Kurabo Industries

Company history

Financial history 1951–2026 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
1888
Head office
Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan
Listed
1949
Founder
Ohara Koshiro
Revenue · FYE Mar 2026
$909.2M (¥144bn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2026
$81.6M (¥13bn)
Kurabo Industries: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1888A provincial mill and the Ohara idea of what profit is for

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1888Founded by 131 Kurashiki investors with ¥100,000
  2. 1889Spinning begins; 15% dividend in the first year
  3. 1906Ohara Magosaburo becomes president
  4. 1926Rayon spun out as Kurashiki Kenshoku — later Kuraray

Kurashiki had grown rich as a cotton-growing and trading town, and in March 1888 131 of its wealthy residents put up ¥100,000 to build a spinning mill there, with the largest landowner, Ohara Koshiro, as first president and principal shareholder. Production began in October 1889 on some 4,000 spindles. The operating policy was set from the start: hold down the cost of the plant so depreciation stays light, and pay the shareholders — a 15% dividend was declared in the second half of the first year. Keeping capital spending lean while returning cash to owners became a pattern the company would repeat for a century.

The company survived Japan’s first capitalist panic in 1890, incorporated properly in 1893, and in 1906 passed to Koshiro’s third son, Ohara Magosaburo. He expanded the cotton business — acquiring the Kibi mill, building the Masu mill in 1915 — but is remembered for what he did with the profits. Against an industry whose treatment of women workers was a national scandal, he built company housing, clinics and dispersed family-style dormitories that raised retention, founded a technical school for workers, unified the trademark and converted the spinning frames to individual motor drive. Outside the company he founded the Ohara Museum of Art, Kurashiki Central Hospital and the Ohara Institute for Social Research — a model in which a spinning mill’s capital circulated well beyond spinning.

The First World War brought unprecedented prosperity and the post-war reaction brought a severe slump, which Kurabo rode out on cost reduction under its motto of unity of purpose. Even then it kept expanding: in 1926 it entered the rayon business — but as a separate company, Kurashiki Kenshoku, deliberately keeping an unproven chemical fibre out of accounts already swinging with the cotton-yarn market. That company was renamed Kurashiki Rayon in 1949 and, on the strength of inventing vinylon, became Kuraray, an independent pillar of Japan’s synthetic fibre industry.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1931Depression, wool, war, and a national footprint

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY1951 · unconsolidated
Revenue$43M
Net income$8M
Net margin18.1%
FY1955 · unconsolidated
Revenue$44M
Net income$1M
Net margin3.1%
  1. 1930Depression cuts; labour institute moved to personal ownership
  2. 1936Wool and staple fibre; Tsu mill opens
  3. 1949Listed in Tokyo; Kurashiki Machinery separated
  4. 1951Anjo mill — the industry’s most modern plant

The world depression hit textile demand hard. Kurabo cut output, reduced 5–10% of its staff, cut director pay, and moved non-core work — the Kurashiki Institute for the Science of Labour among it — out of the company and into Ohara Magosaburo’s personal ownership. It was the standard move of a provincial mill in a crisis: detach what is not the business, compress payroll, restore the core. Recovery came with the cotton export boom that followed 1931, and by 1933 Japan had passed Britain to become the world’s largest exporter of cotton cloth.

Kurabo used the upswing to widen its base beyond cotton. It entered wool and staple fibre in 1936, opened the Tsu mill in Mie that March with integrated woollen spinning, weaving and dyeing, and added the Hojo mill in Ehime in 1938. Four mills across Okayama, Mie and Ehime secured its place among the ten major spinners just as the industry consolidated around large firms.

War brought controls and forced combination: Kurabo absorbed three spinning and weaving companies and two dyeing firms, giving it an integrated chain from yarn to finishing, while converting part of its capacity to munitions. It lost roughly 70% of its productive plant by the surrender. Rebuilding was immediate — listing in Tokyo in May 1949, separating machinery production into Kurashiki Machinery in August 1949, and in October 1951 opening the Anjo mill in Aichi, the largest and most modern spinning plant in the industry, which would run for more than seventy years. A New York office followed in 1955, when textile exports were Japan’s principal earner of foreign currency.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1956Fourteen years of adding one business at a time

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY1956 · unconsolidated
Revenue$56M
Net income$2M
Net margin3.5%
FY1993 · consolidated
Revenue$1.4B
Net income$6M
Net margin0.5%
  1. 1962Chemicals — urethane foam at Neyagawa
  2. 1975Net loss of about ¥1.5bn after the oil crisis
  3. 198320% of spinning capacity cut
  4. 1986Enters fluoropolymer processing
  5. 1993The founding Kurashiki mill closes

Kurabo began moving abroad and out of textiles at the same time: a Brazilian spinning subsidiary in 1957, a stake in an instant-food company in 1961, chemical products in November 1962 with urethane foam and moulded plastics, a Thai plant in 1968, environmental engineering in 1970, and electronics — colour management and production control systems — in 1976. There were no dramatic acquisitions in any of it. A plant was built, a division created, a product added, and the sequence simply continued for fourteen years.

What made it work was that the technology came from inside. Pollution-control equipment installed for its own mills became flue-gas desulphurisation systems it could sell; colour matching on its own dyeing floor became a colour management system. The pressure to do this was structural — the Nixon shock of 1971, the oil crisis of 1973, and through the decade the rising technical and cost competitiveness of Korean and Taiwanese textiles.

It was not fast enough to prevent the reckoning. Kurabo posted a net loss of about ¥1.5bn in the year to March 1975, as did other members of the ten major spinners, and in June 1983 it decided to cut 20% of its spinning capacity. The 1980s response combined that shrinkage with two long bets: fluoropolymer processing from 1986, a chemically resistant material suited to piping in semiconductor cleaning equipment, and property from 1990, turning the large sites left by closed mills into rental income. In 1993 it closed the Kurashiki mill where the company had begun 105 years earlier and leased the site to the prefecture as Tivoli Park.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1994The semiconductor supplier that used to be a spinner

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY1994 · consolidated
Revenue$1.4B
Net income$5M
Net margin0.4%
FY2025 · consolidated
Revenue$1.0B
Net income$60M
Net margin6%
  1. 2010Kurashiki Machinery brought back in-house
  2. 2014Fujita Haruya becomes president
  3. 2018Kumamoto site opens; textiles fall into loss
  4. 2024Kurashiki Machinery sold to DMG Mori
  5. 2025Anjo mill closed; chemicals earn half of operating profit

Through the 2000s Kurabo rebuilt textile production around new mills at Kamogata and Tokushima, expanded chemicals into China with flexible urethane foam for car interiors in Guangzhou, closed the Tsu and Okayama mills in 2009, and in 2010 bought back Kurashiki Machinery — separated in 1949 — through a tender offer, settling into a six-segment group of textiles, chemicals, machinery, property, food and electronics.

Textiles then failed for a decade. Fujita Haruya, a descendant of the founding Ohara family, became president in 2014 promising to shift from selling material to selling value, but the segment slid from ¥90.8bn of revenue and ¥800m of profit in the year to March 2015 into an operating loss of ¥900m in FY18, ¥1.7bn in FY19 and ¥1.8bn in FY20 — squeezed simultaneously by emerging-market pricing, a shrinking domestic apparel market and rising raw material costs. A formal restructuring resolution in January 2020 closed the Marugame mill, leaving Anjo as the sole mother plant, and the segment did not return to profit until FY22.

Chemicals, meanwhile, arrived. Fluoropolymer parts for semiconductor cleaning equipment — sold largely to Tokyo Electron, supported from a Kumamoto site opened in 2018 next to the customer’s Kyushu operations — carried the segment to record levels. Nishigaki Shinji became president in June 2024 and spent his first year sorting the portfolio around that one market: Kurashiki Machinery was sold to DMG Mori (renamed DMG MORI Precision Boring), the Guangzhou urethane business was divested, and the Anjo mill — running since 1951 — was closed, ending 136 years of the company’s own spinning as a core domestic operation. About ¥3bn is going into a new building at Kumamoto to double capacity. In the year to March 2025, group revenue was ¥150.6bn with ¥10.3bn of operating profit, of which the chemicals segment contributed ¥66.0bn of revenue and ¥5.0bn of profit — roughly half the total — against textiles at ¥48.5bn and ¥70m. The diversification Ohara Magosaburo’s successors began has, in its 137th year, replaced the business it was meant to support.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1926

Entering rayon through a separate company, Kurashiki Kenshoku (1926)

The distance at which a cotton company touched chemistry

What deserves attention in this decision is less the novelty of the field entered than the choice of where to put it. Kurabo did not add rayon to its own mills; it put it out into a separate company. The consideration at work appears to have been not to mix a chemical fibre whose start-up could not be read into the parent’s profits, which already swung each period with the cotton-yarn market. Turned around, the chance to grow chemical technology inside the company receded by exactly that much. The parent went on being a company that spun cotton.

The way it kept its distance produced, in the end, two companies. Kurashiki Kenshoku grew into a chemical maker that would give the world vinylon and Clarino; Kurabo, thirty-six years later in 1962, entered the non-textile field itself with a different chemical product, urethane foam. In 1936 Kurabo had moved into wool and staple fibre. The company that had sent rayon outside was, ten years on, running a kind of chemical fibre through its own frames.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1930

Moving the Institute for the Science of Labour to Ohara Magosaburo personally (1930)

What a company can hold, and what a person can

As a decision taken during the depression, it belongs to the moderate category. Close the institute and the research disappears; leave it inside the company and it conflicts with shareholders’ interests. What Ohara Magosaburo chose was to move only the ownership to himself and leave the work standing. There is, however, a limit to the scale an individual can carry, and the reliance on outside funding and the move to Tokyo appear to be that limit showing itself. These were six years in which research that had begun as a company welfare function started looking for a way to stand on its own outside the company.

For Kurabo, the year it detached its social enterprise was also the year it began widening the core business again. The founding of Kurashiki Wool in 1935 and the entry into wool and staple fibre in 1936 amount to restarting, in fibres other than cotton, the investment the depression had halted. After the institute left, the company hospital remained in Kurashiki and continues today as Kurashiki Central Hospital. The institute that moved into personal ownership also continues, as the Ohara Memorial Institute for Science of Labour, still studying working people; it marked its centenary in 2021.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1962

Diversifying into chemicals, environment and electronics in-house (1962)

A row of businesses, stacked one at a time

There is no flashy acquisition in this diversification, and no new company either. A plant was built, a division was placed, a product was added — and that procedure simply continued for fourteen years. It was slow, and it did nothing to prevent the loss of the year to March 1975. Even so, during this period a route ran through the company by which the problems its own factories carried were reassembled into products: capital spending on pollution control became flue-gas desulphurisation equipment; colour matching on the dyeing floor became a colour management system. The technology a textile company needed to earn outside textiles came up from the shop floor rather than being bought from outside.

In the figures, the non-textile divisions passed ¥10bn seventeen years after entry, in 1979. It took considerably longer still from there. In the year to March 2025 the chemicals segment recorded ¥66.0bn of revenue and ¥5.0bn of operating profit — roughly half of the group’s ¥10.3bn. Textiles in the same period recorded ¥48.5bn of revenue and ¥70m of operating profit. The urethane foam business begun at Neyagawa in November 1962 had, sixty-three years later, become the side that supports the founding trade.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— Kurabo Industries full history in Japanese →

  1. Kurabo Industries Ltd. — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports) and earnings materials.
  2. Keizai Shunjusha — 『企業の歴史 : 明治百年』, 1968.
  3. Interview with president Nishigaki Shinji — 西垣伸二, 2024.
  4. Full Japanese edition, with paragraph-level sourcing: the-shashi.com/tse/3106.

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer


Data API

Kurabo Industries’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/3106/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/3106/history.json History overview
GET /api/3106/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/3106/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/3106/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/3106/executives.json Executives
GET /api/3106/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/3106/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/3106/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/3106/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/3106/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/3106/workforce.json Workforce