Nissan Motor

The “Re:Nissan” rebuild: seven plants consolidated, 20,000 jobs cut (2025)

Key decision·2025· Nissan Motor — the full company history →

The entrance to a rebuild that does not chase scale

The core of this rebuild is that Nissan finally reached into the excess production capacity it had long carried, this time including its main home-country sites. In the 1990s it pushed into closing domestic plants at Zama and Murayama too, but those stayed within the frame of holding to a full lineup and depending on the keiretsu. Consolidating seven plants including Oppama and cutting twenty thousand jobs was an attempt to recast the old thinking — keeping capacity in order to secure volume — into profit that does not lean on volume. The disappearance of the merger with Honda, closing the path to making up scale from outside, can be seen as having pushed this decision to cut into its own flesh alone.

Even so, cutting capacity alone does not make a rebuild succeed. The ¥20 billion net profit projected for the year ending March 2027 is a thin one, with cost cuts working first; if sales do not pick up in North America and China, it could fall into a shrinking equilibrium in which falling revenue and thinning profit advance together. What Nissan will sell and earn from, once it has cut plants and people, is a product-and-market answer that has not yet become numbers. The history of capacity cuts running from Zama to Oppama teaches that painful reorganization may be the entrance to a rebuild, but by itself is not the exit. Whether Nissan’s rebuild becomes real will be decided by the move it makes after the cutting.

Revenue and net margin, FY2020–FY2026

Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY2025 onwards — after it was taken.

Source: securities reports

Read the full dossier in Japanese →

The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.

Other key decisions at Nissan Motor


Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer

  • This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
  • Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
  • Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
  • Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
  • Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.

Data API

Nissan Motor’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET. Full specification →

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/7201/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/7201/history.json History overview
GET /api/7201/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/7201/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/7201/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/7201/executives.json Executives
GET /api/7201/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/7201/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/7201/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/7201/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/7201/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/7201/workforce.json Workforce