The merger, the closure of Adachi, and consolidation at Tsuchiura (1974)
Land in Tokyo, a factory in Ibaraki
The weight of the decision to close Adachi shows in the fact that the proceeds from the site became the main source of funds for the ¥13.5 billion relocation investment. A company that had posted recurring losses two terms running had no capacity to build a new integrated plant on its own; only by letting go of land in Tokyo and stacking the equipment back up in Ibaraki could the production system be remade at all. Since metropolitan industrial-siting law was blocking even capacity investment, the option of staying at Adachi was thin from the beginning.
Consolidation did not, however, make the company stable. Demand cooled after the oil crisis, operating rates fell, and recurring losses returned in the March 1976 and March 1977 terms — a structure concentrated in a single plant also takes the swings of demand directly. Even so, a line-up narrowed to excavation machinery and integrated production at Tsuchiura left behind the foothold of ¥121.9 billion in sales in the March 1981 term and the top share in hydraulic excavators. That the company handed down a decision to discard and a decision to concentrate within a few years of each other is what defined its outline.
Revenue and net margin, FY1967–FY1977
Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY1972 onwards — after it was taken.
Source: securities reports
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at Hitachi Construction Machinery
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
Hitachi Construction Machinery’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/6305/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/6305/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/6305/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6305/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6305/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/6305/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/6305/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/6305/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/6305/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/6305/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/6305/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/6305/workforce.json | Workforce |