved its shop floor. Mindsets changed through cleaning because the man at the top got covered in oil himself, and there is a limit to pouring that same heat evenly into dozens of companies. The more acquisitions it stacked up, the more organisations there were to digest, and the skill of integration governed the whole. This method of turning waste into resource pushed Nidec up into a comprehensive motor maker, yet because it was inseparably bound to the founder’s own ability, it left open the question of how far it could ever be handed to a successor.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2003

Acquiring and rebuilding Sankyo Seiki (2003)

An acquisition as the receiver of an industry shakeout — its meaning and its weight

The heart of this decision was neither price nor scale but the fact that it took in a sunken rival rather than crushing it. Sankyo Seiki had challenged Nidec on the same ground — the fluid dynamic bearing (FDB) — and stalled under the weight of its own investment. Instead of knocking it down, Nidec revived it through cleaning and by preserving employment, and folded it into its own camp as Nippon Densan Sankyo. Under Nagamori’s reading of an industry that held too many companies and was slow to shake out, Nidec volunteered itself as the receiver for the reorganisation. A trend of large corporations letting go of underperforming subsidiaries was what made the deal possible.

Yet the FDB motor that served as the foothold for the rescue stood on the foundation of the HDD. So long as the hard disk grew as the storage device of PCs and servers it was a strength, but if the recording medium eventually shifted to another technology, the weight of that base would change too. Reviving a rival whole thickened Nidec’s precision-equipment business, but it was also a choice that added one more operation still swayed by the rise and fall of a mainstay product. The rebirth of Sankyo Seiki can be read as a way-station within the larger current of extending the next pillar into automotive and home appliances.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2024

Mitsuya Kishida becomes president, and the shift to collective leadership (2024)

Choosing to hand over by system, not by reproducing the charismatic founder

The heart of this managerial decision was neither a response to financial crisis nor investment in a new business, but the design of succession — how to hand to the next generation a decision-making that had been concentrated, for half a century, in the founder as an individual. After a run of short-lived departures by executives brought in from outside to reproduce his own way of running the company, Shigenobu Nagamori let go of the idea of seeking a single “second Nagamori” and switched to a selection that set five vice-presidents in competition and to a collective leadership built around Mitsuya Kishida. In shifting his footing from reproducing an exceptional individual toward running the company by a system in which several executives support one another, one glimpses a rare posture of self-relativisation for a succession led by a charismatic manager.

Yet the two-headed structure, with a founder who retained representative authority running alongside, carried to the end the question of how much discretion to allow the successor president. That question moved toward resolution in an unforeseen form — the improper accounting that surfaced in 2025 and the subsequent resignation of Shigenobu Nagamori as a representative director — and real managerial power converged on Mitsuya Kishida. That the company had confronted early the task of loosening its dependence on the founder, while the problems rooted in that very corporate culture erupted midway through the handover, shows just how hard the succession of charismatic management is. The verdict on this decision — an attempt to open a concentration in one person into a system — appears to rest on how far the Kishida regime can achieve both the rebuilding of governance and continued growth.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2025

The accounting fraud comes to light — the breakdown of “results-above-all” management (2025)

The growth born of centripetal force, and the hollow at the centre of governance

The heart of this affair lies not in isolated bookkeeping errors but in the fact that the very corporate culture that sustained the company’s growth became the seedbed of the fraud. The discipline that made high targets non-negotiable was the driving force that pushed Nidec up into the world’s top motor maker. But that same discipline, at sites that could not close the gap between target and true capability, spread across many locations the deferral of “negative legacy” and the carrying-forward of losses. When the third-party committee cited excessive performance pressure, the absoluteness of the founder, and the failure of the checks meant to restrain it, it named precisely how the strength of the centripetal force and the weakness of governance were two sides of one coin.

The company had confronted the design of succession early and had been moving toward a collective leadership. Even so, the problems rooted in a results-above-all culture erupted midway through the handover, and moved toward resolution in the form of the resignation of the founder who held representative authority. After the charismatic manager departs, how to keep the discipline of non-negotiable delivery as an engine of growth while building in a brake so that it does not corrode the reliability of the accounts — the success or failure of the rebuild turns on that single point. The restatement of results, the Tokyo Stock Exchange’s review, and the pursuit of management’s responsibility were all still in progress at the time of writing, and the verdict on this affair is left to how far the new regime can accomplish the reconstruction of governance.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— Nidec full history in Japanese →

  1. Nidec Corporation (日本電産 / ニデック) — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports).
  2. Nikkei Business — 日経ビジネス (Nikkei BP): 23 Aug 1982; 28 Mar 1983; 27 Mar 1989; 17 Nov 1997; 18 Aug 2003.
  3. Nikkei Sangyo Shimbun — 日経産業新聞 (Nikkei Inc.): 22 May 1989; 7 Jun 1999; 12 Apr 2000; 16 May 2000; 8 Jun 2000; 28 Apr 2016.
  4. The Nikkei — 日本経済新聞, 21 Oct 2006 (Nagamori foresees automotive becoming the largest core business).
  5. Weekly Toyo Keizai — 週刊東洋経済 (Toyo Keizai), 29 Oct 2005.
  6. Securities Analysts Journal — 証券アナリストジャーナル, Dec 1988.
  7. Tokai Research & Consulting — 東海総研マネジメント, Feb 1994.
  8. Market survey on small hard disks — 小型ハードディスクに関する市場調査, 1990 (Nagamori’s pledge to preserve employment in the antitrust review).
  9. 1995 New Year National Managers’ Seminar — 1995新春全国経営者セミナー (Nagamori: “if a rival takes a month, we take fifteen days”).

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →