Daiwa Securities Group

Company history

Financial history 1965–2026 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
1902
Head office
Tokyo, Japan (founded in Osaka)
Listed
1961
Founder
Fujimoto Seibei
Revenue · FYE Mar 2026
$9.3B (¥1.47tn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2026
$1.1B (¥175bn)
Daiwa Securities Group: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1902A rice merchant’s money, and Japan’s first bill broker

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1902Fujimoto Bill Broker founded in Osaka — the start of Japan’s call money market
  2. 1904Treasury bonds exported to London — Japan’s first international securities trade
  3. 1907Renamed Fujimoto Bill Broker Bank; securities added to its charter
  4. 1933Banking abandoned; the firm becomes a securities house
  5. 1937Japan’s first unit trust
  6. 1943Merger with Nippon Trust Bank creates Daiwa Securities

Daiwa did not begin as a brokerage. Its source is Fujimoto Shoten, one of Osaka’s largest rice wholesalers, which moved into finance as the Meiji economy took shape; the family opened a bank in 1895, and in May 1902 Fujimoto Seibei founded Fujimoto Bill Broker in Osaka on a simple observation — Japanese banks had no domestic market in which to raise short-term funds. Dealing in call money and bills rather than shares, the firm effectively opened Japan’s call money market. Branches followed in Kobe, Kyoto, Nagoya and Tokyo within a year.

Securities came in through the same door. When the Russo-Japanese War broke out in 1904, Seibei bought government treasury bonds and exported them to London, handling some ¥170 million — the firm’s first substantial securities business and, at the same time, Japan’s first international securities transaction. Incorporated in 1906, it was renamed Fujimoto Bill Broker Bank in 1907 when the government ruled that bill broking fell under the Banking Ordinance, and wrote securities dealing into its charter alongside call money and banking. The 1909 collapse of Dai-Nippon Sugar, its largest client, nearly took the firm with it; Seibei stepped down and Hiraga Bin rebuilt it, pushing from 1911 into underwriting public and corporate bonds and, from 1917, into re-importing Japan’s foreign-currency bonds through offices in New York, London and Amsterdam.

The 1927 revision of the Banking Act forced the choice that made the company what it is: bill broking had to be separated from banking, and Fujimoto had to be either a bank or a securities firm. It gave up the bank. In 1933 it dropped banking and became Fujimoto Bill Broker Securities — though it kept brokering call money, its founding trade, until the Securities and Exchange Act ended it in 1948. Four years after the switch it invented Japan’s first unit trust, studying a structure with no domestic precedent and launching the Fujimoto Securities Investment Association in July 1937. Wartime consolidation did the rest: renamed Fujimoto Securities in 1942, it merged as an equal with Nippon Trust Bank in December 1943 to form Daiwa Securities, with capital of ¥18.75 million and a head office moved from Osaka to Tokyo.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1944A run of “Japan’s first” products

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY1965 · unconsolidated
Revenue$44M
Net income$278K
Net margin0.6%
FY1980 · unconsolidated
Revenue$533M
Net income$55M
Net margin10.3%
  1. 1948Japan’s first convertible bond; short-term money dealing ends
  2. 1952Japan’s first open-end investment trust
  3. 1954“Tsumitate Open” — the first dollar-cost-averaging plan in Japan
  4. 1959New York representative office
  5. 1961Listed on the second sections in Tokyo, Osaka and Nagoya
  6. 1971Lead manager of the first Asian dollar bond
  7. 1977First Euroyen bond (European Investment Bank)

Postwar reconstruction started with the balance sheet — capital written down to ¥9.6 million in July 1948, then raised repeatedly through the 1950s — and with the loss of the founding business, as the 1948 Securities and Exchange Act ended short-term money dealing and the bill-broking operation was sold off in 1949. What replaced it was product invention. A privately placed issue in August 1948 was Japan’s first convertible bond; in June 1952 Daiwa designed and launched Japan’s first open-end investment trust, fixing the drawbacks of the semi-closed form then in use; and in June 1954 it started “Tsumitate Open,” the first accumulation plan in Japan built on dollar-cost averaging. By mid-1955 it was managing more than ¥30 billion across the two trust formats, with 1,900 staff and fifty-five offices.

The pattern hardened into a strategy. As a clear number two to Nomura, Daiwa could not win a branch-by-branch retail war, but it could import financial structures faster than anyone else and translate them for Japanese investors — fewer people, more differentiation. A New York representative office opened in 1959, London in 1964, subsidiaries in Hong Kong in 1970 and Singapore in 1972; the firm was licensed as an integrated securities company in 1968 and moved to the First Section of the Tokyo, Osaka and Nagoya exchanges in 1970.

The lead in international product was real, not rhetorical. Daiwa was lead manager of the first Asian dollar bond in 1971, sold the Dreyfus Fund in 1973 as the first foreign investment trust distributed in Japan, and underwrote the first Euroyen bond in 1977. From the Asian dollar market’s birth to October 1981 Daiwa led 37 issues against Nomura’s seven and Yamaichi’s four; in Euroyen bonds over the same period it managed eight against Nomura’s four. At home it earned a different reputation: it cut costs ahead of rivals through the securities slump to 1965, becoming known as “the solidly run Daiwa,” put in online systems early, and in 1975 set up the computing subsidiary that would become the Daiwa Institute of Research.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1981The number two’s weak spot, and a bank’s capital

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY1981 · unconsolidated
Revenue$718M
Net income$89M
Net margin12.4%
FY1998 · consolidated
Revenue$4.0B
Net income-$639M
Net margin-16%
  1. 1981Doi Sadakane rebuilds morale; record recurring profit
  2. 1984Multi-pronged alliance with Sumitomo Bank
  3. 1987The “Daimyo bond” for the World Bank
  4. 1989Daiwa Institute of Research founded
  5. 1996First in the industry to offer internet share trading
  6. 1997Sokaiya payments surface; Hara Yoshinari made president
  7. 1998Capital alliance with Sumitomo Bank announced

A leadership fight surfaced in autumn 1980 and put Doi Sadakane in the president’s chair. He spent his first year visiting all 94 domestic branches, and replaced churn with a rule that read oddly for a broker: if the customer wants bonds, sell bonds, not the equities on which the firm earns more. Morale and recruiting recovered, and the year to September 1981 produced record recurring profit. But the underlying position was third, not second: equity brokerage commissions of ¥83.1 billion against Nikko’s ¥90.5 billion, ¥12.94 million per employee against Nomura’s ¥16.57 million, net assets some ¥70 billion behind Nikko. The weakness was domestic retail — in the forty regions where the big four competed, Daiwa ranked fourth in eighteen branches in fiscal 1980. It was also the only one of the four without its own research institute, which it fixed in 1982.

The answer to a thin domestic base was a bank. In November 1984 Daiwa and Sumitomo Bank unveiled a multi-pronged tie-up — lending against securities Daiwa held in custody, a shared card — and Doi made the direction plain: “We have blood ties with Sumitomo. We took the long way round through the credit associations, the mutual banks and the postal savings system because Sumitomo was the strongest counterparty of all.” Combining banking and trust functions with securities went faster abroad than at home: Daiwa Europe in 1981, a US trust company in 1986, a UK banking subsidiary in 1987, and in the same year the self-designed “Daimyo bond” for the World Bank, splicing the best of the Samurai and Eurobond forms.

Seven consecutive years of ¥100-billion-class recurring profit ended with the bubble. Net losses ran ¥42.5 billion for the year to March 1992, ¥44.5 billion to March 1995, ¥80 billion to March 1997 and ¥83.7 billion to March 1998 — even as Daiwa became the first in the industry to offer internet share trading in April 1996. Then in October 1997 payments to sokaiya racketeers came to light, and Hara Yoshinari, nineteenth in the executive ranking, was made president overnight. When Yamaichi Securities shut down the following month, rumours that Daiwa too was hiding off-balance-sheet losses cut its share price from ¥728 to ¥390. Hara assumed from the start that the answer was a holding company, and began splitting wholesale from retail. He dined with Sumitomo Bank’s Nishikawa Yoshifumi in December 1997; the alliance was announced on 28 July 1998, the last of the big three to move.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1999Holding company, joint venture, and back to independence

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY1999 · consolidated
Revenue$3.1B
Net income-$1.1B
Net margin-36%
FY2026 · consolidated
Revenue$9.3B
Net income$1.1B
Net margin11.9%
  1. 1999Japan’s first pure holding company among listed firms
  2. 2001Renamed Daiwa Securities SMBC after absorbing Sakura Securities’ business
  3. 2009Joint venture with Sumitomo Mitsui dissolved; 40% stake bought back
  4. 2011Daiwa Next Bank opens; Moody’s cuts the rating to Baa3
  5. 2012Wholesale folded back into Daiwa Securities after 13 years
  6. 2024Shift to wealth management; capital alliance with Aozora Bank
  7. 2026Daiwa Next Bank deposits pass ¥5 trillion

In April 1999 Daiwa Securities transferred its wholesale business to a joint venture with Sumitomo Bank — Daiwa Securities SB Capital Markets, owned 60/40 — and its retail business to a newly incorporated Daiwa Securities, keeping only the shares. The parent became Daiwa Securities Group Inc., the first pure holding company among listed Japanese companies and the first in the securities industry. The reorganisation was carried through the staff as well: everyone formally resigned and was rehired, nine job grades were compressed to four, and in the wholesale company two people on the same grade could differ five-fold in bonus. A consolidated net loss of ¥127.9 billion in the year to March 1999 became a ¥105.4 billion profit the next year as the IT market ran. In 2001 the venture absorbed Sakura Securities’ business and was renamed Daiwa Securities SMBC.

The structure that made the alliance possible also made its unwinding possible. When Sumitomo Mitsui bought Nikko Cordial in 2009 and pressed for control of the venture, the two sides deadlocked, agreed to separate on 10 September, and on 31 December Daiwa bought out the 40% stake for an initial $1.9B (¥174bn). Suzuki Shigeharu chose to restart as an independent full-line house — and to build the missing bank himself. Daiwa Next Bank was incorporated in April 2010 with capital of $1.9B (¥165bn) and opened the following year, offering deposits only as an investment product and sweeping idle cash out of securities accounts and into the group. At the same time Daiwa pushed hard into Asia, designating Hong Kong a second headquarters, injecting some ¥100 billion into overseas units, and paying about $1 billion in 2010 for KBC’s global convertible-bond and Asian derivatives businesses.

The expansion met a falling market. Net losses of ¥37.3 billion and ¥39.4 billion followed in the years to March 2011 and 2012, driven by Global Markets; in November 2011 Moody’s cut the rating to Baa3, one notch above junk. Daiwa shrank fast — cost cuts raised from ¥40 billion to ¥60 billion a year, 500 overseas jobs gone, exits from European equity underwriting, derivatives and prime brokerage — and in April 2012 folded the wholesale company back into Daiwa Securities, reunified after thirteen years. Recovery came quickly, with ¥169.4 billion of net profit in the year to March 2014. Nakata Seiji then went the opposite way from rivals after 2017, opening branches while others closed them, and in April 2024 Ogino Akihiko used that retained face-to-face network to declare the real change: away from the single-product trading model the firm had run on since its founding, toward wealth management measured by the growth of clients’ assets. Capital alliances with Aozora Bank and Japan Post Insurance followed the same year, and Daiwa Next Bank’s deposits passed ¥5 trillion in January 2026.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1998

The Sumitomo Bank alliance and the industry’s first pure holding company (1998)

Between bank and broker, only the holding company remained

What told in this decision was less the alliance itself than the choice of structure that contained it. To take in Sumitomo Bank’s capital, Daiwa adopted a form no one in the industry had tried — a listed pure holding company — and divided retail from wholesale by line of business. Because it had that structure ready before Nomura Securities did, Daiwa converted the market’s turn into profit quickly, and could later expand the joint venture, and then dissolve it, as a rearrangement of subsidiaries that never shook the parent. More than the substance of partnering with a bank, it was the judgement about what structure to reorganise into that made Daiwa nimble through the 2000s.

The distance to keep from banks, on the other hand, can hardly be said to be settled even now. The joint venture with Sumitomo Bank, struck in 1998 as a measure of last resort, widened into a full alliance with Sumitomo Mitsui, was dissolved a little over ten years later, and left Daiwa independent again. Borrow a bank’s capital and take scale, or hold independence and take agility — the question of how the industry’s number two should live differently from Nomura Securities remains open a quarter of a century on. Only the skeleton of the pure holding company has stayed constant, as the base that absorbs the swing. Under a holding company, whom to partner with and what to separate out: the form Daiwa chose in 1998 is still the foundation of the company.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2009

Dissolving the Daiwa Securities SMBC joint venture and buying back the 40% stake (2009)

Attach to a bank, or keep your independence

At the core of this decision lies an old question for securities firms: attach yourself to a bank’s capital in order to take scale, or carry the business yourself in order to keep independence. Daiwa chose the former in 1999, founding its wholesale arm with Sumitomo, and swung back to the latter ten years later by buying back the 40%. Given that the balance broke once Sumitomo Mitsui acquired Nikko Cordial Securities and began to seek control, one can see that a venture dressed as an equal partnership in fact floated on top of a balance of power. The difficulty of holding banking and securities inside one company is concentrated in that tenth-year dissolution.

The price of choosing independence again was not small. The wholesale business it bought back generated consecutive losses in the post-Lehman market, and the amplitude of its earnings has dogged the company ever since. Even so, Daiwa built its banking function in-house through Daiwa Next Bank, reintegrated wholesale into the parent, and redrew its outline as an independent full-line securities house. In an era when bank-affiliated brokers have become the mainstream, the question of what strength Daiwa stands on while keeping the flag of independence flying is one that carries over into the present company as it tries to shift to wealth management.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2009

Founding Daiwa Next Bank: a securities group enters banking (2009)

What it means for a broker to build its own bank

What this decision stepped into was an idea that crosses the boundary between industries: a securities firm owning its own bank. Fujimoto Bill Broker, Daiwa’s source, originally ran banking and securities side by side, and has a history of being forced by the 1933 revision of the Banking Act to choose one and turning to securities alone. A company that set out by giving up its banking licence had, seventy-odd years later, gone and taken a banking licence back. It was not borrowing a bank’s capital through a joint venture, nor allying with another bank, but a choice to place the entrance for customers’ money inside the group.

A design that catches idle funds sitting in securities accounts as deposits can be read as anticipating the limits of a securities model built on trading single products, because it takes hold of the everyday point of contact — money moving in and out of investments. With commissions deregulated and online brokers spreading, the earnings from intermediating trades were thinning; to move toward the wealth-management form that holds customers’ assets for the long term, you need the foundations of settlement and deposits. Daiwa Next Bank was the move that laid those foundations ahead of the turn in the securities business itself. How close can a securities firm come to a bank and still remain a securities firm — now that it holds ¥5 trillion in deposits, that question weighs more, not less.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2024

From single-product trading to maximising clients’ asset value (2024)

Changing not how it sells, but how it earns

What this shift aimed at was to change not the way of selling but the very yardstick of earning. It puts distance between the company and the practice the securities business has followed since its founding — taking a commission each time shares or bonds change hands — and resets the source of revenue on raising the value of the client’s assets. The face-to-face branch network that the Nakata management defended by going against the industry’s grain was carried over as the base of that shift. In the rhythm of a management that ran defending and changing as two separate movements, this company’s continuity and its rupture sit together.

What will be tested is how far the growth of a client’s assets and the profit of the company can be made to point in the same direction. The old model, in which the more trading you encouraged the more commission came in, always carried a structural gap between the interests of the customer and those of the broker. A shift that raises the banner of maximising asset value is also an attempt to declare those interests aligned. As the new NISA widens the base of the move “from savings to investment,” can face-to-face advice show value beyond the fee it charges? Whether the turn away from the way the firm has worked since its founding was genuine will be tested precisely in a market where the tailwind has stopped.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— Daiwa Securities Group full history in Japanese →

  1. Daiwa Securities Group Inc. — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports).
  2. The History of Enterprises: One Hundred Years of Meiji『企業の歴史 : 明治百年』, chapter on Daiwa Securities (Keizai Shunjusha, 1968).
  3. Compendium of Japanese Corporate Histories: Daiwa Securities『日本会社史総覧・大和證券』, 1995.

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer


Data API

Daiwa Securities Group’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/8601/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/8601/history.json History overview
GET /api/8601/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/8601/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/8601/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/8601/executives.json Executives
GET /api/8601/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/8601/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/8601/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/8601/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/8601/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/8601/workforce.json Workforce