Megmilk Snow Brand

Company history

Financial history 2010–2026 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
1925
Head office
Tokyo, Japan (founded in Sapporo, Hokkaido)
Listed
2009
Founders
Utsunomiya Sentaro, Kurosawa Torizo
Formed by
Snow Brand Milk Products + Nippon Milk Community
Revenue · FYE Mar 2026
$3.9B (¥616bn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2026
$208M (¥33bn)
Megmilk Snow Brand: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1925A co-operative that took back the price of milk

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1925Hokkaido dairy farmers found a processing and marketing co-operative; butter production begins in July
  2. 1926The Snow Brand trademark adopted; a central plant opens in Sapporo
  3. 1932~75% of Japanese butter output
  4. 1935First in Japan by raw milk collected
  5. 1941Reorganized by the state as Hokkaido Kono Kosha
  6. 1947Renamed Hokkaido Rakuno Kyodo; designated for deconcentration

The company begins with a refusal. Hokkaido dairy farmers sold raw milk to processors who set the price, so a good season did nothing for them; when the slump following the 1923 Great Kanto Earthquake broke the dairy market, the answer was to pull processing and selling onto the producers’ own side. In May 1925 Utsunomiya Sentaro, who had studied dairying in the United States, and Kurosawa Torizo, who led the farm movement he had trained, founded a limited-liability dairy processing and marketing co-operative in Sapporo. Butter production started two months later in a makeshift plant borrowed from a farmyard, and selling began in October. Almost every other Japanese dairy company was created by capital; this one was created by the farmers who supplied it.

Kurosawa gave the enterprise its creed — kendo kenmin, “healthy soil, healthy people”: a coined phrase arguing that Hokkaido agriculture could only be rebuilt by keeping cattle and returning manure to the land rather than farming crops alone, and still cited today as the founding spirit. In December 1926 the federated co-operatives fixed a single trademark, Yukijirushi (“Snow Brand”), a snow crystal crossed with the pole star, and Snow Brand Hokkaido Butter was born. Exports to Shanghai and Dalian followed in 1927, ice-packed rail cars carried volume to Honshu from 1930, and a prefectural inspection ordinance let buyers choose on grade; by 1932 the co-operative made about 75% of all butter produced in Japan. Film stars advertised it and recipe leaflets taught households what butter was for — selling the food culture and the product together.

By 1935 the federation collected more raw milk than Meiji or Morinaga and stood first in the country. Then wartime control took the enterprise out of the farmers’ hands: in 1941 it was reorganized as Hokkaido Kono Kosha, a state-policy company, and the mechanism by which producers set their own price and found their own market was lost. Renamed Hokkaido Rakuno Kyodo in 1947, it ran almost all of Hokkaido’s milk collection and butter and cheese output — and that very scale made it a target of the Occupation’s deconcentration law. A quarter-century after its founding, the organization that had become the name of Hokkaido dairying was ordered to break itself in two.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1950Snow Brand goes national

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1950Split under the Deconcentration Law; Snow Brand Milk Products founded and listed
  2. 19546P Cheese mass-produced (1962: camembert and sliced cheese)
  3. 1955Yakumo plant food poisoning — 1,579 schoolchildren
  4. 1958Clover Dairy re-absorbed, restoring the pre-split base
  5. 1963Snow Brand Coffee (1968: Neo Soft margarine)
  6. 1983Biological science laboratory — entry into pharmaceuticals

In June 1950 the company was cut in two by antitrust order, and one half was incorporated as Snow Brand Milk Products, keeping the Yukijirushi mark; the other became Hokkaido Butter, later Clover Dairy. Two months after incorporation the new company listed in Tokyo and Sapporo. A farmers’ co-operative had passed through a wartime state company and an Occupation break-up to become a listed corporation. Vitamilk in 1951 started the move from a butter-and-cheese maker toward a full-line dairy, and once the Occupation ended and the policy that forced the split expired, the split was undone: Clover Dairy was absorbed in 1958 and the pre-war production base put back together.

Then, in March 1955, the flag the company stood under was betrayed. Skim milk powder from the Yakumo plant — raw or half-concentrated milk left standing after a machine failure and a power cut, colonized by Staphylococcus aureus — poisoned school lunches in nine Tokyo primary schools: 1,579 cases among 7,638 children. President Sato Mitsugu circulated a letter titled “To all employees” demanding the company start over on quality, and it was handed down as the origin of Snow Brand’s quality control. The company’s own verdict today is that the memory was not kept: letting the lesson of Yakumo fade is what it holds responsible for the outbreak of 2000. Between the two, the same organism went unremembered for forty-five years.

The growth years produced the shelf that Japanese households still recognise — 6P Cheese mass-produced from 1954, camembert and sliced cheese in 1962, Snow Brand Coffee in 1963, Neo Soft margarine in 1968, Natsure plain yoghurt in 1979, string cheese in 1980 — while a co-operative-linked milk distributor set up in 1972 built the farm-federation route into the drinking-milk market. From the 1980s the company pushed outward from milk technology: a biological science laboratory of some 130 researchers opened in 1983 to enter pharmaceuticals, and the man who built it, Katayama Sumio, became president in June 1993 with dairy liberalization approaching in the Uruguay Round. In the late 1990s calcium-fortified milk turned into a hit, and putting a health function on the front of the pack became a method the company would reach for again and again.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2000Two incidents, and the dismantling

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2010 · consolidated
Revenue$4.5B
Net income$106M
Net margin2.4%
FY2010 · consolidated
Revenue$4.5B
Net income$106M
Net margin2.4%
  1. 2000Mass food poisoning from Osaka-plant low-fat milk — 13,420 victims
  2. 2002Snow Brand Foods beef-labelling fraud; the subsidiary is dissolved
  3. 2002Rescue plan: drinking milk separated, Zen-Noh as lead shareholder
  4. 2003Nippon Milk Community founded — the Megmilk brand
  5. 2009Megmilk Snow Brand established as a joint holding company and listed

On 27 June 2000 the Osaka health office logged the first report of food poisoning from Snow Brand low-fat milk. The chain ran back to a power failure that March at the Taiki plant in Hokkaido: contaminated skim milk powder had been redissolved, dried again, and shipped to Osaka as an ingredient. Staphylococcal enterotoxin sickened 13,420 people — the largest mass food poisoning in postwar Japan, caused by the same organism as Yakumo forty-five years earlier, and this time in the milk that reaches the table every morning.

The response made it worse. Recall and public notice were late, the company said everything but the low-fat milk was safe and then added two more products, contradicting the staff already out visiting victims, and President Ishikawa Tetsuro ended the late-night briefing of 4 July with “I haven’t slept” — footage replayed until it settled the verdict. He resigned on 6 July and Nishi Kohei, from sales, took over, closing eight plants and cutting 1,000 jobs, 15% of the workforce. Recovery had barely begun when, on 23 January 2002, the subsidiary Snow Brand Foods was found to have relabelled cheap imported beef as domestic to claim subsidies under the BSE buy-back scheme. A second failure in eighteen months, and this one a fraud: the subsidiary was dissolved that April, the parent’s sales fell again, and ten days after the report Nishi decided to take in outside capital.

Nishi wanted Nestlé as the lead shareholder; the agriculture ministry pushed instead for the drinking-milk business to be merged with the farm federations Zen-Noh and Zenrakuren, and the rescue that emerged was co-operative-led, with Zen-Noh as largest shareholder and Itochu also subscribing. Infant formula went to Nestlé, pharmaceuticals to the Otsuka group, ice cream to Lotte — a dismantling by business line in all but name, leaving the parent a cheese and butter maker. The milk business was spun out in January 2003 as Nippon Milk Community under the red Megmilk pack; it lost $113.9M (¥13bn) at the operating line in its first year and fell into negative net worth, returned to profit in fiscal 2004 after closing plants, and cleared the deficiency in 2006 with support from Norinchukin. Snow Brand, profitable again from fiscal 2003 on cheese, had done the same on its own side. In October 2009 the two combined under a joint holding company, Megmilk Snow Brand, listed in Tokyo and Sapporo — combined fiscal 2008 sales of $5.1B (¥525bn) put it within reach of second-placed Morinaga. Snow Brand president Takanose Tadaaki called it “not a return to the old Snow Brand but a starting point for the next generation,” and said of the incidents: “we must not let them fade. We will carry them for ten years, twenty years.”

Read the full history in Japanese →


2011Rebuilding, and the hundredth year

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2011 · consolidated
Revenue$6.3B
Net income$117M
Net margin1.8%
FY2025 · consolidated
Revenue$4.1B
Net income$93M
Net margin2.3%
  1. 2011The holding company absorbs both operating companies
  2. 2015Gasseri SP strain yoghurt launched as a Food with Function Claims
  3. 2021Snow Brand Beanstalk made a wholly owned subsidiary
  4. 2022Moves to the Tokyo Prime market
  5. 2025Centenary; Next Design 2030 and the “asset transformation”
  6. 2026Production to end at the Kobe, Okoppe and Kawagoe plants

In April 2011 the holding company absorbed both operating companies and became an operating holding company itself, with consolidated sales of $5.7B (¥504bn) in its first full year. Earning power was the problem: the beverages and desserts segment, milk included, barely paid, and operating profit for the year to March 2015 was $88.8M (¥9bn) on a margin in the low single digits. Nishio Keiji, president from 2014, restructured that segment for a $33.1M (¥4bn) improvement inside a year and then shifted to investing in what worked. The two chosen fields were cheese and functional yoghurt: a Gasseri SP strain yoghurt was launched in 2015 as a Food with Function Claims on a visceral-fat reduction claim, and about $49.6M (¥6bn) went into a small-bottle drinking-yoghurt line at the Kyoto plant so that supply could finally keep up with the television and in-store promotion the company had been unable to run. With price revisions improving the mix, consolidated operating profit recovered to $173M (¥19bn) for the year to March 2018, and proprietary ingredients — MBP for bone metabolism, the Helve lactic acid bacterium — were built into a functional-foods business on the same pattern.

What would not improve was milk itself. A long-range vision drawn up in 2017 aimed at an operating margin near 5% and ROE above 8%; the 2019 medium-term plan’s $201.8M (¥22bn) operating profit target was missed at $165.1M (¥18bn) as yoghurt growth stalled and cheese prices were competed down, and the following plan’s goal of cutting the milk deficit by a third was missed too. Milk is hard to differentiate and easy to make a loss leader, so the red ink is structural rather than cyclical, and it could only be worked down slowly through line consolidation and item-by-item review. Through the pandemic — school and foodservice demand gone, household demand up, functional yoghurt spiking on immunity claims and then falling back — the company still held operating profit at $185.4M (¥20bn) for the year to March 2021, put about $65.6M (¥7bn) into a new string-cheese line at Taiki, took infant-formula maker Snow Brand Beanstalk fully in-house in 2021, and moved to the Tokyo Prime market in 2022.

Sato Masatoshi, president from 2021, made “the sustainability of food” the axis of the 2025 medium-term plan: in a country importing roughly 40% of its dairy, keeping supply stable is the company’s job, and a contribution-to-food-sustainability measure was written into how the portfolio is judged. Then, in its centenary year of 2025, the company published a six-year plan, Next Design 2030, whose core is an “asset transformation” — restructuring 20–30% of domestic production sites through alliances, M&A, contract manufacturing and internal consolidation — alongside a dividend payout target raised from 30% to 40% and a 6% ROE goal met partly by unwinding cross-shareholdings. Execution moved quickly: by May 2026 production had been scheduled to end at Kobe, Okoppe and Kawagoe, about 13% of the way to the target, while the Hong Kong base was closed and infant formula made fabless to clear loss-making overseas operations, leaving MBP exports as the growth line. In the year to March 2026 the group ran on three segments — dairy products, beverages and desserts, and feed and seed — with 5,844 employees and operating profit of $122.3M (¥18bn). A co-operative that began with one product, butter, now has to answer a question its founders never faced: not who sets the price of milk, but whether there will be enough dairy farmers, and enough people drinking it, to need the plants it built.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1950

The antitrust split and the founding of Snow Brand Milk Products (1950)

The company that was split, and the company doing the splitting

The 1950 split was not something management wanted. Inside a frame set by Occupation policy, the only discretion left to the company was where to draw the lines — and what it drew is revealing. Snow Brand Milk Products kept the trademark and the core of the dairy business, while leather, meat, pharmaceuticals and seed were stood up as separate legal entities. The order to break the company up was handled not as an occasion to give businesses away but as the work of regrouping them into several companies tied together by shareholdings. The speed of listing barely two months after incorporation reads the same way: a choice made in haste to rebuild a production base that had just been cut down.

Clover Dairy, the company it had been split from, came back in 1958, and Snow Brand Milk Products spread across the country as a full-line dairy. Snow Brand Foods, carved out at the same moment, was dissolved in April 2002 over the beef-labelling fraud. The line drawn in 1950 governed the shape of the group for the fifty-two years that followed.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2002

Separating the drinking-milk business and accepting a Zen-Noh-led rescue (2002)

The six years it took for an entrusted business to come back

What Snow Brand actually chose here was not to sell a business for cash but to entrust a loss-making business to a party able to carry it, and to shrink the parent back to the range where it could pay its way. Cutting the drinking-milk business away stopped the bleeding at the parent, but because the party it went to was a producers’ organization close to non-profit, there was no guarantee it would be made to pay there either. That was the point the trade press kept returning to at the time: the know-how of running a consumer-facing brand was thin on Zen-Noh’s side. Together with the fact that the president’s preference for Nestlé did not prevail, the range of choice was extremely narrow.

In the event, Nippon Milk Community fell into negative net worth in its first year, and it was Snow Brand’s own rebuilding that moved faster. The entrusted business, though, had not disappeared. In October 2009 the two companies combined under the joint holding company Megmilk Snow Brand, and the milk and the dairy products separated seven years earlier were back inside one group. Nishi Kohei’s words of 28 March 2002 — that this was “not a dismantling” — were borne out, at least on the question of where the businesses ended up, six years later.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2009

Merging with Nippon Milk Community to create Megmilk Snow Brand (2009)

A price of 0.2 shares

Look at the terms of the merger: Snow Brand shareholders received 0.2 shares of the holding company for each share held, Nippon Milk Community shareholders 0.48. The two share counts were constructed differently, so no simple ranking can be read off the numbers; what remains is that a company which had brought its own rebuilding within sight and a company only just out of negative net worth formed a single holding company on terms close to equal. The party Snow Brand had turned to for help when it let the milk business go was, seven years later, negotiating a ratio and stepping under the same umbrella.

The merger widened the entrance for raw-milk procurement to nine producer bodies and gave the company’s development capability a route onto the milk shelf. Even so, the losses in milk remained, and the reduction target in the 2022 medium-term plan went unmet. In its centenary year of 2025 Megmilk Snow Brand set out, under Next Design 2030, a restructuring of 20–30% of its domestic production sites, and by May 2026 it had decided to end production at three plants — Kobe, Okoppe and Kawagoe. The work of unwinding the overlap in production assets — divided in 2002, brought back together in 2009 — is still going on, one plant at a time.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— Megmilk Snow Brand full history in Japanese →

  1. Megmilk Snow Brand and Snow Brand Milk Products — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports), chronology and consolidated accounts.
  2. Megmilk Snow Brand official site — company chronology, the history of Snow Brand Hokkaido Butter, and 「2つの事件」 (“The Two Incidents”) and 『雪印八雲工場食中毒事件』 (the 1955 Yakumo plant food-poisoning case).
  3. Snow Brand Milk Products — 「株式移転計画の作成に関するお知らせ」 (notice on the share-transfer plan), 9 April 2009.
  4. Megmilk Snow Brand — earnings briefings and Q&A (決算説明会 質疑応答): May 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2021, 2025 and 2026; the Medium-Term Management Plan 2025 briefing, 15 May 2023; the president’s small meeting, 1 June 2023; the management plan briefing of 14 May 2025; and Megmilk Snow Brand Report 2023.
  5. Shukan Toyo Keizai — 週刊東洋経済 (Toyo Keizai): 11 Aug 2001; 9 Mar 2002; 13 Apr 2002; 11 May 2002; 15 Jun 2002; 7 Sep 2002; 6 Dec 2003; 7 Feb 2009 (“Merging with Nippon Milk — Snow Brand’s thorny road back to dairy”).
  6. Nikkei Business — 日経ビジネス (Nikkei BP): 22 Nov 1993; 2 Oct 2000; 11 Feb 2002; 22 Apr 2002 (Nishi Kohei interview, 「敗軍の将、兵を語る」).
  7. Japan Dairy Association academic consortium — 乳の学術連合, introduction to A History of Snow Brand Milk Products (『雪印乳業史』).

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer


Data API

Megmilk Snow Brand’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/2270/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/2270/history.json History overview
GET /api/2270/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/2270/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/2270/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/2270/executives.json Executives
GET /api/2270/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/2270/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/2270/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/2270/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/2270/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/2270/workforce.json Workforce