The Goodman acquisition: full entry into North American residential air conditioning (2012)
What was tested was less the decision to buy than the power to take root
The meaning of this acquisition shows less in the size of the sum than in the choice of entry method. In China, Daikin teamed up with a firm from another industry and built its own direct-sales network; in Europe, it bought up local sales companies one after another to gain its channels. A company that had widened abroad with the flexibility to change its hand market by market chose, in North America, the heaviest move of all — buying the top firm whole. To take on, at the third attempt, a market it had twice retreated from required resolve on that scale.
But buying something whole does not guarantee making it take root. That the model which had worked in China and Europe did not work the same way in North America shows that the success or failure of an acquisition rests not only on price and strategy but on how far you can adapt to the market after you buy. Which method to adopt in which market — this question, which has run through the whole of Daikin’s overseas expansion, rebounded most heavily precisely in its largest acquisition.
Revenue and net margin, FY2007–FY2017
Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY2012 onwards — after it was taken.
Source: securities reports
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at Daikin
- 1952 Turning Korea-War shell orders into air conditioning and chemicals (1952)
- 1994 Noriyuki Inoue’s radical air-conditioning reform: halting diversification (1994)
- 1997 Concentrating on the commercial high end in China (1997)
- 2011 Giving away the R32 refrigerant patents: an intellectual-property strategy (2011)
- 2024 The handover to Naofumi Takenaka: moving beyond the Inoue era (2024)
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
Daikin’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/6367/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/6367/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/6367/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6367/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6367/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/6367/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/6367/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/6367/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/6367/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/6367/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/6367/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/6367/workforce.json | Workforce |