Withdrawing from food and local goods to sell men’s suits alone (1967)
What you discard decides what you can build
The 1967 consolidation can be seen less as a retreat to escape a crisis than as the work of redrawing the design of the business on a single sheet. Neither the food wholesaling nor the kimono line may have been loss-making on its own. But so long as the categories sat side by side, the company could give no single answer to the questions of how many tsubo a sales floor should have, which form of purchasing was advantageous, and how much could be spent on advertising. Only once it handled men’s suits alone could the 150-tsubo floor area, the outright-purchase form of buying, and the allocation of 17% of sales to advertising all be decided on the same yardstick. It appears that the judgement about what to discard was what set the range of what could be built.
Nor is it easy to overlook that a small company in its third year re-selected its categories using only two measures: the goal of being the best in Japan, and profitability. This was a judgement made in an era without market research or competitive analysis; that it worked was an outcome, not an inevitability. Still, given that Aoyama Trading went on to choose the opposite of industry practice in suburban siting and in outright purchasing alike, the 1967 clean-up is the first instance of that way of choosing. Defend by adding categories, or attack by cutting them — at the first fork, facing the question every retailer meets at each threshold of scale, this company chose the latter.