Merger talks with Western Digital — and their collapse (2021)
A coalition of capital that blocked a union of the inventors
At the centre of this collapse is a paradox: the two parties that had shared the ground where flash memory was actually made — Kioxia, heir to the Toshiba line that gave the technology to the world, and Western Digital, its partner in joint production — could not be joined, defeated by a complicated coalition of capital. In the fabs the two could split output and investment down the middle; the roster of shareholders and their interests could not be halved the same way. The ownership structure itself, with a competitor, SK Hynix, sitting on the share register, is what blocked a merger that looked entirely natural in business terms.
That said, the merger falling through also meant that Kioxia chose to stand on its own. The year after the collapse it endured the trough of the memory cycle, listed on the TSE Prime Market in December 2024, and headed for record profits as demand recovered. Had the merger gone through, those fruits would have been shared between the new company and the former shareholders. In choosing to face the swings of the market with its own capital and its own technology rather than by fusing with a partner, the collapse became the point at which Kioxia settled its footing as a company standing alone.
Revenue and net margin, FY2016–FY2026
Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY2021 onwards — after it was taken.
Source: securities reports
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at Kioxia Holdings
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
Kioxia Holdings’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/285A/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/285A/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/285A/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/285A/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/285A/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/285A/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/285A/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/285A/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/285A/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/285A/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/285A/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/285A/workforce.json | Workforce |