Buying Komatsu Soft to correct a finance-heavy customer base (2000)
Buying the imbalance in order to fix it
What distinguishes the Komatsu Soft acquisition is neither its price nor any novelty of technology, but the fact that the target chosen was the one that filled the buyer’s own weakness exactly. The banking and card customers handed down by its Sanwa parentage were the company’s strength and, at the same time, a reason it found it hard to move outside them. Taking on a manufacturer’s IT subsidiary whole meant acquiring customers and engineers at once — and also taking on a low-margin organisation. When President Funaki described his criteria as “customer base and technology,” that can be read as a statement of sequence: look at what is missing before you look at the price.
That way of choosing largely set the shape of TIS afterwards. Widening the industries it served by acquisition, and using scale to reach for the prime-contractor position, runs unbroken from here to the 2008 combination with Intec Holdings. Each time, the question of how to lift the acquired company’s profitability was left standing. Managing by buying what you lack is fast; raising what you have bought to your own level is not a problem speed can solve. How to handle the gap between the two is the question that began in this period.
Revenue and net margin, FY1995–FY2005
Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY2000 onwards — after it was taken.
Source: securities reports
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at TIS
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
TIS’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/3626/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/3626/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/3626/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/3626/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/3626/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/3626/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/3626/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/3626/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/3626/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/3626/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/3626/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/3626/workforce.json | Workforce |