Founding Secom — from patrol guards to Japan’s first online security (1962)
A company that created not a product but a trade
What this founding shows is not a fight over existing demand but the choice to bring into being a trade — private security — that did not yet exist in Japan. Under the prevailing belief that safety was free, first-year sales stayed small, and it took the national stage of guarding the Tokyo Olympics before paid private security won any social recognition at all. The judgement of two young men who bet on an untapped demand for safety, in a business that could be paid in advance, is what made security viable as a service sold for money.
The second thing visible here is how the weight was shifted from human guarding to machines. Even when orders flooded in after the Olympics, a structure in which payroll swelled with every additional guard could not meet the demand, and Iida moved the centre of the business to sensors, telephone lines and a central monitoring station. Choosing to stay with electronic security through the criticism that followed the Fuchu ¥300 million robbery was, read another way, a bet on a revenue structure that did not depend on people. Within little more than a decade, a five-person company in Shibuya had become an electronic-security firm with alarm bases across the country.
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at Secom
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
Secom’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/9735/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/9735/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/9735/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/9735/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/9735/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/9735/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/9735/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/9735/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/9735/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/9735/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/9735/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/9735/workforce.json | Workforce |