Licensing Bühler and Jervis B. Webb: the turn to materials handling (1957)
Technology borrowed, technology kept
Daifuku Kiko could bring in Bühler’s and Webb’s technology because its parent Kanematsu had cut off its funding and it had been driven to the point where its own engineering was the only thing left to rely on. The accumulated deficit had reached ¥60–70 million; roughly 40% of the workforce had been let go and plants had been sold. Masuda Kenjiro talked the other side’s representative round and brought a world-class partner to a company deep in the red. It was the choice of a machine shop with its retreat cut off that opened the road into materials handling.
That said, the tie-ups did not bring stability at once. Localizing the forged chain came with no end of difficulty, and — as the near-collision between the earlier Bühler agreement and the Webb licence showed — holding two lines of borrowed technology at the same time demanded constant adjustment. Even so, the judgement of these years, splicing the forging skills of the founding trade onto transport technology from outside, became the foundation of the specialist maker that would later stretch as far as airports and e-commerce logistics. Where a company borrows its technology, and what it keeps as its own, is where the success or failure of a change of business shows.
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at Daifuku
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
Daifuku’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/6383/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/6383/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/6383/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6383/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6383/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/6383/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/6383/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/6383/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/6383/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/6383/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/6383/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/6383/workforce.json | Workforce |