Kurita Water Industries

Company history

Financial history 2006–2025 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
1949
Head office
Tokyo, Japan (founded in Kobe)
Listed
1961
Founder
Kurita Haruo
Revenue · FYE Mar 2025
$2.7B (¥409bn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2025
$135.6M (¥20bn)
Kurita Water Industries: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1949One chemical, then two pillars

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1949Kurita Haruo founds the company in Kobe; boiler compounds
  2. 1951Boiler-feedwater laboratory — chemicals prescribed by water analysis
  3. 1954Enters water-treatment equipment
  4. 1961Listed in Tokyo and Osaka (first section from 1962)
  5. 1965Business alliance with Itochu
  6. 1967Accounting fraud exposed; Itochu-led rescue
  7. 1973Dividend restored after six years of rebuilding

Kurita began in July 1949 as a ¥300,000 company in Kobe making one product: a boiler compound that stopped scale forming inside steam boilers. What distinguished it from a chemical trader was the second step. In 1951 Kurita Haruo set up a boiler-feedwater laboratory in Nishinomiya, so that the chemical sold was the one prescribed after testing the customer’s water; in 1954 the company began building water-treatment equipment as well. Within five years it held both halves of the business it still runs — chemicals and plant — and the self-description that followed from them, “the doctor of water.”

The 1950s and 1960s were spent turning that into an industry position: head office to Osaka in 1956, chemical-cleaning work spun into a separate company in 1959, a listing on the second sections of the Tokyo and Osaka exchanges in October 1961 and promotion to the first section ten months later, a dedicated research institute in Yokohama in 1962. A 1965 business alliance with the trading house Itochu supplied procurement and export reach. Anything that used water was a potential customer, from a laundry to a steelworks, and in municipal night-soil treatment Kurita became one of the “big three” alongside Kubota and Ebara Infilco.

Then, in December 1967, the accounts were found to be falsified. Hidden accumulated losses of about $7.2M (¥3bn) — 2.6 times paid-in capital — had been buried under percentage-of-completion accounting while a late entrant chased orders at any price. Itochu, the largest creditor, took up a share issue and installed its own vice-president as Kurita’s president. What carried the company through was the chemicals business: unlike plant, it sells again every month for as long as the customer’s equipment runs. Recovery took six years, helped by the pollution-control boom and by large orders from the Kashima and Oita petrochemical complexes; the dividend was restored in 1973.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1971Pollution control, and the purest water in the industry

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1974Tokyo head-office building; dual-headquarters system
  2. 1978First overseas subsidiary — chemicals, Singapore
  3. 1981~40–45% share of ultrapure water systems
  4. 1985Central research institute moves to Atsugi

The pollution-control boom of the early 1970s made a specialist’s market out of what had been a maintenance item. Every factory with effluent or flue gas became a customer, and Kurita’s equipment business widened from industrial plant into municipal environmental works — night-soil treatment, where it expected to take a third of a ¥50 billion market, and municipal waste incineration, where the plants now had to be designed to shed their reputation as ugly, dirty facilities. Scale followed: a Tokyo head-office building in Shinjuku in 1974 under a dual-headquarters system, and a new central research institute at Mori-no-sato in Atsugi in 1985.

The more consequential customer was the semiconductor industry. From the 1970s Kurita supplied ultrapure water systems — water stripped of ions, organics and particles to near the theoretical limit — by pairing reverse-osmosis membranes with its own demineralizers, covering the weaknesses of conventional filtration. Orders came from NEC, Toshiba, Sony and Hitachi, and by 1981 Kurita and Organo between them held the market, Kurita at roughly 40–45%. The relationship set the pattern for everything after it: the customer’s specification became the development target, and each new generation of chips demanded water purer than the last.

Elsewhere the company built the technical depth that a two-pillar business allows — wastewater treatment for coal-fired flue-gas desulfurization, decontamination of corrosion products in nuclear plant piping, process chemicals for refineries. It also took its first step abroad, a chemicals subsidiary in Singapore in 1978. But overseas growth stayed slow by policy: subsidiaries were expected to invest only what they earned themselves. In 1981 president Nakamura Sadao set a mid-term goal of ¥100 billion in sales by fiscal 1985, with chemicals supplying about 30% of it.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1997Selling water, not machines

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2006 · consolidated
Revenue$1.5B
Net income$90M
Net margin6%
FY2014 · consolidated
Revenue$1.7B
Net income$89M
Net margin5.3%
  1. 1997Ordinary profit falls to $132.2M (¥16bn) on the silicon cycle
  2. 2002First ultrapure water supply contract delivered
  3. 2006Full withdrawal from public-sector construction work
  4. 2010~70% share of ultrapure water systems in Japan
  5. 2013Itochu alliance dissolved after 48 years

The semiconductor downturn of the late 1990s exposed what a company that sells equipment outright cannot control. Ordinary profit fell from $249.1M (¥27bn) to $132.2M (¥16bn) in the year to March 1997, whipped around by the silicon cycle. Kurita’s answer was not to reduce its exposure to chipmakers but to increase it: install the ultrapure-water line inside the customer’s fab, own it, operate it, and sell the water. A machinery maker became a utility. The trade was steady long-term revenue in exchange for carrying the capital cost up front — affordable only because the balance sheet carried no interest-bearing debt and 77% equity, the financial conservatism left behind by 1967.

The first supply contract was delivered in 2002, and plants such as Sharp’s Sakai fab followed. Being resident on the customer’s site also fed back into development, and by 2010 Kurita held about 70% of ultrapure-water systems for Japan’s electronics industry, owned 1,534 water-related patents — the most in the country — and drew more than 80% of sales from chemicals and service rather than one-off equipment.

The same period closed a business. In May 2006 bid-rigging was uncovered on sludge-recycling (night-soil) plants, and that December Kurita withdrew from all construction work ordered by national and local government — not the one product line at fault but every one of the 28 licensed categories, with no transfer to group companies. It cost the company its “big three” position in municipal treatment and concentrated it on chemicals and industrial plant. Growth was sought abroad instead: effluent recycling in water-short China, a dedicated water and resource recycling unit from 2010. The Itochu alliance of 1965, having served its purpose, was dissolved in 2013.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2015Buying the world, and paying for it

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2015 · consolidated
Revenue$1.6B
Net income$86M
Net margin5.5%
FY2025 · consolidated
Revenue$2.7B
Net income$136M
Net margin5%
  1. 2015Acquires BK Giulini’s businesses — a European base
  2. 2019U.S. Water Services and Avista consolidate North America
  3. 2022Reorganized into two markets: general water treatment and electronics
  4. 2023$54.1M (¥8bn) goodwill impairment on Kurita America
  5. 2025Further US impairments and two plant closures

With the domestic market flattening as semiconductor and LCD investment matured, Kurita reversed its frugal overseas policy and bought its way in. It began in January 2015 with the water-treatment, paper-process and alumina businesses of Germany’s BK Giulini, for about $266.9M (¥32bn), then took North America in sequence: Fremont Industries (2017), U.S. Water Services and Avista Technologies (2019), and the precision-cleaning firm Pentagon Technologies (2020). Korea’s Hansu was consolidated in 2017. President Monden Michiya explained the shift plainly in 2017 — growth financed only out of what subsidiaries earned themselves was too slow, so the parent would fund it.

In 2022 the business was recut along customers rather than products, into a general water-treatment market and an electronics market, and the eleven domestic chemicals and maintenance sales companies were merged into two. Consolidated sales rose from ¥189.4 billion in the year to March 2015 to ¥408.9 billion ten years later, with operating profit peaking at ¥41.2 billion in the year to March 2024.

What capital could not buy was integration. In the year to March 2023 Kurita wrote off $54.1M (¥8bn) of goodwill on Kurita America’s chemicals business, the company citing integration work stalled by the pandemic; the year to March 2025 brought further impairments at two US subsidiaries and the closure of two under-utilized plants. ROIC was written into executive evaluation, and under president Ejiri Hirohiko, with the company now a company with a nominating committee, the task is the unglamorous one: making the businesses it bought earn.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1967

The accounting fraud, and Itochu’s rescue share issue (1967)

What was bent was not the judgment but the yardstick

What produced the falsification was an order from the top — secure the work first, worry about margins after the rival has been beaten — and for a latecomer that could not reach Organo in equipment, that was one of the few available moves. The error lay in not letting that strain show in the accounts, under percentage-of-completion recognition. The heart of this affair is better located not in the judgment itself but in the bending of the yardstick by which the judgment’s results were measured.

It would be premature, though, to read the successful rebuilding as proof that the mechanism was fixed. As late as 1975 Kurita was still using the same percentage-of-completion method and was suspected of stretching it. What erased the ¥2.6 billion of accumulated losses was the profit from chemicals and the sudden expansion of the pollution-control market, not any correction of accounting practice. The verdict of the time — seven parts effort, three parts the tide of the era — was another way of saying that Itochu’s share issue and president Kaiishi Shinzo’s policy of opening the books arrived just in time to catch that tide.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2006

Total withdrawal from public-sector construction after the bid-rigging case (2006)

Reading it as cleaning up after a scandal does not go far enough

Read as the aftermath of an exposed bid-rigging case, the breadth of this withdrawal cannot be explained. What was prosecuted was a single field — sludge-recycling (night-soil) plants — and closing that alone would have satisfied appearances. Kurita nevertheless surrendered public-sector work across all 28 categories of the Construction Business Act and stated explicitly that no part of it would be transferred to group companies. Rather than a pledge not to repeat the offence, this can be read as choosing to eliminate from inside the company the very setting in which collusion can occur.

It would not be fair, though, to take this as pure integrity. The public-sector market had already shrunk under falling public-works budgets and intensifying competition, and sales to that sector in the year to March 2006 were below the year before. That the company left its forecast for the year to March 2007 unchanged after deciding to withdraw — and duly landed the year with higher sales and profit — also shows how little weight the abandoned business carried. The “big three” standing, once described as a third of a ¥50 billion-a-year market, had been thinning long before it was given up.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2015

Acquiring BK Giulini’s water-treatment chemicals, and the run of Western deals (2015)

What money could buy, and what it could not

Filing the run of acquisitions under the globalization of the water business misses what kind of decision it was. What Kurita had long observed was a modest overseas policy under which subsidiaries invested only what they themselves earned; paying ¥32.3 billion at a stroke to take on a European business — its people and its sites together — is the exact opposite of that. The core of the decision lies here: a company that had sharpened its technology by getting inside its domestic customers’ plants switched to securing, first of all with capital, the customers it meant to get close to.

What capital bought, however, reached only as far as the customer base and the production sites. Selling European chemicals in Japan stalled in evaluation testing and regulatory review; in North America the post-acquisition integration did not run as planned, and the year to March 2023 saw ¥7.6 billion of goodwill written off at Kurita America’s water-treatment chemicals business. The work of making the assembled businesses operate as one company was left behind as a task for the European and North American regional organizations. An acquisition may buy time, but it cannot buy the time that integration itself requires.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— Kurita Water Industries full history in Japanese →

  1. Kurita Water Industries — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports), including the corporate-history, officers, business-combination and goodwill notes.
  2. Kurita Water Industries — management briefing Q&A (経営説明会質疑応答要旨), 27 Dec 2016 and 24 May 2017; results and mid-term plan briefing Q&A, 12 May 2023.
  3. Kurita Water Industries — news releases (ニュースリリース): 23 May 2006 (apology over the criminal complaint); 27 Dec 2006 — withdrawal from public-sector construction; 21 Sep 2007 — business suspension order.
  4. Securities Analysts Journal — 証券アナリストジャーナル, Dec 1981: Nakamura Sadao, “Kurita Water Industries — toward ¥100 billion in sales by fiscal 1985” (lecture summary). NDL Digital Collections.
  5. Nikkei Business — 日経ビジネス, 4 Aug 1975 (“Kurita Water Industries: slack in the run-up to market-price issuance”).
  6. Weekly Toyo Keizai — 週刊東洋経済: 17 Nov 2007 (turning equipment sales into service); 12 Jun 2010 (ultrapure water as a service business); 11 Sep 2010 (water business — effluent recycling as the real prize).
  7. Nihon Keizai Shimbun — 日本経済新聞: 27 Oct 2014 (acquisition of the German business); 5 Jan 2017; 8 Feb 2019 (U.S. Water); 8 May 2023.
  8. Japan Fair Trade Commission — 公正取引委員会, Annual Report for fiscal 2006.

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer


Data API

Kurita Water Industries’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/6370/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/6370/history.json History overview
GET /api/6370/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/6370/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/6370/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/6370/executives.json Executives
GET /api/6370/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/6370/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/6370/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/6370/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/6370/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/6370/workforce.json Workforce