Tokyo Century

Company history

Financial history 2006–2026 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
1969
Head office
Tokyo, Japan
Listed
2003
Formed by
Itochu, Dai-Ichi Bank, Nippon Life, Asahi Life
Revenue · FYE Mar 2026
$9.2B (¥1.46tn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2026
$703.7M (¥111bn)
Tokyo Century: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1969A company agreed on by four shareholders

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2006 · unconsolidated
Revenue$2.6B
Net income$62M
Net margin2.3%
FY2008 · unconsolidated
Revenue$3.0B
Net income$63M
Net margin2.1%
  1. 1969Century Leasing System founded by four shareholders
  2. 1985Auto leasing hived off as Century Auto Lease
  3. 2003Lists on the Tokyo Stock Exchange (second section)
  4. 2004Moves to the first section
  5. 2005Auto arm merges with NTT Auto Leasing as Nippon Car Solutions
  6. 2008Agrees to merge with Tokyo Leasing, two weeks after Lehman

Leasing needs two capabilities that rarely sit in one house: the ability to source the equipment, and the ability to judge whether the borrower will pay. A trading company has the goods and the sales channels; a bank has the credit judgement and the funding. In July 1969, with capital spending surging through Japan’s high-growth years, Itochu, Dai-Ichi Bank, Nippon Life and Asahi Mutual Life put up $1.4M (¥500m) between them and incorporated Century Leasing System in Tokyo, expressly to wire the two halves together inside a single company and write business no single parent could write alone. The industry was still forming — Orient Leasing, today’s Orix, dated only from 1963 — and the founding prospectus spoke of contributing to the rationalisation and modernisation of industry. The design also fixed something more lasting: a company whose management framework was agreed jointly by a trading house, a bank and two insurers.

Through the 1980s the model worked as intended, growing lease receivables on Itochu’s equipment flow and Dai-Ichi Kangyo Bank’s credit lines. In April 1985 the auto-leasing arm was hived off into Century Auto Lease, again with partners; twenty years later, in October 2005, it merged as an equal with NTT Auto Leasing to become Nippon Car Solutions — a company the group now owned half of rather than all of, with roughly 150,000 vehicles instead of a fleet it could never have reached alone. The tie to NTT began there, and would take fifteen more years to reach its conclusion.

In September 2003 the company listed on the second section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange, moving up to the first section a year later. For thirty-four years its credit had been made of its shareholders’ names — it could run ¥800bn of assets on ¥18.6bn of equity because lenders looked past it to the four; what listing bought was not only the ¥7.52bn raised but a price and a rating of its own, marked daily. Yet the industry was consolidating around the megabanks: Sumitomo Mitsui Finance and Leasing was formed in 2007, Mitsubishi UFJ Lease merged with Diamond Lease the same year, and only the Mizuho camp still kept two separate firms — the old Bank of Tokyo’s Tokyo Leasing and the old Dai-Ichi Kangyo’s Century Leasing System. Growing alone was running out of road.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2009The merger, and the reinvention it paid for

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2009 · unconsolidated
Revenue$2.9B
Net income$64M
Net margin2.2%
FY2018 · consolidated
Revenue$9.2B
Net income$465M
Net margin5.1%
  1. 2009Merger completed; Tokyo Century Leasing formed
  2. 2011Core systems integrated — the industry’s fastest
  3. 2012Solar joint venture with Kyocera
  4. 2016CSI Leasing wholly acquired; renamed Tokyo Century
  5. 201720% of Aviation Capital Group for about $445.8M (¥50bn)
  6. 2018Reorganised into four business fields

The basic agreement to merge with Tokyo Leasing was announced on 29 September 2008 — a fortnight after Lehman Brothers failed. What the two sides settled was deliberately narrow: that they would combine, which entity would survive, and what the company would be called. The share exchange ratio was left open, and with the stock trading down to ¥480 that October, fixing it first would almost certainly have wrecked the talks. The merger took effect in April 2009 as Tokyo Century Leasing. The surviving entity held only 49.0% of the votes and took in ¥1,158bn of assets against its own ¥845.9bn; the presidency went to Tokyo Leasing’s Asada Shunichi, the chairmanship to Century’s own president.

Asada made systems the test of whether the merger was real, calling IT a lifeline of management on a par with finance and running the integration himself; the two core systems were folded into one by March 2011, two and a half years after the announcement and the fastest such integration in the industry. The financials followed: recurring profit rose from ¥33.4bn in FY2009 to ¥46.2bn in FY2011 and ¥55.1bn in FY2013, on consolidated assets of ¥2,260bn that put the group around fourth in the industry. New ground came quickly too — a controlling stake in IHI Finance Support in 2010, a subsidiary in Indonesia in 2011, and in September 2012 a solar joint venture with Kyocera, set up weeks after Japan’s feed-in tariff began and the first of what would later be disclosed as the environmental infrastructure business.

Then came the two acquisitions that changed what the company was. It bought 35% of the American IT-equipment lessor CSI Leasing in 2015 and the rest in 2016; in December 2017 it paid about $445.8M (¥50bn) for 20% of Aviation Capital Group, a large US aircraft lessor — a field where individual assets run from tens of millions to $100m apiece and where few Japanese bank- or trading-house-affiliated lessors had ventured. In October 2016 it dropped “Leasing” from its name to become Tokyo Century, and from April 2018 it reported in four fields — domestic leasing, domestic auto, specialty and international. The new disclosure made the transformation legible: in FY2018 specialty, led by aircraft, earned ¥38.9bn, more than domestic leasing’s ¥27.7bn and the largest segment profit in the group.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2019Aircraft: the ¥321bn bet, and the shocks that followed

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2019 · consolidated
Revenue$9.8B
Net income$480M
Net margin4.9%
FY2022 · consolidated
Revenue$9.7B
Net income$383M
Net margin3.9%
  1. 2019Aviation Capital Group wholly acquired for about $2.9B (¥321bn)
  2. 2020NTT alliance; about $878.4M (¥94bn) raised in a share allotment
  3. 2020Covid-19 hits aircraft and rental cars together
  4. 2022Eight aircraft stranded in Russia; heavy impairments

On 6 December 2019 Tokyo Century bought the remaining 24.5% of Aviation Capital Group for about $2.9B (¥321bn) ($2.983bn), taking full ownership of a lessor with 316 aircraft owned or managed. Consolidated assets jumped from ¥4,086.5bn to ¥5,608.6bn in a single year — ¥1,522.1bn, a 37% rise and the largest in the company’s history — with interest-bearing debt up ¥488.7bn. A cross-border acquisition of that size was without precedent in Japanese leasing, and it made the group the domestic front-runner in aircraft finance.

The price was balance-sheet thinness: the equity ratio slipped from 10.5% to 9.9%. Two months later, in February 2020, the company announced a capital and business alliance with NTT and raised about $878.4M (¥94bn) in a third-party allotment — NTT taking roughly $655.6M (¥70bn) for about 10% and third place on the register, with the balance to Itochu, its largest holder. NTT·TC Lease followed in July 2020 as a 50/50 venture. The auto-leasing arm spun out in 1985 had, by way of a merger of equals, walked its partner all the way onto the parent’s own shareholder list.

The timing could hardly have been worse. Covid-19 hit both new pillars at once: airlines demanded rent relief and aircraft became hard to repossess, while rental-car bookings at Nippon Rent-A-Car fell to about half of the prior year — worse, Asada told the FY2019 briefing, than anything he had seen, including the 2011 earthquake. Then Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 stranded eight ACG aircraft on lease to Russian carriers, with a book value near $380m: about ¥46bn of impairment in FY2021 and ¥75.9bn of extraordinary losses in FY2022 as the whole Russian exposure was written down. Net profit fell 94% to ¥4.8bn, the lowest since the renaming. That the group stayed in the black at all was the four-field structure working — domestic leasing at ¥22.9bn and auto at ¥12.1bn covering specialty’s ¥19.1bn loss — and it was in that year that environmental infrastructure was split out as a fifth reporting field.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2023Recovery, and a plan to 2027

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2023 · consolidated
Revenue$9.4B
Net income$34M
Net margin0.4%
FY2026 · consolidated
Revenue$9.2B
Net income$704M
Net margin7.6%
  1. 2023Medium-Term Management Plan 2027 announced
  2. 2024Net profit recovers to ¥72.1bn
  3. 2025Record ¥85.2bn net profit; Fujiwara Koji becomes president

With the extraordinary losses behind it and restructuring taking hold, the recovery was abrupt: net profit went from ¥4.8bn in FY2022 to ¥72.1bn in FY2023 and a record ¥85.2bn in FY2024, with recurring profit rising to ¥117.3bn and then ¥132.2bn. The engine was the normalisation of ACG’s aircraft business — lease income and gains on aircraft sales recovering together — while the international field led by CSI Leasing kept growing at double digits, so that two American subsidiaries now anchored the group’s earnings.

In May 2023 president Baba Koichi set out a five-year plan to fiscal 2027 under the banner of TC Transformation: four workstreams in portfolio, people, digital and green, targeting ¥100bn of net profit and an ROE above 9%. Stretching the plan from the customary three years to five was itself a judgement — long enough to bridge the recovery curve in aircraft and the completion of property redevelopment projects around 2028. In April 2025 Baba was succeeded by Fujiwara Koji, until recently president of Mizuho Bank, as the eleventh president: a fourth consecutive chief executive from the Mizuho side, and a reminder that a company assembled in 1969 out of four shareholders’ agreement is still, fifty-six years on, shaped by who sits on its register.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2003

Listing on the Tokyo Stock Exchange in its 34th year (2003)

From borrowing on four names to borrowing on its own

For the thirty-four years from 1969 to 2003, this company’s credit was made out of the names of its four shareholders: Itochu’s deals and the Dai-Ichi Bank group’s credit lines, the money of Nippon Life and Asahi Mutual Life. That it could turn ¥800bn of assets on ¥18.6bn of its own equity was for no other reason than that lenders saw those four standing behind it. What the listing gave the company was not merely the ¥7.52bn of cash raised in the offering. It was a credit of its own, marked every day by a share price and a rating.

The listing did not, however, move the cast of shareholders. As late as March 2006, Itochu still held 20.13%, and the top ten holders 59.23%. The presidents who followed continued to come from Nippon Life, the Mizuho side and Itochu, and the pattern by which the shareholder structure decides the management structure remained. What changed was how the money was raised, not what the company was made of. Three years after listing, in March 2006, the company took a fresh rating and issued its first ¥10bn of unsecured straight bonds in its own name.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2005

Recasting the auto-leasing subsidiary as a 50/50 venture with NTT (2005)

Halve the stake, add a partner

The 2005 decision was neither a sale of a business nor a purchase of one. It converted a wholly owned company with ¥28.3bn of sales into a company with some ¥66bn of sales of which it owned only half. Consolidated sales fell by ¥26.7bn and headcount by 196. On the numbers it looks like a contraction, but the fleet under management came to about 150,000 vehicles, putting the company in a top group it could not have reached alone. Asked to choose between the size of its stake and the size of the business, this company chose the business.

That the partner it chose was NTT told later. Two companies alike in resting on captive group demand placed their respective parents side by side as equal investors. The arrangement lasted eight years, until Tokyo Century Leasing took 59.5% in 2013, and over that time dealings between the two groups accumulated well beyond vehicles. Fifteen years after the merger, in 2020, NTT paid some ¥70bn to become the third-largest shareholder of Tokyo Century itself. The auto-leasing company carved out with Itochu and others in 1985 has, by changing partners, worked its way round to the shareholder register of its own parent.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2008

The merger with Tokyo Leasing, agreed two weeks after Lehman (2008)

A handshake with the ratio left blank

What catches the eye in this merger is the sequence. Lehman Brothers failed on 15 September 2008; the basic agreement was announced on 29 September. The share exchange ratio was left undecided, and what the parties agreed was only the fact of combining, which company would survive, and the new name. Had the ratio been fixed first, negotiations would almost certainly have snarled once the shares were sold down to a low of ¥480 in October. Narrowing what had to be decided and pushing what could not be decided to a later date left, in the middle of a crisis, at least the framework standing.

The other point is that the surviving company held only 49.0% of the voting rights. The ¥1,158bn of assets it took over were larger than its own ¥845.9bn, so in scale it was the side being swallowed. Even so, it took the seat of surviving entity in law, and the second half of the new name. The presidency went to the other side’s Asada Shunichi, while its own president moved up to chairman. Thirteen years after the merger, chairman Asada wrote that the desk clock handed to every employee in the spring of 2009 still sat on the desk in his office.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— Tokyo Century full history in Japanese →

  1. Tokyo Century Corporation — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports).
  2. Tokyo Century Corporation — earnings briefing (決算説明会), FY2019.
  3. Tokyo Century Corporation — 中期経営計画2027 (Medium-Term Management Plan 2027), May 2023.
  4. Interview with president Asada Shunichi on IT and the post-merger systems integration — via CiNii Research.
  5. ZAITEN — on the 2025 appointment of Fujiwara Koji and Mizuho’s influence over the presidency.

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer


Data API

Tokyo Century’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/8439/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/8439/history.json History overview
GET /api/8439/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/8439/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/8439/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/8439/executives.json Executives
GET /api/8439/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/8439/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/8439/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/8439/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/8439/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/8439/workforce.json Workforce