Hitachi Construction Machinery

Into mining equipment: buying H-E Parts and Bradken for the wear-parts business (2016)

Key decision·2016· Hitachi Construction Machinery — the full company history →

How to earn during the years you cannot win on the machine

As a route for a latecomer to catch the top two, what Hitachi Construction Machinery chose was not a performance contest on the machine itself but the side of the business made of parts that wear out and get replaced. That a company stuck below ten per cent share in large dump trucks moved first to secure the demand that reliably falls due at the once-in-four-years overhaul can be read as arranging a way to earn during the years it cannot win on the machine. That it committed roughly ¥80 billion at a time when major mineral prices were at their lowest in a decade and head office was soliciting early retirements is where the character of the judgement shows.

The reading that consumables are resilient to the cycle, however, was only half right. At Bradken, disposing of non-core businesses produced ¥14 billion of restructuring costs, and H-E Parts fell short of plan against competition in the Americas and Latin America. Parts and reconditioning are also businesses that compete on price close to the customer’s site; buying the top brand does not complete them. Even so, that the main battlegrounds of the two acquired companies were the United States and Australia meshed with a shift that took the Americas to 24% of sales. The work of relocating the earning ground to resource economies and the Americas, after China disappeared, can be seen to have started with the purchase of parts companies.

Revenue and net margin, FY2011–FY2021

Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY2016 onwards — after it was taken.

Source: securities reports

Read the full dossier in Japanese →

The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.

Other key decisions at Hitachi Construction Machinery


Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer

  • This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
  • Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
  • Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
  • Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
  • Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.

Data API

Hitachi Construction Machinery’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET. Full specification →

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/6305/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/6305/history.json History overview
GET /api/6305/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/6305/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/6305/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/6305/executives.json Executives
GET /api/6305/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/6305/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/6305/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/6305/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/6305/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/6305/workforce.json Workforce