SWCC

Company history

Financial history 1971–2026 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
1936
Head office
Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
Listed
1949
Origin
Spun off from Tokyo Electric (now Toshiba)
Revenue · FYE Mar 2026
$1.8B (¥278bn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2026
$118.9M (¥19bn)
SWCC: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1936A cable arm cut loose from Toshiba

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1936Spun out of Tokyo Electric (Toshiba); incorporated in Kawasaki
  2. 1937Bare copper wire production begins
  3. 1938Adds power and communication cables
  4. 1949National sales network; listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange

In May 1936 the wire-and-cable business of Tokyo Electric — today’s Toshiba — was separated out and incorporated in Kawasaki as Showa Electric Wire & Cable 昭和電線電纜, with capital of ¥1 million. Bare copper wire went into production in August 1937; power and communication cables followed in 1938, giving the new company an integrated cable line within two years. Through the Pacific War it turned mainly to military cable and, unusually, came through the air raids intact: Kigyō no rekishi: Meiji hyakunen (1968) records a moment just after the surrender when it was making roughly half of all cable produced in Japan.

The rebuild was fast. In April 1949 it opened a sales office in Osaka and branches in Sendai, Fukuoka and Nagoya to cover the country, and in May of the same year it listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange; the special procurement boom of the Korean War then pushed output up again. But the shape of the company was already fixed by what the spin-off had not included. Furukawa Electric, Sumitomo Electric and Fujikura each stood on their own mines and copper mills, an integrated supply of the one raw material that dominates a cable maker’s costs; Showa had only the cable plants. It began, and would remain for seven decades, the industry’s fourth pole — never short of demand, never able to set its own prices.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1961Building out for the infrastructure age

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY1971 · unconsolidated
Revenue$172M
Net income$2M
Net margin1.5%
FY1984 · unconsolidated
Revenue$454M
Net income$4M
Net margin0.8%
  1. 1961Sagamihara works completed
  2. 1968Mie plant starts magnet wire; Japan’s first dip-forming copper rod line
  3. 1972Sendai works added
  4. 1990Ebina works — later the optical-fibre and superconductivity base
  5. 2002Power wire and cable business transferred to Exsym

Japan’s growth years were built on cable, and Showa built plants to match. The Sagamihara works opened in December 1961 for communication cable and later took on power cable as transmission voltages rose, becoming the main site for both. A Tokyo head office followed in 1967, and in May 1968 the first phase of the Mie plant began full production of magnet wire — a line handed over from Toshiba’s own Mie works, formalizing the division of labour inside the Toshiba group. The same year Kawasaki installed Japan’s first dip-forming copper rod line; sales for the year to April 1968 reached $60.8M (¥22bn). Sendai was added in 1972, and the company financed the expansion unusually early for its industry, issuing its first convertible bond in 1973, foreign-currency converts in 1979 and warrant bonds in 1988.

By 1990, when the Ebina works opened — later the base for optical-fibre and superconductivity research — the whole cable industry was pushing into optics and electronics with enough fervour that the press called it the “Showa restoration.” The 1992 plan was of a piece with that: move optical-fibre output from a saturated Sagamihara to Sendai and convert Sagamihara into a pure R&D site, set up an optical-LAN venture with six partners, build a new components plant in Aomori, and extend production into the United States, Europe and Southeast Asia. Murata Kaoru took over as president that year.

None of it changed the arithmetic. Through the post-bubble decade the industry faced shrinking demand and swinging copper prices, and Showa held revenue above ¥200 billion on margins that stayed thin. In July 2002 it transferred its power wire and cable business to Exsym — the symbolic restructuring of the period, and an early instance of the move it would keep making: give away the part you cannot earn on.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2006Holding company, crash, and drift

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2006 · consolidated
Revenue$1.2B
Net income$6M
Net margin0.5%
FY2017 · consolidated
Revenue$1.4B
Net income$18M
Net margin1.3%
  1. 2006Moves to a pure holding company; renamed Showa Holdings
  2. 2009Lehman shock — net loss of ¥8.5 billion
  3. 2011Futong alliance; a Chinese group becomes largest shareholder
  4. 2016Nakajima Fumiaki becomes president; restructuring plan
  5. 2017Operating subsidiaries consolidated into one

In April 2006 the company split itself up, moved to a pure holding structure and renamed itself Showa Holdings 昭和電線ホールディングス, with cable systems, device technology and business-solutions subsidiaries underneath. Tomii Toshio, the twelfth president, drove the reorganization, and the first year looked like vindication: consolidated sales of ¥209.1 billion in the year to March 2007. Then Lehman. Revenue fell to ¥184.9 billion for the year to March 2009 with an ordinary loss of ¥4.6 billion and a net loss of ¥8.5 billion, and the following year brought a second consecutive loss on sales of ¥141.4 billion. The equity ratio collapsed.

In May 2011, under Aihara Masanori, the company signed a business alliance with China’s Futong Group and issued shares to Futong’s Hong Kong arm — roughly $75.2M (¥6bn) of new capital that made a Chinese company its largest shareholder, seventy-five years after Toshiba had set it up. The money shored up the balance sheet; it did not fix the business, and the year to March 2013 produced another net loss of ¥6.4 billion. The remaining years went to tidying up what the holding structure had scattered: Exsym absorbed in 2015, the device and solutions companies folded in during 2017.

Nakajima Fumiaki became the fourteenth president in May 2016 and paired restructuring with growth fields — automotive, rail, roads, disaster resilience, medical — hitting the plan’s profit target two years early. Operating margins nonetheless stayed at a few per cent. The fourth pole’s real problem was not the plan but the premise underneath it, and that was left to his successor.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2018Changing the yardstick — ROIC, and SWCC

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2018 · consolidated
Revenue$1.5B
Net income$34M
Net margin2.2%
FY2026 · consolidated
Revenue$1.8B
Net income$119M
Net margin6.8%
  1. 2018Hasegawa Takayo becomes president — the industry’s first female CEO
  2. 2019ROIC adopted group-wide; commodity cable sales merged with Furukawa
  3. 2023Renamed SWCC; holding structure unwound
  4. 2025TOTOKU acquired; Komata Tetsuo becomes president and CEO
  5. 2026Transformation for Growth SWCC 2030 — ROIC management 2.0

Hasegawa Takayo took the presidency in June 2018: a researcher who had joined in 1984 out of a master’s in applied chemistry at Niigata University and come up through superconductivity development — the industry’s first female chief executive, and its first from the laboratory. She inherited an equity ratio of 26.6%, a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.5 times, and a culture she named as the deeper problem: as long as a business was in the black, it was left alone. In 2019 she made ROIC the primary metric for every segment, so that a business earning a profit but not covering its cost of capital became a candidate for exit. The sharpest application was the founding trade itself — commodity cable sales were merged with those of arch-rival Furukawa Electric into a joint venture, SFCC. Up to twenty-five subsidiaries were consolidated, copper wire production moved from Sendai to Ibaraki, AI demand forecasting went into production planning, and what was freed up went to high-function cable for renewables, electric vehicles and data centres. ROIC rose from 5.6% to 12.3%.

The numbers turned hard. Sales of ¥168.1 billion with operating profit of ¥6.2 billion and net profit of ¥3.7 billion for the year to March 2018 became ¥213.9 billion, ¥12.8 billion and ¥8.8 billion by March 2024 — revenue up 27%, operating profit roughly doubled, net profit up about 2.4 times — with the equity ratio back near 47%. A share worth $7 (¥791) when Hasegawa took over rose more than tenfold, and market capitalization went from around ¥21 billion to roughly ¥200 billion. In April 2023 the company dropped both halves of its identity, replacing Showa Holdings with SWCC, unwinding the seventeen-year holding structure at the same time and putting governance, a segment system and ROIC forward as the three pillars of the change.

The second act is growth rather than repair. In March 2025 SWCC acquired TOTOKU, a maker of optical fibre and specialty wire, for about $96.2M (¥14bn), thickening capacity for data-centre cable; in April, Hasegawa moved to representative chairman and Komata Tetsuo — a 1989 entrant from optical communication devices, corporate planning and strategy — became the sixteenth president and CEO. The medium-term operating profit target was raised from ¥17 billion to ¥24 billion and the dividend to ¥180. A March 2026 briefing set out the next plan, Transformation for Growth SWCC 2030, upgrading “ROIC management 1.0” to a 2.0 that weighs cash flow and growth together: operating profit above ¥40 billion on organic growth alone, a margin above 12%, ROIC above 15%, and a ¥2 billion investment to multiply e-Ribbon optical fibre capacity sevenfold. Ninety years after being cut out of Toshiba to make cable, the company runs legacy power and communications alongside renewables and data centres — and no longer calls itself a cable maker.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2011

Taking Chinese capital, and giving up the founding shareholder (2011)

Capital accepted against the company’s own origin

To describe this alliance only as a foothold in the Chinese market is to capture half of it. For a Showa Holdings sunk in two consecutive years of loss since the Lehman shock, with its equity ratio down, the roughly ¥6 billion paid in by the Futong Group had the very practical meaning of propping up damaged finances with outside capital. And the price of it was that the largest-shareholder seat — the emblem of the Toshiba lineage the company had carried since being separated from Tokyo Electric in 1936 — passed to a Chinese company. It can be read as a choice in which financial necessity and the weight of origin crossed.

That said, the alliance did not accomplish the financial rebuild on its own. The net loss of ¥6.4 billion booked in the year to March 2013, the year after the issue, shows that an injection of capital could not by itself reverse the low profitability of the cable business. Real recovery had to wait until President Hasegawa Takayo, appointed in 2018, cut into capital efficiency with ROIC management. Accepting outside capital in the middle of a crisis was a way of buying time; it was not a substitute for rebuilding the business itself.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2019

Making ROIC the metric — and merging commodity cable with Furukawa (2019)

What it means to change the measuring stick

What President Hasegawa Takayo changed was not the line-up of businesses but the stick they were measured with. Against an internal assumption that cable simply is a low-value-added product, she introduced ROIC — which asks how much capital was consumed to earn what was earned — and reset the standard so that a business in the black but unable to cover its cost of capital became one to let go. The thoroughness of it shows in how far she went: the sale of commodity cable, the company’s trade since its founding, was combined with that of its competitor Furukawa Electric.

Management run off a metric, though, carries the danger of shrinking into balance. The company itself acknowledges that up-front investment for growth temporarily depresses ROIC, so that making ROIC the ultimate goal saps business heads’ appetite to invest, and it is now reworking the framework to look at growth and cash flow alongside it. The commodity cable it split with Furukawa will be bought back in full at the end of March 2026 and brought back in-house. A decision to change the measuring stick is never finished in one go; every time what it is applied to changes, the line has to be redrawn.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2022

Ending the holding structure and renaming the company SWCC (2022)

The room opened by striking out the name

What President Hasegawa Takayo folded up was a pure holding structure that had run for seventeen years, and the change of name was the outward notice of that reorganization. Once the operating companies had been consolidated into one, keeping a holding company above them merely inserted a layer between strategy and execution. What the new name — with “Showa” and “cable” dropped — took on was the substance of removing that layer and returning to being a company that runs its own business.

Changing a name does not, however, change a business. What carried the profit growth after SWCC became SWCC was product for power infrastructure; solutions such as AI-based prediction of workplace accidents are still at the demonstration stage. Striking the word for one’s field out of the company name was not a decision that created a new business but one that opened room to create it. Whether the line “not only infrastructure, not only cable” catches up with reality is, as of this writing, still ahead.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— SWCC full history in Japanese →

  1. SWCC Corporation — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports).
  2. Kigyō no rekishi: Meiji hyakunen『企業の歴史 明治百年』, 1968 (the chapter on Showa Electric Wire & Cable).
  3. Nihon no keieisha『日本の経営者:1部上場全企業・社長の経営戦略と人物像』, 1993 edition (published October 1992; the chapter on Showa Electric Wire & Cable).
  4. SWCC Corporation — growth strategy and capital policy briefing (成長戦略・財務資本政策説明会), March 2026.

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer


Data API

SWCC’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/5805/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/5805/history.json History overview
GET /api/5805/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/5805/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/5805/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/5805/executives.json Executives
GET /api/5805/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/5805/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/5805/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/5805/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/5805/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/5805/workforce.json Workforce