Ezaki Glico

Company history

Financial history 2006–2025 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
1921
Head office
Osaka, Japan
Listed
1961
Founder
Ezaki Riichi
Revenue · FYE Mar 2025
$2.4B (¥361bn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2025
$33.4M (¥5bn)
Ezaki Glico: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1921Glycogen, and a candy sold on a slogan

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1919Oyster boiling-broth analysed at 36–43% glycogen
  2. 1921Ezaki Riichi moves to Osaka; the business is founded
  3. 1922Glico goes on sale at Osaka Mitsukoshi — the founding day
  4. 1929Reorganized as a joint-stock company; toys packed with the caramel
  5. 1933Bisco — “the second founding”
  6. 1945Tokyo and Osaka plants burn; overseas assets seized
  7. 1953Shares go over the counter in Osaka

The company began with something being thrown away. In the spring of 1919 Ezaki Riichi, a druggist’s son from Saga running his father’s medicine trade, watched oysters being boiled on the banks of the Chikugo River and remembered a pharmaceutical journal’s note that oysters are rich in glycogen. He carried off two bottles of the discarded broth, had Kyushu Imperial University analyse the reduction, and was told it ran 36–43% glycogen with iron besides. Sankyo was already selling glycogen as a tablet. Ezaki reasoned the other way: a medicine reaches only the sick, while a confection reaches healthy children every day — so the nutrient should ride in a sweet. In April 1921, aged forty-one, he moved his family to Osaka and started on 60,000 yen of capital, against Morinaga’s 15 million and Meiji’s 7.5 million.

The product was designed backwards from its marketing. The running-man mark was chosen by schoolchildren from five candidates pinned up in a corridor; the slogan 一粒三百メートル — “300 metres in one grain” — was set at 300 because 500 sounded like a boast and 100 like nothing, and each grain was then built to carry exactly that much energy for a 40kg runner. The box was red where the trade’s convention, set by Morinaga, was yellow. Ezaki pushed his unknown sweet into Osaka’s Mitsukoshi department store on 11 February 1922, a date the company still keeps as its founding day, and the next two and a half years consumed cash — a shortfall of 46 yen on a cheque sent him to a moneylender at 15 sen a day, and he told his fourteen live-in clerks to buy nothing new but underwear and clogs for three years. Free two-grain sample sachets, coupons and an honesty-box vending machine borrowed from shrine fortune slips turned it profitable in the autumn of 1924.

What followed was a pattern of near-death and improvisation. A mountain of returns in 1925 left debts of 62,000 yen — 2,000 yen less than the sum that liquidated a rival; the 1927 banking panic took down Omi Bank and cut the company’s cash to 260 yen, saved by a branch manager at Dai-Ichi who opened an account on the spot. Toys packed with the caramel from the late 1920s, and a second founding in Bisco (1933) — a yeast biscuit whose cream sandwich required a fat process the industry had called impossible. Then the war took it all: plants converted to aircraft work in 1944, and both the Tokyo and Osaka works burned in 1945. Standing in the ashes, Ezaki told his staff the largest capital that had survived was the Glico signboard, and sold his 1937 Buick for 175,000 yen to buy starch syrup.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1954Everything, then thirty things

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1954Listed on the Osaka Stock Exchange; Matsushita Konosuke joins the board
  2. 1957Ice cream; chocolate follows in 1958
  3. 1960Chewing gum and curry roux — the “total food” push
  4. 1961Listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange
  5. 1962Almond Chocolate wins its class at the Brussels chocolate fair
  6. 1965Ship-what-sells: 149 items cut to 28, branches to seven
  7. 1966Seven dairy subsidiaries merged into Glico Kyodo Nyugyo
  8. 1975Out-earns Meiji and Morinaga on half the sales

Listing changed the company’s reach. Osaka in 1954, Tokyo in 1961, capital climbing from 120 million yen to 2.25 billion by 1963 — and with the money came range. Ice cream in 1957, chocolate in 1958, chewing gum and curry roux in 1960, then some ten dairy ventures capitalized jointly with farmers and merged into Glico Kyodo Nyugyo in 1966. Matsushita Konosuke joined the board as an outside director at listing and stayed until his death; when Ezaki, having lost his eldest son and designated successor in 1950, spoke of shrinking the business, Matsushita told him Glico was no longer his alone but Japan’s. The logic of the expansion was never market research. Curry and milk belonged inside the company for the same reason the caramel had: they carried nutrition to healthy people.

The cost showed in the balance sheet. A line of four core products in 1958 became 149 items; between the years ended March 1960 and March 1964 sales rose 2.7× to 15.71 billion yen while receivables rose 5.2× and borrowings 6.2×, from 630 million to $10.8M (¥4bn). Pre-tax profit managed only 2.5×. In the year to March 1963 collections came in 1.5 billion yen below sales — the company was producing and shipping without reference to what the shelf actually sold. The share price drifted from 128 yen in January 1965 to 65 yen in July, near par.

At that point Ezaki Riichi, still president, reversed the machine he had built. Ship only what sells through: the divisional structure abolished, prefectural branches consolidated to seven, the line cut at a stroke to 28 items and confectionery held near thirty varieties where Meiji and Morinaga each carried over a hundred. The immediate price was a 13% fall in pre-tax profit. The payoff took a decade: from the year to March 1968 to that of March 1975 sales rose 3.4× while receivables rose only 1.6×, pre-tax profit 7.4×, and borrowings barely at all. Headcount fell 45% to 1,667 against Meiji’s 7,117 and Morinaga’s 5,268. In the half-year to September 1975, on sales of 38.8 billion yen — roughly half of Meiji’s 71.5 billion — Glico earned an ordinary profit of $14.4M (¥4bn) against Meiji’s 3.2 billion and Morinaga’s 1.6 billion, and carried 4.07 billion yen of debt against their 46.8 billion and 28.3 billion.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1976Thailand, extortion, and the discipline of testing

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1970Thai Glico established; production from 1971
  2. 1982Ezaki Katsuhisa becomes president; Pocky sold in Europe as Mikado
  3. 1984The president is kidnapped; the Glico-Morinaga extortion case begins
  4. 1984Tamper-evident safety packaging developed in one month
  5. 1985Sales fall 20%; an operating loss
  6. 1994The kidnapping reaches the statute of limitations, unsolved
  7. 1999Office Glico — unattended snack boxes placed in workplaces
  8. 2000Mousse Pocky suspended two weeks after launch

Having narrowed at home, Glico grew by carrying the same few products abroad. Thai Glico was formed in 1970 on 1 million baht with the Japanese side holding 48%, after staff sent from Osaka established four facts a market survey could not supply: sugar and labour each under a quarter of Japanese cost, an immature but fast-growing market, and no strong incumbent. Three plants went up near Don Mueang by 1976, the third paid for entirely out of its own cash. Sales reached 24 million baht in 1975, Pretz became as widely known as Toyota or Ajinomoto and travelled to villages on the Lao and Cambodian borders, and rivals — deterred by Thai political risk — never followed, leaving Glico a monopoly it had not had to fight for. Europe came next: a 1982 joint venture with Générale Biscuit that made Pocky under the name Mikado.

Then came the event that defines the company in Japanese memory. Ezaki Riichi died in 1980 at ninety-seven; his grandson Ezaki Katsuhisa became president in 1982. On the night of 18 March 1984 Katsuhisa was seized from his home in Nishinomiya and escaped three days later from a flood-control shed on the Yodo River. The extortionist calling himself “the Monster with 21 Faces” demanded 300 million yen, then widened the campaign to Morinaga, House Foods and Marudai — 27 crimes in all. When products were threatened with sodium cyanide in May 1984, retailers stripped them from the shelves; Glico had a tamper-evident heat-shrink wrap designed within a month and installed across its plants by August. Sales still fell a fifth in the year to March 1985, producing a 1.7 billion yen operating loss, and did not recover until 1988. No one was ever charged, and the kidnapping passed the statute of limitations in 1994.

What carried the company out was a method rather than a product: no launch unless a line could be expected to reach 2.5 billion yen a year, and no launch at all before at least three months of test selling in ten shops near the Osaka head office. Almond Crush Pocky took two years and three months from a Shizuoka trial to national rollout and reached 8.5 billion yen. Item count was held near 120 against Lotte and Morinaga’s 400. The same caution then failed in the opposite direction: Mousse Pocky, launched regionally in January 2000, sold a full year’s forecast in three weeks, ran into capacity at half of orders, and was suspended within a fortnight — the European line taking four to five months to duplicate — while Meiji, which had gone first with a rival product, simply added a third line and never ran out.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2001A hundred years, and questions from outside

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2006 · consolidated
Revenue$2.2B
Net income$42M
Net margin1.9%
FY2025 · consolidated
Revenue$2.4B
Net income$33M
Net margin1.4%
  1. 2003Pos-Ca gum; Ezaki Glico USA established
  2. 2011Glico-Haitai joint venture in Korea (2013: Glico-Wings, Indonesia)
  3. 2018TCHO acquired for $35.9M (¥4bn) — written off by 2019
  4. 2019Overseas disclosed as its own segment; fiscal year moves to December
  5. 2022Centenary; Prime market listing; Ezaki Etsuro becomes president
  6. 2024Dalton’s dividend-authority proposal draws 42.9%
  7. 2024ERP cutover halts chilled shipments for seven months
  8. 2025Record sales, falling profit; exit from frozen desserts in Thailand

The founder’s premise — nutrition inside something people eat anyway — was restated for a modern market as functional confectionery: Pos-Ca (2003), a gum with phosphoryl oligosaccharide calcium claiming remineralization, backed by 2 billion yen of advertising and met with a suit from Lotte, which held 70% of the dental-gum market; then GABA chocolate in 2005. Abroad the company bought and partnered rather than exported: Icreo infant formula in 2001, Ezaki Glico USA in 2003, a joint venture with Haitai in Korea in 2011, Glico-Wings in Indonesia in 2013. Not all of it held. The San Francisco chocolatier TCHO, acquired in 2018 for $35.9M (¥4bn), had its entire goodwill written off within two years.

By the 2019 reporting year overseas operations, previously scattered across the confectionery, frozen and dairy segments, were disclosed as a segment of their own — and by 2025 they were the largest profit contributor of six, on sales of 90.7 billion yen, a quarter of the group. The domestic base was rebuilt around them: Glico Nyugyo absorbed in 2015, the fiscal year moved from March to December in 2019, fourteen manufacturing subsidiaries folded into a single company in 2020. In February 2022 Glico marked its centenary and moved to the Tokyo Prime market; Ezaki Etsuro succeeded Katsuhisa after his roughly forty years as president, and the segments were recast in 2023 from five product lines into six businesses.

The hundredth year also brought the two questions the company had never had to answer from outside. In January 2024 Dalton Investments filed four shareholder proposals, noting that return on equity had averaged around 5% for five years while net financial assets of 115.6 billion yen exceeded 40% of market capitalization; all four were voted down, but the motion to let the general meeting decide dividends drew 42.9% support — and a year later Glico proposed the same amendment itself. Meanwhile the ERP programme begun in 2019, its budget swelling to $243.4M (¥34bn) and its go-live more than a year late, cut over to SAP S/4HANA on 3 April 2024 and stopped chilled-goods shipments for seven months across 82 products including Pucchin Purin. Operating profit fell 7.5 billion yen to 11.1 billion for 2024, with $42.2M (¥6bn) of remediation booked as an extraordinary loss; the dairy business lost 6.4 billion. In 2025 sales set a record at 361.4 billion yen while operating profit fell again, to 8.7 billion.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1960

From one nutritional sweet to ice cream, chocolate, gum and curry (1960)

Were widening and narrowing two faces of the same principle?

The expansion of these years is better read not as growth chasing a growing market but as a test of how far the founding principle — service to society through nutrition — could be carried. Because the first choice had been to make food for the healthy rather than medicine for the sick, curry and milk, which lie outside confectionery, could be placed inside the same reasoning. Put the other way: what decided the product range was neither market research nor competitive analysis but a single yardstick the founder held. That consistency was a strength, and it was also what made the expansion hard to brake.

And indeed the items lined up in four years came back as a financial burden, surfacing in the mid-1960s as swelling receivables and borrowings. Glico then set about keeping only what sold among the things it had added. What distinguishes this short round trip between widening and narrowing is that the criterion was not the number of items but which products the company could build up with its own machinery and its own advertising. That a company calling itself a total foods maker remained in substance one that concentrated its resources on a few products sits a little apart from the picture the word “diversification” suggests.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1965

Shipping only what sells: cutting to thirty confectionery lines (1965)

Can you decide to lose sales at the entrance to a boom?

The difficulty of this decision lies in the fact that the mechanism for generating sales was switched off not in the middle of a crisis but at a point when the business still looked as though it were growing. Judged on the single figure of sales up 2.7× in four years, no one would call the management mistaken. What was actually broken was collection and inventory, and putting a hand to that meant profit for the year would fall. The 13% decline in pre-tax profit for the year ended March 1965 can be read as that price, paid up front. That the founder personally took the front line also appears to have helped push a painful reversal through in a short time.

That said, the mould of a few products made in volume can itself become a constraint when a mature market calls for creating new demand. The more the range is narrowed, the more the company’s earnings depend on the lifespan of its existing mainstays. That the Glico of the mid-1970s kept extending the life of standards such as Pocky and Bisco through improvement was a strength and, at the same time, something that narrowed the room to generate a next pillar. How far to hold the discipline of making only what sells, and from where to allocate resources to investment in creating demand — that question of allocation carries through to the Glico that later took on functional confectionery and Office Glico.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2024

Rejecting Dalton’s proposals — and losing part of the stable shareholder base (2024)

Keeping the articles, and persuading the shareholders

One reading of this episode is that the company withstood an activist offensive. All four proposals were defeated, and the board’s stated reasons hold up on the balance between investment for growth and returns to shareholders. Look at the breakdown of the votes, however, and what was contested appears to have been less the numbers on capital efficiency than the procedure — who decides a matter, dividends, that bears directly on shareholders. That the banks and asset managers who voted in favour were questioning the design that leaves the decision with the board, rather than distrusting Glico’s management as such, is suggested by the company itself proposing an amendment to the same effect the following year.

For a company long led by its founding family, a stable shareholder base was also an asset that underwrote freedom of judgement. Once those stable shareholders begin to split their votes item by item, management is forced to build its explanation afresh each time. Glico amended its articles in 2025 and is facing the proposing shareholder again at the 2026 meeting. How a company that has carried a founding principle of serving society through nutrition will square that with the logic of capital — the figure of 42.9% marks the point at which the question arrived from outside.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2024

A 34.2 billion yen core-system replacement, and seven months without chilled shipments (2024)

What stopped was the very joint it was trying to connect

At the centre of this decision was a task hard to avoid in itself: binding back into one mechanism the operations that a merger had left running separately. The plan to carry everything from procurement to finance on a single system pointed toward eliminating the seams that had been filled by hand, and $243.4M (¥34bn) is a sum commensurate with that ambition. But the wider the range being connected, the more processes have to move at once on the day of the switch. That what stopped was shipping from the distribution centres — the very knot it was trying to tie — says something about the character of this migration.

What remains is the figures recorded in the accounts and a cause never stated. The 6.4 billion yen extraordinary loss and the 7.5 billion yen fall in operating profit are on the record in the annual securities report, and the auditors wrote up verification of the migration as a key audit matter. What exactly failed, and how, stays inside the company and has not been put into a form that competitors could learn from. Everyone remembers that the pudding vanished from the shelves; only the reason for it goes unpublished, while the company’s name circulates as the industry’s cautionary tale.

The 34.2 billion yen was also a figure that had grown along with the delay to go-live. Had a second postponement been chosen, the cost would have risen further; not choosing it brought seven months of halted shipments. With a price attached to either road, Glico chose to go forward.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— Ezaki Glico full history in Japanese →

  1. Ezaki Glico Co., Ltd. — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports), including the corporate-history section and the years ended March 2014–2019 and December 2019–2025.
  2. Ezaki Riichi — My Personal History, 日本経済新聞「私の履歴書」 (Nikkei), 1963.
  3. Eighty Years of Companies and Banks会社銀行八十年史 (Toyo Keizai Shinposha, 1955), the Glico entry.
  4. Nikkei Business — 日経ビジネス (Nikkei BP): 2 Feb 1976; 20 Dec 1976; 9 May 1977 (the Glico case study and the Thai Glico report); 4 Mar 1985; 9 Nov 1992; 25 Apr 1994; 14 Feb 2000; 26 May 2003.
  5. Shukan Toyo Keizai — 週刊東洋経済 (Toyo Keizai): 7 Oct 2000; 26 Jul 2003; 24 Jan 2004; 10 Apr 2004; 6 Aug 2005; 10 Feb 2007; 3 Sep 2016; 29 Jun 2024 (the SAP migration); 27 Sep 2025.
  6. Ezaki Glico Co., Ltd. — “System failure at the Group and outlook ahead” and “Board opinion on the shareholder proposals,” company disclosures, 2024.
  7. Nihon Keizai Shimbun — 日本経済新聞, 25 Mar 2025.

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer


Data API

Ezaki Glico’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/2206/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/2206/history.json History overview
GET /api/2206/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/2206/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/2206/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/2206/executives.json Executives
GET /api/2206/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/2206/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/2206/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/2206/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/2206/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/2206/workforce.json Workforce