Sumitomo Metal Mining

Company history

Financial history 1971–2025 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
1927
Head office
Osaka, Japan
Listed
1950
Founder
the Sumitomo zaibatsu
Revenue · FYE Mar 2025
$10.6B (¥1.59tn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2025
$109.6M (¥16bn)
Sumitomo Metal Mining: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1691The mine that funded a zaibatsu

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1691Mining begins at Besshi, in present-day Ehime
  2. 1876Wet-process precipitation copper; Western modernization under Hirose Saihei
  3. 1905Smelter moved offshore to Shisakajima over smoke damage
  4. 1927Sumitomo Besshi Mining incorporated, ending 236 years of direct operation
  5. 1937Merged with the coal arm as Sumitomo Mining
  6. 1947Zaibatsu dissolution; the group’s metal mines bought out

The Sumitomo house had been smelting copper in Kyoto since the late sixteenth century, and it held an unusual asset for the trade: nanbanbuki, a method for separating silver out of crude copper that no rival could match. That expertise led it to the ore. In 1690 the house located the Besshi deposit, took a licence from the shogunate, and began mining in 1691 in what is now Ehime.

What followed made Besshi something more than a mine. For over two centuries its copper was the cash that Sumitomo distributed into everything else it owned — the machinery works, Sumitomo Chemical, Sumitomo Electric, Sumitomo Forestry, Sumitomo Bank. The 1882 house code called Besshi an imperishable capital asset, and until the 1890s the house was, in commercial terms, Besshi plus a money-lending business. Under Hirose Saihei the mine was rebuilt on Western technology — the French engineers Coignet and Louis Larroque surveyed it and drafted its modernization plan, wet-process precipitation copper followed in 1876, and then rock drills, a dedicated mine railway, aerial ropeways, hydroelectric power, electrolytic refining and flotation. Output rose to among the largest in Japan.

It also produced the country’s longest-running pollution dispute. Moving the smelter offshore to Shisakajima in 1905 did not stop the sulphurous smoke; compensation ran past ¥5 billion in the values quoted at the time before a neutralization plant finally settled the matter in 1939. Meanwhile the ownership form kept changing around the ore. The head office partnership became Sumitomo Goshi in 1921, and in July 1927 the parent ended 236 years of direct family operation by incorporating the mine as Sumitomo Besshi Mining. A 1937 merger with Sumitomo’s coal arm produced Sumitomo Mining; the occupation-era break-up renamed it Kikka Mining in 1946, and in 1947 it bought out the group’s metal mines — the Konomai gold mine chief among them — and the Kunitomi smelter as the zaibatsu holding company was dissolved.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1950From miner to smelter

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY1971 · unconsolidated
Revenue$300M
Net income$5M
Net margin1.8%
FY1972 · unconsolidated
Revenue$331M
Net income$2M
Net margin0.6%
  1. 1950Metals division split off as Besshi Mining; listed
  2. 1952Renamed Sumitomo Metal Mining
  3. 1956Hyuga Smelting founded — nickel
  4. 1962Domestic mine closures begin
  5. 1967Ome plant — entry into electronic materials
  6. 1971Toyo smelter completed

The independent company dates from 1950, when the metals division was split out as Besshi Mining and listed; it took the name Sumitomo Metal Mining in 1952, fixing its place in the postwar Sumitomo group as the non-ferrous house. The next two decades were spent building capacity downstream of the ore: a nickel-smelting subsidiary at Hyuga in 1956, a central research laboratory in 1965, the Ome plant in 1967 that carried it into electronic materials, a new Niihama nickel works in 1970, and the Toyo smelter in 1971.

The reason for building downstream was that the upstream was closing. From 1962 the domestic mines went one after another, squeezed between falling ore grades and, later, a rising yen — an ore body that cannot be relocated has no answer to either. The company’s response was not to defend the mines but to redefine what it was: buy ore on the world market, and make the margin in Japan through smelting and processing. That was a change of self-definition as much as of assets, from a resource company to a materials company, and it set the shape of everything that came after.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1973After Besshi: Hishikari, and going abroad

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY1973 · unconsolidated
Revenue$390M
Net income$4M
Net margin1.1%
FY2010 · consolidated
Revenue$8.3B
Net income$614M
Net margin7.4%
  1. 1973Besshi closes after 282 years
  2. 1980State drilling at Hishikari — 18 of 18 holes hit gold
  3. 1985Hishikari in production — ~6 t of gold a year
  4. 1986Stake in the Morenci copper mine (US)
  5. 1988Stake in PT International Nickel Indonesia
  6. 2009Stake in Nickel Asia (Philippines); Pogo from 2006

In March 1973 Besshi closed, 282 years after the first licence. The company that the 1927 incorporation had created went on without the mine that had created it, its centre of gravity now in imported feed and domestic smelting. But the mining identity survived, and it survived because of a claim almost nobody had wanted. In 1969 the company had picked up the Hishikari block in Kagoshima for $27,778 (¥10m) — the board was lukewarm, and the push came from engineers whose morale was being ground down by a decade of closures.

Nothing much happened for a decade. Then the state Metal Mining Agency drilled it from 1980 and all eighteen holes hit gold. Production started in July 1985 at roughly six tonnes of gold a year against some 250 tonnes of estimated reserves, making Hishikari the only commercially producing gold mine in Japan — and, at grades that had no domestic peer, a durable earner whose cash the company put into research for its diversifying businesses. President Fujisaki Akira had told the company for years never to let the Kyushu block go. It was also where the mine engineers were trained who would later be sent to run operations overseas.

That was the point at which buying equity in other people’s ore became strategy rather than opportunism: a stake in the Morenci copper mine in the United States in 1986, shares in PT International Nickel Indonesia in 1988, production at Pogo in Alaska from 2006, and a stake in the Philippines’ Nickel Asia in 2009. Each one spread the resource base across more geographies and cut the dependence on any single jurisdiction — the portfolio answer to the problem that had killed the domestic mines.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2011Sierra Gorda, and the battery years

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2011 · consolidated
Revenue$10.8B
Net income$1.1B
Net margin9.7%
FY2025 · consolidated
Revenue$10.6B
Net income$110M
Net margin1%
  1. 2011Sierra Gorda acquired with Sumitomo Corporation
  2. 2015Production starts a year late, into the copper price crash
  3. 2016Equity-method loss of $633.4M (¥69bn); net loss the following year
  4. 2021Sierra Gorda sold to South32
  5. 2022Medium-term plan — cathode materials plus three resource projects
  6. 2023Quebrada Blanca opens; Côté in commercial production from 2024

In 2011, with Sumitomo Corporation, the company took a share of Sierra Gorda in Chile — about US$2.9 billion to raise a mine with 1.3 billion tonnes of recoverable ore out of bare ground. Metal prices were high and the visible risk was the opposite one: a smelting business with no equity in ore of its own slowly running out of feed. What was misjudged was not the price outlook but the difficulty of the build. Start-up slipped a year to July 2015, straight into the copper price collapse, and operations were unstable from the beginning. Two impairments followed — equity-method losses of $633.4M (¥69bn) and ¥79.9 billion, together over ¥140 billion — and the year ended March 2017 closed at a net loss.

The stake went to Australia’s South32 in 2021 for a gain of $677.5M (¥74bn) — barely half of what the mine had cost in write-downs. The target it had been bought to serve, 300,000 tonnes of equity copper, was not lowered; the money and the crews were moved to Quebrada Blanca instead. The lesson taken was about timing and screening rather than direction: sensitivity to price and currency, and the discipline of when to break ground, became explicit parts of how a multi-hundred-billion-yen project is approved.

The medium-term plan published in February 2022 set the current shape — expand nickel-based cathode materials for electric vehicles while pushing three resource projects in parallel: Pomalaa in Indonesia, Quebrada Blanca in Chile, and Côté in Canada. Quebrada Blanca opened in October 2023 and Côté reached commercial production in August 2024; the Côté stake of roughly 30 per cent had been bought in 2017 for $191.7M (¥22bn), shelved when gold was weak, then restarted when the price recovered in 2020, with loans to the operating subsidiary reaching $877.9M (¥133bn) by March 2024. Nickel smelting, feed from the Philippines and Indonesia, and cathode manufacture now form a single vertical chain — the same move as 1962, made once more: refuse to be only a miner, and earn the margin further down.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1927

Splitting Besshi and the Shisakajima smelter out of the family’s direct operation (1927)

From what a house holds to what an account holds

To call the end of 236 years of direct operation merely a step in modernization is not enough. Sumitomo’s 1882 house code recorded Besshi as an “imperishable capital asset,” and until around the Sino-Japanese War the house’s business was almost nothing but Besshi. In 1927 Sumitomo Goshi took that same Besshi out of its own direct hands and turned it into the assets of a single company, priced at ¥15 million of capital. The core of the decision lies exactly there: what had been held in the name of the house was moved into the name and the accounts of a corporation.

Incorporation did not, however, make Besshi stronger. Domestic copper output had fallen to 54,000 tonnes by 1922, and the number of working mines had halved by 1929. The smoke-damage compensation ran on until the neutralization plant was completed in 1939, and the new company took over the business with that liability attached. Besshi was exhausted in 1973; what remained was the company. The business ends and the corporation continues — that order of precedence is what Sumitomo Goshi chose in 1927.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2011

Buying into Chile’s Sierra Gorda, and selling out after two write-downs (2011)

The appraisal that comes ten years later

The month after the second impairment was booked, President Nakazato Yoshiaki said that whether this had been a good purchase would be judged ten years on. In 2011, when the company joined the project, metal prices were still climbing and the immediate worry was the slow decline of a smelting business that owned no ore of its own. What was misread was not the market but the estimate of difficulty — roughly US$2.9 billion to raise, from bare ground, a mine with 1.3 billion tonnes of recoverable ore. Production began in July 2015, a year behind plan, and operations were unsteady from the start.

The two write-downs, equity-method investment losses of ¥68,941 million and ¥79,926 million, came to more than ¥140 billion and pulled the company into two consecutive years of red ink. The ¥74,374 million gain realized on the sale ten years later does not reach half of that. Even so, the target of 300,000 tonnes of equity copper was not withdrawn, and the money and the people were moved to Quebrada Blanca in Chile. The ten-year appraisal Nakazato spoke of has been carried over to the next mine.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— Sumitomo Metal Mining full history in Japanese →

  1. Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports) and earnings materials.
  2. Corporate Histories: A Century of Meiji『企業の歴史 : 明治百年』, “Sumitomo Metal Mining” (Keizai Shunjusha, 1968).

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer


Data API

Sumitomo Metal Mining’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/5713/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/5713/history.json History overview
GET /api/5713/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/5713/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/5713/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/5713/executives.json Executives
GET /api/5713/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/5713/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/5713/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/5713/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/5713/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/5713/workforce.json Workforce