Rakuten Group

Company history

Founded
1997
Head office
Tokyo, Japan
Listed
2004 · TSE 4755
Founder
Hiroshi Mikitani
Revenue · FYE Mar 2025
$16.7B (¥2.5tn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2025
-$1.2B (-¥178bn)
Rakuten Group: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1997The merchant-first virtual mall

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports & corporate yearbooks
FY2001 · consolidated
Revenue$55M
Net income
Net margin
FY2004 · consolidated
Revenue$421M
Net income
Net margin
  1. 1997Hiroshi Mikitani opens Rakuten Ichiba with 13 shops
  2. 2000OTC listing; acquires the portal Infoseek
  3. 2002Fee model shifts to usage-based charging
  4. 2003Buys into travel and securities — three pillars
  5. 2004Lists on the JASDAQ exchange

In February 1997 Hiroshi Mikitani, a former banker at the Industrial Bank of Japan, set up a company called M.D.M. in Minato, Tokyo, and that May opened Rakuten Ichiba with just thirteen shops. Where the department-store-backed virtual malls of the day charged rents on the order of $8,263 (¥1m) a month, Rakuten asked a flat $413 (¥50,000) — and paired it with RMS, an editing tool simple enough that a shopkeeper with no feel for the internet could open a store. Its target customers were not big retailers but the owners of small neighbourhood shops, and the first year’s stores were won by salespeople walking from merchant to merchant, one door at a time.

That pricing pulled shops in fast — from 320 at the end of 1998 to some 6,150 by early 2003 — and in 2000 Rakuten listed over-the-counter, raising about $459.4M (¥50bn). When Yahoo! Shopping overtook it in a 2000 traffic survey, Mikitani spent the IPO cash to buy the portal Infoseek for $83.5M (¥9bn), chasing the traffic gap with the aim, in his words, of “a comprehensive media company built around shopping.” Even through the consumer slump of 2001–2002, when Japan’s retail sales fell year on year every month, Rakuten’s gross merchandise sales grew by roughly 40 percent — a store-less mall rising while department stores and general merchandisers shrank.

The founding fee, though, had a ceiling: revenue could grow only with the number of shops. In 2002 Rakuten scrapped the flat fee for merchants clearing $7,982 (¥1m) a month, moving from a “landlord” to a franchise model in which its own revenue rose with its merchants’ sales — a change Mikitani was prepared to push through “even if the number of merchants halved.” The cash it threw off funded a rapid diversification: the travel site Tabi-no-Mado in 2003 and the securities firm that became Rakuten Securities that November, so that within a short span, and for a little over $517.6M (¥60bn), shopping, travel and finance stood as three pillars.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2005Building the ecosystem

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports & corporate yearbooks
FY2005 · consolidated
Revenue$1.2B
Net income$176M
Net margin15%
FY2018 · consolidated
Revenue$10.0B
Net income$1.3B
Net margin12.9%
  1. 2008First net loss in the company’s history
  2. 2009Acquires the bank that becomes Rakuten Bank
  3. 2010“Englishnization” — English made the official language
  4. 2014Buys Viber and Ebates; starts Rakuten Mobile (MVNO)
  5. 2017Record results; declares entry as the fourth carrier
  6. 2018Adds casualty insurance, completing the financial suite

Absorbing finance transformed Rakuten’s balance sheet. Taking credit, payments, securities and banking in-house, consolidated total assets leapt from $2.8B (¥308bn) at the end of 2004 to $15.0B (¥1.66tn) a year later, as financial assets and liabilities piled up on both sides, and revenue climbed sixfold across the decade. But the model of gathering customers through goods and monetizing them through finance had a cost: impairments on acquired businesses such as Lycos Japan drove a net loss of $531.3M (¥55bn) in the year ended December 2008 — the first in Rakuten’s history — which only pushed it deeper into finance, adding the bank that became Rakuten Bank in 2009 and the Edy e-money business in 2010.

Early in the 2010s Rakuten pushed hard overseas, buying France’s PriceMinister, the e-book firm Kobo, the messaging app Viber for roughly $850.3M (¥90bn) and the North American cash-back service Ebates for about $944.8M (¥100bn). In 2010 Mikitani declared English the company’s official in-house language — “Englishnization” — and set out to become a global company. The overseas returns were tested at once: impairments on foreign e-commerce produced another net loss in 2011, and much of what was bought disappointed — PriceMinister’s brand was retired by 2021, Viber’s hoped-for platform synergy stayed thin — leaving behind goodwill that would hang over the balance sheet as impairment risk. Ebates, rebranded Rakuten Rewards, was the exception that carried the points economy abroad.

Running through it all was Mikitani’s preference for a “no-touch model” — travel and securities without logistics, a mall without inventory, book stock left to a distributor — a way to grow while diversifying risk without swelling the balance sheet, the mirror image of an Amazon that competed through warehouses and direct sales. From the Super Points launched in 2002, that instinct crystallized into the phrase “Rakuten Ecosystem”: points earned in the mall could be spent across travel, securities, cards and banking, binding members to a single ID. Record results followed — revenue of $8.4B (¥944bn) in 2017 — and with the 2018 addition of the business that became Rakuten Insurance, the group held a full financial suite. Interest-bearing debt had meanwhile tripled to $11.2B (¥1.23tn); that heavy balance sheet was the ground on which Mikitani would next fight in telecommunications.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2019Betting the balance sheet on mobile

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports & corporate yearbooks
FY2019 · consolidated
Revenue$11.6B
Net income-$292M
Net margin-2.5%
FY2025 · consolidated
Revenue$16.7B
Net income-$1.2B
Net margin-7.1%
  1. 2019Rakuten Mobile launches as an MNO
  2. 2021Renamed Rakuten Group, Inc.; Rakuten Symphony launches
  3. 2022Record net loss of $2.8B (¥373bn)
  4. 2023“Rakuten Saikyo Plan”; wins the 700 MHz platinum band
  5. 2025Mobile turns EBITDA-positive; passes 10 million lines

In December 2017 Rakuten applied to become Japan’s fourth mobile carrier, breaking into a market held by NTT Docomo, KDDI and SoftBank. Renting other carriers’ lines as an MVNO had left its monthly point of contact with customers in another company’s grip; building its own base stations would, in time, let it control the cost of connectivity and pull the telecom contract into the ecosystem’s ID. Mikitani cast cheap mobile fees as a cause and the smartphone as “a social human right.” The second bet was a fully virtualized Open RAN, running network software on general-purpose servers to compress capital spending — and, if the technology could be sold on, to grow into the global vendor business of Rakuten Symphony. But building an unprecedented network alone, and launching without the 700 MHz “platinum band,” left it weak indoors and underground against the incumbents.

From the October 2019 launch the losses mounted — net losses every year, deepening to a record $2.8B (¥373bn) in 2022 as the mobile segment alone lost $3.6B (¥479bn) at the operating line. Cumulative net losses from 2019 through 2023 exceeded $6.4B (¥840bn), interest-bearing debt swelled from $11.2B (¥1.23tn) to $31.0B (¥3.4tn) by 2021, and total assets ballooned from $66.5B (¥7.34tn) to $155.3B (¥20.4tn) as fintech deposits and telecom investment expanded together. Bond-refinancing risk drew the ratings agencies’ concern, and Rakuten carved off assets to raise cash — renaming itself Rakuten Group in 2021, listing Rakuten Bank on its own in 2023 — a tightrope walk of funding the network while selling pieces of the group.

The turn came when Rakuten loosened its insistence on going it alone. The “Rakuten Saikyo Plan” of June 2023 used interconnection with KDDI’s lines to patch the indoor and underground gaps, and that October it won the platinum 700 MHz band. It swung from an independent course to alliance — Rakuten Securities and Rakuten Card each tied up with the Mizuho group for a steadier funding base. Fintech’s steady profit, an operating profit of $1.0B (¥153bn) in 2024, absorbed the mobile losses, which narrowed as subscribers grew. In 2025 the mobile business reached EBITDA profitability, crossed 10 million lines, and the group posted a second straight year of operating profit — the first evidence that an inventory-shy net company might, after all, carry the heaviest of businesses to the point of return.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1997

Founding Rakuten Ichiba, the merchant-first mall (1997)

The market that a breakthrough price opened

The heart of this founding decision was a bet placed, before any question of technology or selection, on how far Rakuten could widen the base of sellers. Online retailing at the time was something well-capitalized firms took on at high cost. President Mikitani did the opposite: with a flat fee of $413 (¥50,000) a month and tools that required no specialist knowledge, he turned even small shopkeepers and farmers who had never touched a computer into sellers. The more sellers there were, the deeper the selection and the traffic grew, and that in turn drew still more shops. The breakthrough price was not mere discounting but the design of an entrance built to keep that cycle turning.

Yet the flat fee, as the company grew, also turned into a wall. As users multiplied and the load and cost on the system swelled, a fixed fee let revenue rise only with the number of shops. In 2002 Rakuten introduced usage-based charging tied to monthly sales, stepping into the revision of its fee structure that it would call its “second founding.” Even so, the 1997 choice to open a storefront to individual shopkeepers for $413 (¥50,000) a month remade Japanese online retailing from the preserve of a few large players into a market with a broad base. What sets this founding decision apart is that it reshaped the market itself not through scale or capital, but through the question of whom it opened a storefront to.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2002

From “landlord” to “franchise”: reworking the fee model (2002)

The shift that laid the ecosystem’s revenue base

The heart of this decision was that Rakuten put its hand to the very fee model behind its success while business was at its peak. A flat fee, whose revenue accumulated in proportion to the number of shops, had lowered the barrier to opening a store and pushed Rakuten to an early lead — but it was a structure in which growth would stop once shop numbers plateaued. By switching to usage-based charging linked to sales, Rakuten rebuilt the relationship so that its own revenue rose as its merchants’ sales rose, redirected its sales force from signing new shops toward consulting, and put in place a mechanism for growing together with its merchants.

The change carried risk. For high-selling merchants it was in effect a price increase, and if it drove them away it could halt the growth Rakuten had enjoyed since its founding. When Chairman and President Mikitani said he “was prepared to see it through even if the number of merchants halved,” it was a judgment made with that cost in full view. In the event, no exodus came: gross merchandise sales rose from $430.4M (¥52bn) in 2001 to $598.7M (¥75bn) in 2002, and the cash thickened by the fee revision became the seed capital for Rakuten Super Points, launched that November, and for the 2003 move into travel and securities.

The more successful a mechanism, the more a decision to remake it tends to be put off. Rakuten’s transformation of its fee structure — which it called its “second founding” — is instructive precisely because, by reconnecting its relationship with merchants through a link to their sales, it prepared the revenue base of the later Rakuten Ecosystem at an early stage.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2003

Building a three-domain ecosystem: the Tabi-no-Mado and DLJ acquisitions (2003)

A design that earns from “lending the place” and finance

The heart of this decision was that, to break its dependence on the mall alone, Rakuten bundled several businesses together through acquisitions in which it did not involve itself deeply in operations. Travel, securities and cards carry neither logistics nor inventory; Rakuten held the traffic and the membership base and earned on fees and transaction volume. Within the same online retailing, and in contrast to an Amazon that poured vast sums into logistics and attacked through direct sales, Rakuten chose to earn by lending the place and through finance. The “no-touch model,” as Chairman and President Mikitani called it, was a choice to widen the range of its businesses all at once without bearing inventory risk.

And yet the design of taking finance in-house brought a weight of its own. Securities, and later banking, pushed up both assets and liabilities together, and consolidated total assets swelled from $2.8B (¥308bn) for the year ended December 2004 to $15.0B (¥1.66tn) a year later. Compounded by impairments on overseas businesses, the year ended December 2008 brought a net loss of $531.3M (¥55bn), the first since the company’s founding. Even so, the 2003–2004 design of binding several businesses under a single ID took hold as a points-based economic zone, and became a pattern Rakuten returned to every time it widened its businesses — into life and casualty insurance later, and on into telecommunications. How to step off the single leg of shopping — this run of acquisitions was the first practice to give that question the answer of an “ecosystem.”

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2017

Becoming the fourth carrier: the bet on a fully virtualized network (2017)

The reckoning of a bet that joined the ecosystem to telecom

The heart of this decision was a contrarian one: that a net company earning from e-commerce and finance would take on, for itself, the most capital-hungry infrastructure of all — telecommunications. To remain an MVNO renting lines was to leave its monthly point of contact with customers forever in the grip of another company’s network; to sever that dependence, Rakuten chose the heavy fixed asset of its own base stations. Chairman and President Mikitani’s reading that a fully virtualized network could cut costs by 70 to 80 percent was the premise on which the venture’s economics rested, hinging on that single point of compressed capital spending — but the cost of building an unprecedented network and covering the whole country exceeded the initial estimates, and rebounded as more than $6.1B (¥800bn) in cumulative net losses and the burden of bond redemptions.

That the bet did not end in a swing and a miss was because, somewhere along the way, Rakuten loosened its insistence on an all-own network. Filling the indoor and underground weak spots with KDDI roaming, securing a platinum band, and thickening the financial backing through the tie-up with Mizuho — laying realistic corrections over an aggressive plan, it reached 10 million subscriber lines and EBITDA profitability in 2025. The vision of extending the ecosystem from goods to finance and on to telecommunications came at a cost that once shook the finances of the entire company, but it has, for now, made real its original aim of placing the monthly telecom contract at the centre of the ecosystem. Whether the 10 million lines that Chairman and President Mikitani called “a waypoint” will bear fruit worthy of the capital sunk into them will be answered by the ARPU and churn rate still to come.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— Rakuten Group full history in Japanese →

  1. Rakuten Group, Inc. — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports).
  2. Nikkei Business — 日経ビジネス (Nikkei BP): 23 Oct 2000; 11 Dec 2000; 10 Feb 2003; 22 Mar 2004.
  3. Rakuten Group, Inc. — earnings briefings (決算説明会).

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →