Ending the ITW tie-up and cutting to fifteen core products (2002)
Returning the borrowed technology, taking back the customers
The 1967 venture was a transaction that gave up the breadth of the market in exchange for technology. Under those terms Nifco became the domestic leader and listed on the first section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange. The constraint only registered as a cost once Japanese vehicle demand stopped growing — and the 1996 purchases outside the industry were what a company unable to widen its market did instead, hunting for other earnings at home. Dissolving the tie-up ran in the opposite direction from diversification: it was a move to take back the core business’s own customers.
What the company paid to undo it was the can-beverage packaging business and the greater part of a product range that had run to several hundred items. The line of diversification once described as “¥8bn a year from new fields within five years” was replaced here by concentration on automotive components. The customers of KTS, the German company Nifco bought in April 2013, were Volkswagen, BMW and Daimler. Under the 1979 contract, every one of them sat on ground where Nifco was not permitted to sell.
Revenue and net margin, FY1997–FY2007
Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY2002 onwards — after it was taken.
Source: securities reports
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at Nifco
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
Nifco’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/7988/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/7988/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/7988/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/7988/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/7988/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/7988/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/7988/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/7988/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/7988/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/7988/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/7988/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/7988/workforce.json | Workforce |