Converting to a holding company and separating the technology business (2024)
Splitting the vessels does not by itself split the economics
What this reorganization did was to put two jobs of different natures — proposing and implementing — onto separate legal entities and separate profit-and-loss accounts. Step into implementation while holding more than 4,000 people in a single segment and it becomes impossible to see where the high margin is being diluted. Keep them apart and at least it is visible. The way two receiving companies were readied from the outset and the move completed in eight months suggests a deliberate sequence: settle the shape of the organization first, then load the next business onto it.
Separating the entities and growing the separated business are, however, different things. Whether the technology business can be carried at consulting-level economics will be decided by how the contents are run, not by how the vessel is designed. Implementation earns by committing headcount over time — a different kind of management from the small-team, high-rate model the company has relied on. Whether the split works as groundwork, or becomes the entrance through which the parent’s margin is thinned, is left to the numbers still to come.
Revenue and net margin, FY2019–FY2026
Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY2024 onwards — after it was taken.
Source: securities reports
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at Baycurrent
- 2006 A culture where the proposer starts the business — and the turn from integrator to consultancy (2006)
- 2012 The founder steps down and hands the firm to Hagihira Kazumi of McKinsey (2012)
- 2014 The founder’s exit and the Sunrise Capital-led MBO (2014)
- 2016 The September 2016 Mothers listing, designed as a private-equity exit (2016)
- 2016 A change of president after the post-IPO profit drop, and the shift to a hire-more, charge-more model (2016)
- 2026 Replacing per-client man-month pricing with a single role-based rate card (2026)
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
Baycurrent’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/6532/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/6532/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/6532/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6532/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6532/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/6532/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/6532/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/6532/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/6532/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/6532/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/6532/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/6532/workforce.json | Workforce |