Rakuten Group

Building a three-domain ecosystem: the Tabi-no-Mado and DLJ acquisitions (2003)

Key decision·2003· Rakuten Group — the full company history →

A design that earns from “lending the place” and finance

The heart of this decision was that, to break its dependence on the mall alone, Rakuten bundled several businesses together through acquisitions in which it did not involve itself deeply in operations. Travel, securities and cards carry neither logistics nor inventory; Rakuten held the traffic and the membership base and earned on fees and transaction volume. Within the same online retailing, and in contrast to an Amazon that poured vast sums into logistics and attacked through direct sales, Rakuten chose to earn by lending the place and through finance. The “no-touch model,” as Chairman and President Mikitani called it, was a choice to widen the range of its businesses all at once without bearing inventory risk.

And yet the design of taking finance in-house brought a weight of its own. Securities, and later banking, pushed up both assets and liabilities together, and consolidated total assets swelled from $2.8B (¥308bn) for the year ended December 2004 to $15.0B (¥1.66tn) a year later. Compounded by impairments on overseas businesses, the year ended December 2008 brought a net loss of $531.3M (¥55bn), the first since the company’s founding. Even so, the 2003–2004 design of binding several businesses under a single ID took hold as a points-based economic zone, and became a pattern Rakuten returned to every time it widened its businesses — into life and casualty insurance later, and on into telecommunications. How to step off the single leg of shopping — this run of acquisitions was the first practice to give that question the answer of an “ecosystem.”

Revenue and net margin, FY1998–FY2008

Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY2003 onwards — after it was taken.

Source: securities reports

Read the full dossier in Japanese →

The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.

Other key decisions at Rakuten Group


Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer

  • This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
  • Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
  • Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
  • Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
  • Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.

Data API

Rakuten Group’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET. Full specification →

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/4755/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/4755/history.json History overview
GET /api/4755/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/4755/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/4755/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/4755/executives.json Executives
GET /api/4755/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/4755/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/4755/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/4755/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/4755/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/4755/workforce.json Workforce