Oracle Japan

Company history

Financial history 2006–2025 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
1985
Head office
Minato-ku, Tokyo
Listed
2000
Parent
Oracle Corporation (US)
Revenue · FYE Mar 2025
$1.8B (¥264bn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2025
$405.6M (¥61bn)
Oracle Japan: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1985A sales office with nothing of its own

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1985Oracle Japan incorporated in Shinjuku, Tokyo — wholly owned by Oracle Corporation
  2. 1990Full-scale operations begin; Sano Tsutomu becomes president
  3. 1992Osaka office; Nagoya follows in 1993
  4. 1994Head office moves to Chiyoda-ku; Fukuoka office opens
  5. 1997Par-value merger — legal groundwork for a listing

Oracle Corporation set up Oracle Japan in October 1985 in Shinjuku, Tokyo, wholly owned and capitalised at ¥1 million, for a single purpose: to sell the parent’s relational database and the software around it. No development function was placed here. The company was, by design, a supply window for software written elsewhere — which is the fact that explains almost everything that follows. Japanese corporate IT was industrialising fast, and the core database market belonged to IBM Japan, Fujitsu and NEC; Oracle’s only weapon on entry was the relational model itself. Full-scale trading did not begin until October 1990, five years after incorporation.

What the company built in the decade after was not product but reach. West Japan (Osaka) opened in 1992, Chubu (Nagoya) in 1993; in 1994 the head office moved to Chiyoda-ku and a western office opened in Fukuoka; Sapporo followed in 1996 and Kanazawa in 1997. This was a nationwide enterprise salesforce assembled from a very small base — Shintaku Masaaki, an IBM Japan man who would later run the company, joined in 1991 as employee number 62.

In June 1997 Oracle Japan merged with a shell company to cut its par value from ¥50,000 a share to ¥50 — pure legal groundwork for a stock listing. The listing had not been asked for by the parent. Sano Tsutomu, president since 1990, had met Larry Ellison when Oracle Corporation was itself short of cash, offered to raise money in Japan, and then kept arguing the case long after the immediate need passed: a Japanese listing, he insisted, was how a foreign subsidiary earned the trust of Japanese customers, shareholders and staff.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1999Listing without letting go

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2006 · unconsolidated
Revenue$788M
Net income$163M
Net margin20.7%
FY2006 · unconsolidated
Revenue$788M
Net income$163M
Net margin20.7%
  1. 1999JASDAQ listing — market cap about $4.3B (¥495bn) at debut
  2. 2000TSE First Section; the parent raises about $8.1B (¥870bn) in the offering
  3. 2000Shintaku Masaaki succeeds Sano as president; Miracle Linux founded
  4. 2001Sales $721.7M (¥88bn), up 33.4%
  5. 2006Group sales channels consolidated into Oracle Japan

In February 1999 Oracle Japan registered its shares over the counter on JASDAQ. A wholly owned subsidiary of a US corporation floating on its own account in Tokyo was close to unheard of, and the debut was violent: a market capitalisation of about $4.3B (¥495bn) on day one, displacing the pachislot maker Aruze as the largest name on the OTC market. Sano’s framing was not financial. “I wanted to declare,” he said, “that Oracle Japan is a company rooted in Japanese society, a company working for Japan.” In April 2000 the shares moved to the First Section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange, capital reaching ¥22.1 billion. In the offering that accompanied the move, the US parent sold down part of its holding and took roughly $8.1B (¥870bn) in cash.

Four months after the TSE listing, in August 2000, Sano stepped up to chairman and CEO and Shintaku Masaaki, then managing director, became president and COO. Shintaku had graduated from Waseda in 1978 into IBM Japan, worked under Sano in the Fukuoka sales office in the mid-1980s, and been recruited across in 1991; Sano kept new business, legal and administration while Shintaku took software and consulting. The same year the company set up its first subsidiary, Miracle Linux (55% owned), to push Linux in Japan and reduce the platform dependence on Microsoft.

The model’s central tension was stated plainly by the parent itself. For the year to May 2001, sales rose 33.4% to $721.7M (¥88bn) and net profit 64% to ¥18.3 billion, held up by telecoms and financial-sector IT spending even after the dot-com collapse. Oracle Corporation’s CFO Jeff Henley called the listing’s greatest benefit “a stronger local identity in Japan,” then added that the parent still owned 75% and would not be losing control — below 66%, he noted, control becomes difficult under Japanese law. Local legitimacy above, undisturbed ownership below: that was the arrangement, and it held. Meanwhile the branch network was finished off — Sendai and Okinawa in 2000, Hiroshima in 2005 — and in 2006 the products of the sibling company Oracle Information Systems were routed through Oracle Japan, consolidating the group’s Japanese sales into one channel.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2007Hardware, then the first turn to cloud

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2007 · unconsolidated
Revenue$856M
Net income$188M
Net margin21.9%
FY2019 · unconsolidated
Revenue$1.9B
Net income$398M
Net margin21.4%
  1. 2007Endo Takao becomes president; shift toward applications
  2. 2008Oracle Aoyama Center completed; head office moves to Minato-ku
  3. 2010Hardware Systems division opens after the parent’s Sun Microsystems acquisition
  4. 2013Sugihara Hiroshige becomes president; cloud-first strategy introduced

In July 2008 the company completed its own building, the Oracle Aoyama Center, and moved its head office to Minato-ku that September — a foreign subsidiary putting its name on a Tokyo skyline. Two years later the business itself widened. In June 2010 Oracle Japan opened a Hardware Systems division selling servers, storage and related services, a direct consequence of the parent closing its acquisition of Sun Microsystems in January 2010. A pure software distributor now had iron to sell, and the vertical-integration strategy — hardware and software engineered together — arrived in Japan as a sales problem rather than a technology one.

Leadership passed through four hands in this period, and the pattern of hiring from Japan’s IT establishment held. Shintaku carried the listing years through FY2006; Endo Takao (FY2007–FY2011) converted the company to a board with statutory committees and pushed the shift from database licences toward applications; Kaneko Tadahiro served a short FY2012 interim; Sugihara Hiroshige (FY2013–FY2019), another IBM Japan alumnus, brought the parent’s cloud-first strategy into the Japanese salesforce in earnest. The Akasaka office, opened in 2013 as the business expanded, was closed in 2023 in the post-pandemic contraction — a small marker of how much the selling model had changed underneath.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2020Selling subscriptions through a licence salesforce

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2020 · unconsolidated
Revenue$2.0B
Net income$447M
Net margin22.6%
FY2025 · unconsolidated
Revenue$1.8B
Net income$406M
Net margin23%
  1. 2020Misawa Toshimitsu returns from IBM Japan as president
  2. 2022Moves to the TSE Standard market — free float too small for Prime
  3. 2025Cloud and licence reach 85% of revenue (FY to May 2025)

In April 2020 Garrett Ilg took over Oracle’s Asia Pacific and Japan region, and that December Misawa Toshimitsu became representative executive officer and president in Tokyo. Misawa is a returnee: Fujitsu first, then Oracle Japan from 1995, rising to executive vice-president, then out to IBM Japan in 2016 as a director and senior managing executive officer, then back to Oracle Japan in October 2020. The circuit among Japan’s three big IT houses is itself the point — the job on offer was not technical but commercial, and it required someone who knew this particular salesforce.

In April 2022 the shares moved to the Tokyo Stock Exchange’s Standard market rather than the top-tier Prime. The reason was arithmetic rather than performance: with the parent holding about 74%, the free float could not meet Prime’s tradable-share thresholds. The structure Sano had won in 1999 — a Japanese listing with the parent’s stake untouched — was still intact, and the exchange’s reorganisation turned it, for the first time, into a ceiling. The company chose not to move the parent’s shares to clear the bar.

The commercial task under Misawa is a conversion, not an expansion: shifting revenue from perpetual database licences, the mainstay since 1985, to monthly subscriptions for OCI (Oracle Cloud Infrastructure) and Fusion Applications. It is visible in the numbers — cloud and licence together accounted for 85% of revenue in the year to May 2025. Forty years after incorporation, Oracle Japan remains what it was set up to be, a Japanese subsidiary selling the parent’s software, but it carries two things no branch office would have: a national sales network built through the 1990s, and its own listed-company disclosure. Whether the customer base accumulated by selling licences transfers cleanly to a subscription business is the open question of the current decade.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1999

Listing in Tokyo while remaining a wholly owned subsidiary (1999)

An unusual model for a foreign-owned subsidiary

The heart of this decision is that the head of the Japanese arm rewrote the parent’s capital policy. Listing locally while remaining a wholly owned subsidiary was rare among foreign-owned companies at the time. What the parent wanted was simply to raise money; Sano tied that to a different purpose — winning trust in the Japanese market — and pushed until the parent was persuaded. It is a case in which one executive’s sheer force of will moved the skeleton of the company, its ownership structure.

That said, most of the fruit of the listing flowed to the US parent, which went on holding a majority. The multi-hundred-billion-yen cash raised in the offering that accompanied the move to the TSE First Section is the emblem of it: the Japanese arm gained its own valuation in the capital market, yet the structure of control did not change at all, and that is where the character of the model shows. Legitimacy through disclosure, coexisting with a concentration of wealth at the parent, would define Oracle Japan’s capital policy for a long time afterwards.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2021

Passing on TSE Prime for the Standard market (2021)

A market segment that re-opened a twenty-year-old question

The core of this judgement is that the model Sano Tsutomu achieved at the 1999 listing — a standalone Japanese listing with the parent’s ownership left intact — turned, twenty-odd years later, into a constraint under a new set of listing standards. What had been a choice made to win trust in the Japanese market by talking the parent round came back, measured against the new yardstick of the Prime market, as a shortage of tradable shares. One can read it as a state in which the company’s actual strength and its institutional position as a listed issuer no longer agreed.

Oracle Japan did not take the route of moving parent-held shares to clear the standard. It chose instead to leave the ownership structure alone and remain on the Standard market. That it did not alter the structure of control even in the face of a sharp fall in the share price suggests the consistency of a company managed, throughout, from the position of being a US parent’s subsidiary. Whether it will make another run at Prime, or keep this capital structure indefinitely, remains an open question.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— Oracle Japan full history in Japanese →

  1. Oracle Japan — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports).
  2. Shukan Toyo Keizai — 週刊東洋経済 (Toyo Keizai Inc.), Feb 1999: “Oracle Japan — the shock of a super-heavyweight rookie.”
  3. Shukan Toyo Keizai — 週刊東洋経済, Mar 1999: interview with president Sano Tsutomu on how Oracle Japan came to go public.
  4. Shukan Toyo Keizai — 週刊東洋経済, Apr 2000: on the cash the US parent gained from the move to the TSE First Section.
  5. Shukan Toyo Keizai — 週刊東洋経済, May 2000: the aim behind Oracle Japan’s first subsidiary.
  6. Shukan Toyo Keizai — 週刊東洋経済, Jul 2000 and Oct 2000: the presidential handover, and a profile of Shintaku Masaaki.
  7. Shukan Toyo Keizai — 週刊東洋経済, Jun 2001: interview with Jeff Henley, Oracle Corporation senior vice-president and CFO; and Jul 2001 on the trials facing Oracle Japan.
  8. Nikkei Business — 日経ビジネス (Nikkei BP), 9 Oct 2000: Shintaku Masaaki on taking the presidency.

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer


Data API

Oracle Japan’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/4716/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/4716/history.json History overview
GET /api/4716/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/4716/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/4716/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/4716/executives.json Executives
GET /api/4716/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/4716/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/4716/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/4716/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/4716/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/4716/workforce.json Workforce