Mizuho Leasing

Company history

Financial history 2006–2026 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
1969
Head office
Tokyo, Japan
Listed
2004
Origin
16 companies led by the Industrial Bank of Japan
Revenue · FYE Mar 2026
$5.8B (¥922bn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2026
$301M (¥48bn)
Mizuho Leasing: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1969A company owned by sixteen

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1969Pacific Lease founded by 16 companies with ¥500 million of capital
  2. 1972Construction-machinery and ship leasing begins
  3. 1981Renamed IBJ Leasing
  4. 1982Leveraged aircraft leasing (1985: Japan’s first rolling-stock lease)
  5. 1987First overseas subsidiary, in the United Kingdom

In December 1969 the Industrial Bank of Japan gathered fifteen other companies — industrial firms and life insurers representing a cross-section of Japanese business — and together they put up ¥500 million to found Pacific Lease in Tokyo. The leasing industry association had been formed with eight members only five months earlier, and Orient Lease (now Orix), founded in 1964, was still doing the work of introducing the country to the product. IBJ could have entered alone. It chose not to, and the reason was the customer list: the breadth of the shareholder register is the breadth of the deal flow, and sixteen sets of corporate relationships gave the new company a customer base that no single bank could match.

Construction-machinery and ship leasing began in 1972; in November 1981 the name changed to IBJ Leasing, trading the generic “Pacific” for the bank that had convened it and making the customer base explicit. Leveraged aircraft leasing followed in 1982 and Japan’s first rolling-stock lease in 1985. Corporate demand for the tax and off-balance-sheet effects of leasing produced double-digit growth through the decade, and IBJ Leasing rode its parent bank’s large-corporate network.

What it did not do mattered as much. Japan Lease, the equivalent company in the Long-Term Credit Bank orbit, drifted from leasing into acting as its bank’s finance arm, and in 1998 filed for reorganisation with ¥2.3 trillion of liabilities. IBJ Leasing kept its resources in leasing and instalment sales. The two companies came out of the same industry structure and ended in opposite places.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1990Following customers abroad, consolidating at home

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1992Stake acquired in a Thai leasing company
  2. 1998Japan Lease collapses with ¥2.3 trillion of liabilities
  3. 1999Nissan Lease acquired
  4. 2002Auto-leasing subsidiaries merged into one

The Plaza Accord had pushed Japanese manufacturers into local production across Asia, and their overseas subsidiaries needed the same equipment and vehicles leased that the parents leased at home. IBJ Leasing followed them — a UK company in 1987, a stake in a Thai lessor in 1992, an investment in a Philippine finance company in 1998 — but always in step with IBJ’s own overseas arms or with a local financial institution as partner. It did not attempt to build a network of its own from nothing, a pattern it would repeat in every subsequent expansion.

At home the growth was by subsidiary rather than by division. Real-estate and rental companies were set up in 1993 and 1996; in auto leasing, an in-house company in 1998, the purchase of Nissan Lease in 1999 and of Saison Auto Lease Systems in 2000, and in 2002 a merger that folded the former into the latter and put the group’s vehicle business in one place. None of this was diversification in any strategic sense — it was the same concentric circle of leasing, instalment sales and auto leasing, arranged as separate legal entities.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2004Listing, and the last years of IBJ Leasing

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2006 · unconsolidated
Revenue$2.7B
Net income$69M
Net margin2.5%
FY2018 · consolidated
Revenue$3.6B
Net income$123M
Net margin3.4%
  1. 2004Listed on the TSE second section (first section, 2005)
  2. 2012Takes over Toshiba Finance’s corporate finance business
  3. 2016Enters aircraft operating leasing with Aircastle
  4. 2018Revenue ¥384.9 billion; finance becomes the second profit engine

IBJ Leasing listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange’s second section in October 2004 and moved to the first section in September 2005 — thirty-five years after founding, and late by the standards of its industry, where Orix had listed in 1970. Staying private that long was itself a description of the business: it had lived inside the IBJ relationship network and had not needed a public market. Listing was followed by a decade of tidying up, with group companies merged or acquired almost every year.

The expansions that mattered came from other people’s businesses. A Shanghai company opened in 2008 and an Indonesian auto-finance joint venture in 2010. In February 2012 the company took over Toshiba Finance’s corporate financial services arm with a 90% stake — Toshiba was selling non-core assets under the weight of its Westinghouse goodwill, and IBJ Leasing acquired both a business and the leasing demand of the Toshiba group with it. Then in 2016 it entered aircraft operating leasing, a business where a single asset costs ¥5–10 billion and the lessor carries both residual-value risk on the airframe and credit risk on the airline. Rather than build a lessor, it formed joint ventures in Bermuda and the United States with the listed US operator Aircastle.

By FY2018 the company was no longer really a lessor. Revenue reached ¥384.9 billion with recurring profit of ¥24.2 billion, and of that profit ¥9.5 billion came from the finance segment — investment, lending and asset management — against ¥18.0 billion from leasing and instalment sales. Hiromoto Motoyama, appointed president in 2016 from Mizuho Securities, had argued that a company confined to plain finance leases could never escape competition from banks and rival lessors. The shareholder register, meanwhile, still looked like 1969: Dai-ichi Life on top with 6.87%, Mizuho Bank at 3.81%, and the founding industrial companies and insurers around them. A company carrying one bank’s name in its own had reached the limit of what that structure could supply.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2019Two parents, and the platform company

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2019 · consolidated
Revenue$3.5B
Net income$152M
Net margin4.3%
FY2026 · consolidated
Revenue$5.8B
Net income$301M
Net margin5.2%
  1. 2019Mizuho takes 22.2%; renamed Mizuho Leasing
  2. 2020Acquires 25% of Aircastle with Marubeni
  3. 2021Aircastle goodwill of ¥10.7 billion written off in full
  4. 2024Marubeni takes 20.0%, becoming the second-largest shareholder
  5. 2025Record revenue ¥695.4 billion; net income ¥42.0 billion

In February 2019 Mizuho Bank signed a capital and business alliance, taking shares from Dai-ichi Life and others; by March the Mizuho group held 22.2% and the company had become an equity-method affiliate, with Mizuho Bank at 23.03% displacing Dai-ichi Life as largest shareholder. On 1 October 2019 the name changed again, to Mizuho Leasing. What was handed over was a fifth of the equity and a name used for fifty years; what was received was access to Mizuho’s corporate customer base and the right to originate deals with it. FY2019 revenue reached ¥539.2 billion and net income ¥17.5 billion, both above anything achieved as IBJ Leasing.

The other alliance moved faster. In November 2019 Marubeni and Mizuho Leasing agreed to buy Aircastle outright; the deal closed in March 2020 with Mizuho Leasing paying about $629.3M (¥67bn) for 25% of the votes — roughly half of Marubeni’s contribution, leaving the trading house with three-quarters directly and indirectly. Purchases followed in quick succession: a US refrigerated-trailer lessor and a Vietnamese leasing company in 2020, Mizuho Capital and a stake in Nippon Steel Kowa Real Estate in 2021. Then the aircraft market failed twice over. The FY2021 accounts wrote off the entire ¥10.7 billion of Aircastle goodwill; FY2022 carried ¥16.1 billion of one-off items including unrecoverable losses on aircraft leased into Russia. Shusaku Tsuhara, president from 2020, tightened risk management over investees but did not change direction — and by FY2023, with no further Aircastle write-downs, net income reached a record ¥28.4 billion.

On 14 May 2024 Marubeni took 20.0% through a third-party allotment, becoming the second-largest shareholder behind Mizuho’s 23.09% and making Mizuho Leasing its equity-method affiliate too. In five years the company had acquired two parents, neither of which controls it — the only arrangement under which it can draw deals from a bank and a trading house without being absorbed by either. Akira Nakamura, president since 2023, has set a portfolio of core (leasing), growth (real estate, environment and energy, international) and frontier businesses with ¥150 billion of cumulative inorganic investment, and describes the goal as becoming a platform company rather than a lessor. FY2024 revenue was ¥695.4 billion and net income ¥42.0 billion, both records; nineteen Marubeni staff joined; and in April 2025 the stake in Nippon Steel Kowa Real Estate was doubled to 30.14% for ¥50.1 billion. Fifty-six years after sixteen companies each took a slice, the company is still structured as something no one owns outright.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2019

The Mizuho alliance: equity-method affiliation and a new name (2019)

The price of handing over the sign

What IBJ Leasing offered up in this decision was 22.2% of its shares and a corporate name it had used for fifty years. What it received was connection to Mizuho Financial Group’s customer base and the right to originate jointly in growth fields. When a bank-affiliated lessor feels the limit of developing customers on its own, the available roads are two: keep independence and accept being outscaled, or move inside the group and be supplied with deals. IBJ Leasing chose the latter — and even then kept the distance of equity-method rather than subsidiary status. The design of the transaction shows in the order of events: it kept its listing and its managerial autonomy, and handed over the sign first.

Looking at the first year of the alliance, what lifted the figures was not Mizuho but the overseas joint operation with Marubeni. What the bank supplied was joint origination, a thing whose results take time to appear in the accounts. A structure that welcomed both a bank and a trading house as shareholders can be read as aimed at deal flow that depends on neither one alone. The seat that opened in the capital structure in 2019 was not the only one: next to the chair given to Mizuho Bank sits Marubeni, with 20.0%, from 2024.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2019

Taking 25% of Aircastle in a joint acquisition with Marubeni (2020)

Where to put a 25% stake

Of roughly ¥190 billion invested, Mizuho Leasing put up about ¥67.2 billion — around half of Marubeni’s ¥120 billion. In the act of buying outright the company it had chosen as a joint-venture partner in 2016, it did not reach for the initiative, accepting instead an allocation that gave Marubeni 75% directly and indirectly. The pattern of climbing aboard a trading house’s deal from the funding side, one year after obtaining a customer base from a bank, appears here as well.

This stake, however, first produced not profit but loss. Two terms after completion the entire ¥10.7 billion of goodwill was written off, and the term after that carried ¥16.1 billion of one-off items including unrecoverable losses on leases into Russia. Events that struck airframe residual values and airline credit at the same time ran for two years after the acquisition. Even so, the company did not reduce its ratio, and in 2024 subscribed to a US$500 million capital increase in proportion alongside Marubeni. A minority stake, one might say, is a place that combines lightness of responsibility with difficulty of exit.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2024

Accepting a 20% stake from Marubeni through a third-party allotment (2024)

Setting two shareholders at the same height

Read only as a strengthening of capital, the decision to welcome Marubeni after Mizuho loses the essential point. What was handed over twice in five years was in both cases voting rights in the 20-plus per cent range — a ratio that falls short of making the company a subsidiary. The two holdings, 23.03% and 4.4% at the end of March 2024, stood at 23.09% and 20.0% a year later. To draw deals from both a bank and a trading house without being absorbed into either group’s orbit, there was evidently no way but to set the two shareholders at the same height.

That said, this equilibrium cannot be described purely as a choice made from strength. A plan calling for ¥150 billion of cumulative inorganic investment needed a counterparty who would thicken its equity, and Marubeni’s roughly ¥50 billion was money answering that need. Nineteen people came across from Marubeni, and in June 2025 two officers including an executive vice-president joined the board. A company born in 1969 from the joint investment of sixteen companies has settled, fifty-six years on, into a shape supported by two large shareholders.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— Mizuho Leasing full history in Japanese →

  1. Mizuho Leasing Company, Limited — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports).
  2. Mizuho Leasing Company, Limited — IR disclosures: medium-term management plans, earnings materials (決算説明資料) and the president’s message.
  3. Full Japanese edition, with sources and detail: the-shashi.com/tse/8425.

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer


Data API

Mizuho Leasing’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/8425/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/8425/history.json History overview
GET /api/8425/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/8425/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/8425/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/8425/executives.json Executives
GET /api/8425/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/8425/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/8425/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/8425/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/8425/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/8425/workforce.json Workforce