The Tostem–INAX merger and the holding company (2001)
What was actually inside a union called mutual affection
The combination was described as mutual affection, but the two sides did not want it equally. INAX held 28% of the sanitary-ware market against TOTO’s 64% and could not draw a future on its own; it was chairman Ina Terumitsu who picked up the telephone. Tostem, for its part, had a founder who had spent a decade proclaiming a ¥1 trillion company, a goal put at risk as housing starts fell from 1.63 million to 1.2 million. The conditions for the deal lay exactly where a seller’s dead end and a buyer’s impatience met in the same year.
The ¥1 trillion took until the year to March 2006 to arrive, from ¥833.5 billion in the year to March 2002 — nearly five years, not the year after the merger. Even so, Ushioda built into the holding company a mechanism by which he, as sole shareholder, could examine the presidents of some thirty subsidiaries, seeking the form of governance in the head offices of the old zaibatsu. The order was to make the vessel first and put the companies into it. The name changed to JS Group and the operating company became LIXIL, but the holding-company mechanism remained.
Revenue and net margin, FY1996–FY2006
Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY2001 onwards — after it was taken.
Source: securities reports
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at LIXIL
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
LIXIL’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/5938/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/5938/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/5938/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/5938/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/5938/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/5938/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/5938/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/5938/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/5938/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/5938/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/5938/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/5938/workforce.json | Workforce |