From relay maker to control-equipment maker — and the world’s first contactless proximity switch (1960)
Making a market where none exists
The heart of this decision is that instead of competing in an existing market, OMRON stepped first into a field where the market itself did not yet exist. What Tateishi chose, in order to escape dependence on the single product that was the protective relay, was not a diversification that followed other companies but the act of defining for himself a demand — automation — for which Japan did not yet even have a word. Developing one control component after another in-house, and getting ahead of the world’s largest firms with a contactless proximity switch, can be read as fixing early a style of management that pre-empts markets through technology.
That said, the pioneer who opens a market does not necessarily take the fruit of it. The contactless switch, too, was followed a few years later by larger latecomers. Even so, the decision that moved the company off the single leg of protective relays and onto the ground of a control-equipment maker was the base from which OMRON later expanded into factory automation, social systems and healthcare. That a founder made the question — create the market rather than chase it — the centre of the business at the age of fifty-five is instructive still.
Revenue and net margin, FY1955–FY1965
Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY1960 onwards — after it was taken.
Source: securities reports
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at OMRON
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
OMRON’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/6645/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/6645/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/6645/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6645/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6645/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/6645/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/6645/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/6645/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/6645/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/6645/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/6645/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/6645/workforce.json | Workforce |