NTN

Company history

Financial history 1957–2026 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
1918
Head office
Osaka, Japan
Listed
1949
Founder
Nishizono Jiro · Niwa Noboru
Revenue · FYE Mar 2026
$5.2B (¥826bn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2026
$81.6M (¥13bn)
NTN: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1918Three letters, split between a maker and a merchant

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY1957 · unconsolidated
Revenue$12M
Net income$1M
Net margin12.1%
FY1971 · unconsolidated
Revenue$160M
Net income$7M
Net margin4.1%
  1. 1918Ball-bearing research begins at the Nishizono ironworks, Kuwana
  2. 1923Tie-up with Tomoe Shokai; the NTN mark begins
  3. 1939Kuwana plant opens — the company’s production core
  4. 1949Listed in Osaka and Tokyo
  5. 1962European sales company in Germany; the US follows in 1963
  6. 1971First overseas plant, in Illinois

Ball-bearing research began in March 1918 at the Nishizono ironworks in Kuwana, Mie prefecture, at a time when Japan imported nearly all of its bearings from Europe. Bearings are a capital-goods business — precision heat treatment, precision grinding — and a provincial workshop could not carry the equipment and the sales network at once. In May 1923 the ironworks tied up with the trading house Tomoe Shokai and began selling domestically made bearings under a three-letter mark, NTN, taken from the initials of Niwa Noboru, Tomoe and Nishizono. Manufacturing and selling belonged to different companies from the start; that division of labour was how a latecomer got into a market the Europeans held.

The bearing arm was incorporated separately in 1927, became a joint-stock company in 1934, and was renamed Toyo Bearing Manufacturing in 1937. War work took it to more than 1,500 employees and Japan’s largest bearing maker, and in 1939 it opened the Kuwana plant that has been the physical centre of the company ever since — flattened by bombing just before the surrender, held under reparations designation until April 1952, and still, in 2025, the site chosen to consolidate the metres-wide bearings built for wind turbines.

In May 1949 the company listed on the first sections of the Osaka and Tokyo exchanges — early for a Japanese bearing maker — and put the proceeds into capacity for the reconstruction boom. Through the 1960s it absorbed other bearing makers into a national plant network, and then went abroad ahead of its peers: a European sales company in Germany in 1962, on SKF’s home ground; an American one in New York in 1963; and in 1971 its first overseas plant, in Schiller Park, Illinois, followed by German production the same year. In a business of heavy, low-value-per-kilo standard parts, making them near the customer is the only real defence against freight and exchange rates.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1972A second pillar, and two recoveries

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY1972 · unconsolidated
Revenue$189M
Net income$7M
Net margin3.5%
FY2005 · consolidated
Revenue$3.5B
Net income$152M
Net margin4.3%
  1. 1972Renamed NTN Toyo Bearing; NTN Corporation from 1989
  2. 1979Early output cuts, early recovery, and entry into CV joints
  3. 1989CV joint production starts in Ohio; France follows in 1998
  4. 2002The NP21 turnaround under Suzuki Yasunobu

The export brand became the company. Renamed NTN Toyo Bearing in 1972 and simply NTN Corporation in 1989, the firm dropped the name it had traded under since before the war so that its sign abroad and at home would be the same. The 1970s had already shown what its competitive instinct was: in the slump at the end of that decade it cut output early rather than holding inventory, turned back to expansion at the first sign of recovery, and got ahead of the shift to front-wheel drive with constant-velocity joints — while a domestic rival that fell into losses had to hand its rebuilding to others.

That second product line became the second pillar. NTN Driveshaft opened in Columbus, Ohio in 1989 to make constant-velocity joints in America, and NTN Transmissions Europe followed in France in 1998. The economics were deliberate: bearings are largely standard parts sold into a price war, so the higher value of drive components was there to carry the margin the bearings could not. From 2002 the company also went into China, in Shanghai, Pinghu and Guangzhou, partly through joint ventures.

Then came a rescue of a different kind. After the collapse of the IT boom and the sudden death of his predecessor, Suzuki Yasunobu — a production man in a company whose presidents had come from banking and administration, and facing a terminal diagnosis of his own — located the cause of the slump not in the economy but in the walls inside the firm. He pushed through the voluntary redundancies no previous president had touched, dismantled the vertical organization, and pointed everyone at a single goal: first in the world in constant-velocity joints. NTN returned to record profits.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2006Europe: the acquisition, the crash, the cartel

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2006 · consolidated
Revenue$3.7B
Net income$168M
Net margin4.5%
FY2013 · consolidated
Revenue$5.5B
Net income-$144M
Net margin-2.6%
  1. 2006Stakes taken in IFA-Antriebstechnik and S.N.R. Roulements
  2. 2008S.N.R. consolidated — fourth-largest bearing maker worldwide
  3. 2009Revenue falls to ¥527.0bn; first of two loss-making years
  4. 2013EU cartel penalties; Okubo Hiroshi becomes president

Selling into Europe was no longer enough. To be designed into a European car, a supplier has to develop alongside the customer, on the ground — so NTN took a stake in the German driveshaft maker IFA-Antriebstechnik in April 2006, bought into the old French bearing house S.N.R. Roulements that July, and consolidated it in April 2008. With manufacturing, sales and development of its own in Europe, NTN became the world’s fourth-largest bearing maker, behind SKF, Schaeffler and NSK; the French company was rebranded NTN-SNR in 2010.

The bill arrived before the benefit. Demand evaporated within months of consolidation: revenue fell to ¥527.0 billion in the year to March 2009 for a net loss of ¥8.9 billion, with another loss the following year, as acquisition goodwill and the fixed costs of automotive plants met a collapse in volume. Integration and retrenchment had to be run at the same time, in the same factories.

Then the same European business produced a second blow. Charges under EU competition law over a cartel in automotive bearings drove extraordinary losses of ¥19.9 billion and ¥32.4 billion in the years to March 2013 and 2014, and net losses of ¥14.2 billion and ¥14.6 billion. A European expansion undertaken to fix the company’s competitive position had delivered, in five years, acquisition costs, a global recession and a regulator’s fine in sequence. Okubo Hiroshi took the presidency in June 2013 with the rebuilding in front of him.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2014Reform, and the end of going it alone

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2014 · consolidated
Revenue$6.0B
Net income-$138M
Net margin-2.3%
FY2025 · consolidated
Revenue$5.5B
Net income-$159M
Net margin-2.9%
  1. 2015Recovery under Okubo — ¥701.9bn revenue, 6.2% operating margin
  2. 2020Net loss of ¥44.0bn, the largest in company history
  3. 2021Ukai Eiichi becomes president; Prime Market listing in 2022
  4. 2024Reorganized by product; ¥35bn of restructuring charges committed
  5. 2026Management integration with NSK under a joint holding company

Okubo’s answer was to move weight away from the price war in original-equipment bearings and toward higher-margin aftermarket and distributor channels. It worked for a while — revenue of ¥701.9 billion and a 6.2% operating margin in the year to March 2015, helped by a weak yen — and the company adopted a committee-based governance structure in 2019. But the underlying exposure did not change. A ¥19.3 billion extraordinary loss in the year to March 2019 produced another net loss, and the year to March 2020 brought a net loss of ¥44.0 billion, the largest in the company’s history, on ¥34.2 billion of mostly impairment charges. The pandemic year that followed lost another ¥11.6 billion. The overseas goodwill built up since S.N.R. and the concentration of sales on automotive customers had come due together.

Ukai Eiichi became president in June 2021, arguing that NTN had to stop simply selling bearings and start selling service — remote condition monitoring of wind turbines and the like. The company moved to the Prime Market in 2022 and recovered to ¥836.3 billion of revenue and ¥10.6 billion of net profit by the year to March 2024, but the three-year plan missed its 6% margin target, and Ukai said so publicly. In April 2024 he reorganized the company by product — bearings on one side, CV joints and axles on the other — so that losses would be visible where they were made, and committed ¥35 billion over three years to clear out, in his words, the projects that had been over-invested in and never became a business.

The plan named for a finish did not end in independence. NTN agreed to a management integration with NSK under a joint holding company — the rival it has faced for a century, once a partner in ventures and then a co-defendant in the cartel case. The logic is plain enough: NTN competes at the front of the field in technology and well behind SKF in margin, and the scale it needs is no longer reachable alone. Whether scale becomes profit, and how much voice the smaller partner keeps in a merger of equals, are the open questions.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1979

From cutting back to ramping up: the reflexes of production control (1979)

Agility, and the structure that made it possible

The core of this decision lay in a single point: under the same external conditions of recession, how to read the timing of production adjustment. Rather than piling up inventory and holding on, Toyo Bearing cut back early, caught the signs of recovery and turned to increased output, and on top of that got ahead of the next source of demand — front-wheel-drive cars — with constant-velocity ball joints. These nimble reflexes can be seen as producing a recovery in sharp contrast to Koyo Seiko, which fell into losses and entrusted its rebuilding to another company. The speed of movement in the middle of the crisis was itself what divided the competitive outcome.

What supported that speed, however, was a one-man structure in which authority was concentrated in a single manager. Strong leadership made possible both the adoption of technology for growth products and the instant decision to cut back; it also left distortions — the absence of a mechanism to bind together small, independently accountable units, and a stalling of personnel development. The ambiguity by which the very structure that led the recovery becomes the object to be corrected shows that the power to get through a crisis quickly and the power to sustain an organization in normal times are different things. The drive components that began with constant-velocity ball joints would grow into a second pillar alongside bearings. How to hold speed and endurance together — that is the question the 1979 recovery left behind.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2002

NP21: breaking the walls inside the company, and returning to record profit (2002)

The walls that an extreme crisis broke

The core of this decision lies in the fact that, in the extremity of his predecessor’s sudden death and of confronting his own life expectancy, he located the cause of the slump not in the economy but in the walls inside the company, and carried out simultaneously the two things that had been treated as sacred: workforce reduction and the reorganization of a vertically divided structure. In a company where the presidency had passed among bankers and administrators, Suzuki, from the production side and outside the mainstream, pushed reform through without being bound by the existing dynamics. Cutting into the voluntary redundancies that his predecessors had been unable to touch, while binding the organization in one direction with the aggressive goal of being first in the world in constant-velocity joints, is where the character of this revival can be seen.

That said, a top-down reform sustained by the tenacity of a man fighting illness owed much to the will of one strong individual. The speed with which walls are broken in a crisis draws praise; how to continue that speed as an institution in ordinary times remains the next problem. The drive components symbolized by constant-velocity joints would become, alongside bearings, the axis of NTN’s subsequent global expansion. How to hand on to the post-crisis organization the power that a crisis gathered into one person — NTN’s revival from 2002 contains that question.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2026

Management integration with NSK under a joint holding company (2026)

The limits of standing alone, and a bet on consolidation

The core of this integration lies in the fact that NTN, which had held up the recovery of its own earning power on a stand-alone basis, sought a way forward not along that line but in merging with a rival of a hundred years. For President Ukai, who had said he would settle the aftermath of over-investment himself, consolidation was not the completion of independence but a choice to seek outside the company a scale and profitability that independence alone could not reach. The pattern of competing for the technological lead in the world while trailing SKF badly on margin can be read as reflecting the wobble in a premise Japanese component makers long held — that making good products is rewarded.

There is, however, no guarantee anywhere that scale converts into profit. How NTN, inferior in both market capitalization and margin, keeps the weight of its voice within an integration that proclaims a spirit of equality — the concrete terms, such as the share-transfer ratio and the allocation of governance, are still to be worked out. The two companies also have a history of drawing closer through alliances and joint ventures, then separating in the wake of the cartel penalties. Whether two companies that have approached and withdrawn can now make up each other’s weaknesses under the one roof of a holding company — this integration poses, in living form, the question of whether a distinguished maker that has won on product can be reborn into a form that also wins as a business.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— NTN full history in Japanese →

  1. NTN Corporation — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports).
  2. NTN Corporation — medium-term management plans DRIVE NTN100 Phase 2 and Final, and earnings briefings (決算説明会).
  3. A History of Enterprise: One Hundred Years of Meiji『企業の歴史 : 明治百年』, “NTN,” Keizai Shunjusha, 1968.
  4. European Commission — decision on the automotive bearings cartel, and related disclosures.
  5. Japanese business press interviews with NTN presidents, 1970s–2020s (日経ビジネス, 日経産業新聞 and others).

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer


Data API

NTN’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/6472/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/6472/history.json History overview
GET /api/6472/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/6472/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/6472/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/6472/executives.json Executives
GET /api/6472/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/6472/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/6472/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/6472/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/6472/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/6472/workforce.json Workforce