Deodeo and Eiden combine to create Edion (2002)
What choosing a federation meant
To read this combination only as two provincial mid-sized chains huddling together for survival against the two national leaders leaves something out. Both chief executives spoke of the fear that without a certain scale they would not survive — but they also set a target of a tenth of a ¥9tn market, and deliberately placed the holding company in Tokyo rather than in either home city so that other chains could join. It was defence and, at the same time, an opening move to seize the initiative in the industry's consolidation before anyone else. Reading a shake-out as inevitable, they tried to stand among those doing the consolidating rather than among the consolidated: that is the core of the decision.
Most of that ambition, though, did not go as drawn. The merger with Gigas broke within two months, joint ordering through Voice Network never escaped own-brand goods, and the plan to widen the alliance nationally shrank into the reality of finishing the integration of three companies. What is not in doubt is that the ground taken first — two non-overlapping territories held as a solid block across western Japan — became the platform from which the addition of Midori Denka carried Edion to number two nationally. A design for expansion may fail while the foundation laid first still supports the scale that comes later; the Deodeo–Eiden combination can be read as one example of that.
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at Edion
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
Edion’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/2730/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/2730/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/2730/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/2730/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/2730/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/2730/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/2730/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/2730/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/2730/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/2730/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/2730/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/2730/workforce.json | Workforce |