Buying Lancer of the US and Gram of Denmark — beverage equipment in North America, refrigeration in Europe (2006)
What comes after choosing to buy time
The core of these two deals was not what to sell overseas but how to obtain an overseas business — a choice of means. A company that had spent twenty-five years from 1981 stacking up local subsidiaries and plants bought, whole, the second-largest American maker of beverage dispensers and a long-established European refrigerator manufacturer. Raising products of its own and building the channels for them would have taken a decade apiece; paying a price shortened it. That the head of the founding family committed to investment on this scale within a year of returning to the company says something, too, about the speed of the decision.
Making a purchased business run as part of one’s own, though, does not end at signing. Three months after the Gram acquisition came a stock market listing in the middle of a financial crisis, at the moment restaurant capital spending was freezing. Whether the range assembled by acquisition really meshed region by region was the sort of thing that would be tested over the following decade and more. How far today’s Hoshizaki — still stacking up acquisitions that fill product gaps region by region — is bound together as a single company is a question the choices of 2006 and 2008 posed and have not finished asking.
Revenue and net margin, FY2001–FY2011
Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY2006 onwards — after it was taken.
Source: securities reports
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at Hoshizaki
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
Hoshizaki’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/6465/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/6465/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/6465/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6465/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6465/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/6465/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/6465/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/6465/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/6465/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/6465/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/6465/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/6465/workforce.json | Workforce |