Sompo Holdings

Company history

Financial history 2011–2026 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
2009 · holding company April 2010
Head office
Shinjuku, Tokyo
Listed
2010
Formed by
Sompo Japan Insurance + Nipponkoa Insurance
Revenue · FYE Mar 2026
$35.4B (¥5.6tn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2026
$4.0B (¥640bn)
Sompo Holdings: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

2010One holding company, two insurers

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2011 · consolidated
Revenue$32.9B
Net income-$162M
Net margin-0.5%
FY2014 · consolidated
Revenue$28.4B
Net income$417M
Net margin1.5%
  1. 2010NKSJ Holdings established; listed in Tokyo and Osaka
  2. 2011Life subsidiaries merged as NKSJ Himawari Life
  3. 2012Net loss of $1.2B (¥92bn) — Thai floods and the earthquake; Kengo Sakurada becomes president
  4. 2014Operating companies merged into Sompo Japan Nipponkoa

In April 2010 Sompo Japan Insurance, the industry’s number two, and Nipponkoa Insurance, its number four, moved their shares into a new holding company, NKSJ Holdings, listed the same day in Tokyo and Osaka. The same month Mitsui Sumitomo and Aioi Nissay Dowa combined into MS&AD, leaving Japanese non-life insurance to three megagroups behind Tokio Marine. Motor insurance, the core of the domestic market, had stopped growing; scale was the remaining lever, since a larger book buys reinsurance and runs systems more cheaply per unit. Masatoshi Sato, from the Sompo Japan side, took the first presidency.

What NKSJ did not do was merge the insurers. Two operating companies stayed side by side beneath the holding company, each keeping its own policy systems, claims offices, product range and agency force. The life subsidiaries were combined in October 2011 as NKSJ Himawari Life, but the non-life companies — where group profit actually came from — did not become Sompo Japan Nipponkoa until September 2014, four years and four months after the holding company was created. That delay was the price of a merger of equals: decisions on products, systems and personnel all had to be seen to be even-handed, and so they waited.

The cost arrived at once. Against ordinary income of ¥2.62 trillion in the first year the group posted a net loss of $161.7M (¥13bn), and the year to March 2012 — Thai flooding on top of the Great East Japan Earthquake — brought a loss of $1.2B (¥92bn). MS&AD, born the same month, also lost money in its first year; Sompo lost money twice, with duplicated head-office functions and two separate back offices still running underneath. Kengo Sakurada became president in 2012 and would lead the group for a decade.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2014A third name, and two new pillars

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2015 · consolidated
Revenue$27.1B
Net income$448M
Net margin1.7%
FY2019 · consolidated
Revenue$33.4B
Net income$1.3B
Net margin4%
  1. 2014Canopius acquired — an entry into Lloyd’s
  2. 2015Watami’s nursing-care business acquired
  3. 2016Message Co. acquired; nursing care becomes a segment; renamed Sompo Holdings
  4. 2017Endurance Specialty acquired for $5.8B (¥630bn); Sompo International formed
  5. 2018Four care firms merged into Sompo Care; nominating-committee board adopted

The 2014 merger produced one insurer and, with it, a name problem. The holding company was renamed Sompo Japan Nipponkoa Holdings — twelve characters in Japanese, cumbersome in English — and only two years later, in October 2016, changed again to Sompo Holdings. Three brands in six years: NKSJ, Sompo Japan Nipponkoa, SOMPO. The short name that a merger of equals could not bring itself to use was precisely the name an overseas build-out needed, and from 2016 the group standardized on “Sompo” across its subsidiaries in Brazil, Turkey and Singapore.

With the domestic motor market shrinking, Sakurada went looking for profit outside insurance. In December 2015 Sompo bought Watami’s nursing-care business, and in March 2016, three months later, the care operator Message Co. The two purchases made Sompo one of Japan’s larger operators of paid nursing homes within half a year, and in April 2016 nursing care and healthcare became a reported segment — something no other Japanese non-life group had done. It began in deficit: revenue of ¥119.1 billion against an operating loss of ¥6.8 billion in FY2016. Four care companies were folded into a single Sompo Care in July 2018, and the business only settled into profit from FY2019 — four years after the first deal.

The larger bet was abroad. Announced on 5 October 2016 and completed in March 2017, Sompo bought the Bermuda-based reinsurer and specialty insurer Endurance Specialty Holdings for $6.3 billion ($5.8B (¥630bn)), the second-largest overseas acquisition by a Japanese non-life insurer after Tokio Marine’s HCC deal. Sompo had entered Lloyd’s with Canopius in 2014 for roughly ¥100 billion, but it trailed Tokio Marine in the United States and MS&AD, which had taken Amlin in 2015. Endurance was placed under a new Bermudian holding company, Sompo International, which became the top of the overseas structure; the acquired company itself was wound up and its reinsurance and commercial units gathered under the SI brand. Overseas insurance went from 12% of group profit to 27%, and overseas revenue doubled from ¥294.4 billion in FY2014 to ¥641.3 billion in FY2017. Sakurada framed it as diversifying away from dependence on Japan, and tied John Charman and Endurance’s senior executives to five-year retention contracts.

By FY2019 group adjusted consolidated profit had climbed from about ¥140 billion to ¥225 billion, carried by three legs — domestic non-life, overseas insurance and nursing care — and the company had begun describing itself not as an insurer but as a “theme park for the security, health and wellbeing of customers.” Governance was modernized in 2018 with a shift to a nominating-committee board and a written group CEO structure. What none of it touched was Sompo Japan itself: its agency network and sales culture were left as they were while the group’s profit was rebuilt around them. The overseas book also brought its own fragility, swinging to a ¥6.0 billion operating loss in FY2018 when catastrophes hit.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2020Earning abroad, apologizing at home

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2020 · consolidated
Revenue$35.2B
Net income$1.1B
Net margin3.3%
FY2023 · consolidated
Revenue$32.2B
Net income$188M
Net margin0.6%
  1. 2022Hurricane Ian — $424M (¥56bn) of losses; net profit down about 88%
  2. 2022¥200 billion of additional capital transferred to Sompo International
  3. 2023BigMotor fraudulent-claims scandal engulfs Sompo Japan
  4. 2023Record net profit of $3.0B (¥416bn); overseas segment profit overtakes domestic non-life

In September 2022 Hurricane Ian came ashore in Florida and cost Sompo $424M (¥56bn). Net profit attributable to owners fell to ¥26.4 billion for the year, an 88% collapse from ¥224.8 billion. The overseas shift had changed how shocks travelled: a catastrophe in the United States now ran straight into the consolidated line, and a single year of bad underwriting could erase most of the group’s profit.

Mikio Okumura, president since 2022, argued that on the portfolio of seven or eight years earlier the same storm would have cost well over ¥100 billion. Since the Endurance integration Sompo had rebuilt its reinsurance programme and rebalanced its lines, holding down North American property, so that a loss comparable in gross terms to the 2017 hurricane season came to roughly a third of the earned-premium ratio it had then. The recovery mechanism was rate: SI’s commercial book achieved a 5.4% rate increase in FY2023, and with an asset duration under four years, rising US yields fed quickly into book yield — helped by the ¥200 billion of additional capital transferred to SI in October 2022. FY2023 net profit reached a record ¥416.0 billion, and overseas insurance earned ¥237.6 billion against domestic non-life’s ¥109.7 billion.

In that same record year, the untouched core produced the scandal. Sompo Japan was found to have tolerated padded repair invoices from the used-car chain BigMotor and kept the relationship going; head-office executives were disciplined. The arithmetic of the group had inverted: overseas underwriting and investment income were covering a hole opened at home.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2024Reform from the balance sheet

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2024 · consolidated
Revenue$33.3B
Net income$2.7B
Net margin8.2%
FY2026 · consolidated
Revenue$35.4B
Net income$4.0B
Net margin11.4%
  1. 2024FSA business improvement orders to Sompo Japan and Sompo Holdings (25 January)
  2. 2024One-for-three stock split; cross-shareholdings targeted at zero by FY2030
  3. 2024Record total shareholder returns of $2.5B (¥386bn), including $1.7B (¥260bn) of buybacks

On 25 January 2024 the Financial Services Agency issued business improvement orders under the Insurance Business Act to both Sompo Japan and Sompo Holdings, and named the practice of cross-shareholdings (政策保有株式) as the soil the fraud had grown in: holding a client’s shares to preserve the relationship had bent the judgement of the sales floor. Okumura created an executive post for internal audit, put the head of internal audit before the board, and reordered the three lines of defence. At a shareholder meeting in October 2024 the outside directors themselves said the control framework “was legally sound in form but was not working effectively in practice.”

The decisive lever, though, was capital rather than culture. Sompo accelerated the run-down of its cross-shareholdings, now targeting zero by FY2030, and routed the proceeds into buybacks: $1.7B (¥260bn) of repurchases within a record $2.5B (¥386bn) of total shareholder returns for FY2024, alongside a one-for-three stock split in April 2024 to widen the retail register. Sakurada’s decade had rebuilt the group’s earnings around everything except the domestic insurer; when the reform of that core finally came, it arrived through the shareholder register — and whether it reaches the sales culture that produced the scandal is still unsettled.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2009

Merging Sompo Japan and Nipponkoa, and founding NKSJ Holdings (2009)

The face of equality and the reality of scale

At the heart of this integration lay a single question: how, in a shrinking domestic non-life market, to secure a scale that neither company could hold alone. Once the earlier three-way combination behind Mitsui Sumitomo had pushed it down to third place, an alliance with Nipponkoa was for Sompo Japan a choice with little room for retreat. But binding that alliance into a framework of equals, while it supplied the centripetal force needed to win approval, also institutionalized the arrangement of leaving two operating companies in place. The logic of gaining scale and the appearance of remaining equals were, from the outset, hard to call aligned.

What followed shows the price in time that the deference to equality paid. The merger of the operating companies slipped by more than four years, and losses from the first year compounded by external shocks demonstrated the weight of choosing to run two structures in parallel. The transitional NKSJ brand gave way to Sompo Japan Nipponkoa and then to SOMPO, while the resources the integration produced flowed outward into overseas M&A, the Endurance acquisition above all. The 2009 decision was an immediate answer to the need for scale — and, at the same time, a step that shaped in advance both the integration costs Sompo would carry and the growth strategy it would pursue.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2016

Buying Endurance Specialty for about $6.3 billion to build a bridgehead in the largest market (2016)

An acquisition that closed the gap in a single stroke

What sat at the centre of this decision was the fear that a group whose mainstay remained the mature domestic non-life business could reach neither the level of return on equity investors demanded nor the global trend toward scale in insurance. With Tokio Marine running away alone and MS&AD having got there first, Sompo moved to fill the blank of the largest market, the United States, with a single acquisition on the order of ¥630 billion. CEO Sakurada’s reading — that having a footing in a large market is itself a diversification of earnings — did, at least in raising the weight of the overseas business, bring a real change to the shape of the group.

That said, taking on overseas underwriting means that the swings of great catastrophes in North America and Europe, on top of Japanese typhoons and floods, are now reflected in one’s own results. Entrusting the transformation of the business to the executives acquired with it, and tying its best people down on five-year contracts, suggests an acquisition that bought “people” about as much as it bought the business itself. How the path of widening an overseas platform from a base in US specialty insurance is to be reconciled with concentrated catastrophe risk and the difficulty of integration — whether the bridgehead of 2016 bears long-term fruit still appears to rest on how well it is run.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2024

Replacing the leadership and rebuilding governance after the BigMotor claims fraud (2024)

The shadow of promoting from the inner circle

What this decision reflects is the gap between form and substance: an institutional design advanced all the way to a nominating-committee board, while in practice concentration in a single leader and the cutting-off of information from the front line were allowed to persist. That the Financial Services Agency insisted on seeing Sakurada out was presumably because it judged the root to lie not in the negligence of any individual but in the machinery and the culture of management that produced such judgements. In remaking, under the pressure of crisis, the governance the group had carried since its founding, one can sense a tension quite unlike that of reform in calm weather.

Even so, the substance of the renewal was in question from the start. Both the new president of Sompo Japan and Okumura, who succeeded to the role of group CEO, had worked long and closely with Sakurada, and whether they could shake off the view that this was a puppet regime became an issue early on. Changing the structure of governance and changing the content of decisions are not the same thing. Having made management responsibility visible through sanctions and personnel moves, how far the culture of sales-first and the bias toward the status quo can be cut off — that answer still appears to be left to the accumulated practice of both companies.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— Sompo Holdings full history in Japanese →

  1. Sompo Holdings, Inc. — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports).
  2. Sompo Holdings, Inc. — earnings briefings (決算説明会), including FY24 Q2.
  3. Weekly Toyo Keizai — 週刊東洋経済, 22 October 2016: “Sompo’s all-or-nothing move — an acquisition that lands a British insurance king” (Mizuochi Takahiro).
  4. Weekly Toyo Keizai — 週刊東洋経済, 10 December 2016: interview with Sakurada Kengo, Group CEO, Sompo Holdings, on the ¥630 billion-plus acquisition and the bridgehead in the US market.
  5. Financial Services Agency — business improvement orders to Sompo Japan Insurance and Sompo Holdings under the Insurance Business Act, 25 January 2024.

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer


Data API

Sompo Holdings’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/8630/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/8630/history.json History overview
GET /api/8630/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/8630/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/8630/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/8630/executives.json Executives
GET /api/8630/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/8630/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/8630/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/8630/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/8630/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/8630/workforce.json Workforce