Putting a pharmacy in every store, and aiming at 70% (2013)
Choosing dispensing as the axis of differentiation
The essential point of this decision lies in not letting a drugstore end as a place that sells goods, but building dispensing in as part of the selling floor. Hokuriku, with its low rate of prescription issuance, the company saw not as a disadvantage but as room left over. It put a dispensing space and a pharmacist in every store and waited for the rate to rise; when the policy currents of separating prescribing from dispensing, and of drug-price revision, pushed drugstore-attached pharmacies forward, the facilities and staff arranged in advance were there to receive it. That the attachment ratio was made a headline metric under a president who is himself a pharmacist also worked as a device for showing, inside and outside the company, that dispensing would not be put off.
A target of 70%, however, is not as easy to reach as it is to announce. Dispensing only works once a licensed pharmacist has been secured for each store, and if the training of people cannot keep pace with the speed of openings, the ratio hits a ceiling. The company’s ratio has risen from about half to just short of seventy per cent, and at the time of writing still falls short of the target. Rather than chasing numbers, the question is how far a demanding function like dispensing can be embedded across a store network. In a drugstore sector competing on price and fresh food, this decision reflects both the possibility of building a business around dispensing as the axis of differentiation, and the difficulty of it.
Revenue and net margin, FY2008–FY2018
Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY2013 onwards — after it was taken.
Source: securities reports
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at Kusuri no Aoki Holdings
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
Kusuri no Aoki Holdings’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/3549/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/3549/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/3549/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/3549/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/3549/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/3549/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/3549/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/3549/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/3549/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/3549/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/3549/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/3549/workforce.json | Workforce |