Sojitz — Company History

Financial history 1971–2026 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
2003
Head office
Tokyo, Japan
Listed
2003
Founder
Nichimen + Nissho Iwai
Revenue · FYE Mar 2026
$17.4B (¥2.76tn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2026
$655M (¥104bn)
Sojitz: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

2003A merger the bank arranged

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2003 · consolidated
Revenue$24.8B
Net income-$457M
Net margin-1.8%
FY2004 · consolidated
Revenue$54.2B
Net income-$69M
Net margin-0.1%
  1. 2003Nichimen and Nissho Iwai combine under a joint holding company
  2. 2003$2.3B (¥266bn) of preferred shares issued to six banks and Lehman Brothers
  3. 2004The two operating companies merge as Sojitz Corporation
  4. 2004New plan: ~¥250 billion of loss processing; aircraft finance under review

Sojitz began as an arrangement between creditors. In April 2003 two mid-sized trading houses, Nichimen and Nissho Iwai, transferred their shares into a joint holding company and listed it in Tokyo and Osaka. What pushed them together was not overlapping business but the predicament of UFJ Bank, main lender to both: every over-indebted second-tier trading house in Japan sat on UFJ’s books, and with a Financial Services Agency special inspection approaching, the bank needed its problem borrowers restructured without the provisioning that a failure would have forced. When the plan was announced in December 2002, the share-exchange ratio, the holding company’s name and its leadership were all still blank.

The size of the rescue was set by what the lenders could be asked for rather than by what the businesses needed. A ¥200 billion capital increase was billed as the cushion for cutting ¥80 billion of costs, 4,000 staff and 130 subsidiaries; pressed at the press conference on where the figure came from, neither president gave an answer. In May 2003 the holding company issued $2.3B (¥266bn) of preferred shares to six banks and to Lehman Brothers — against a common-equity market capitalisation of roughly ¥50 billion. Crucially it was new money rather than a debt-for-equity swap, which meant no lender would countenance writing down the same assets a year later.

The two operating companies merged in April 2004 to form Sojitz Corporation. Within weeks UFJ downgraded its own classification of the borrower, rumours of a state-backed turnaround body circulated, and the share price fell from the ¥600s to ¥336. On 23 July 2004 president Nishimura Hidetoshi announced a plan to absorb some ¥250 billion of losses — calling the number, in his own words, an “estimate” — and put even aircraft finance, the old Nissho Iwai’s point of pride, on the list of candidates for withdrawal.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2005The ¥616 billion preferred-share overhang

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2005 · consolidated
Revenue$42.5B
Net income-$3.7B
Net margin-8.8%
FY2011 · consolidated
Revenue$50.3B
Net income$199M
Net margin0.4%
  1. 2005Net loss of ¥412.4 billion; preferred shares reach ¥616 billion
  2. 2005Holding company and operating company merged into one
  3. 2007Kase Yutaka becomes president; the “3A” push
  4. 2010Post-crisis trough: operating profit down 69%

The deferred losses arrived at once. In the year ended March 2005 Sojitz booked ¥453.4 billion of extraordinary losses and a net loss of ¥412.4 billion, after UFJ’s absorption into Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi forced another round of write-downs. To avoid running short of equity the company issued a further ¥360 billion of preferred shares in October 2004, taking the outstanding balance to ¥616 billion — in substance a debt-for-equity swap. Because each tranche converts into common stock as it matures, Sojitz carried the resulting dilution overhang all the way to 2024.

The rebuilding fell to Dobashi Akio, an unusual head for a Japanese trading house: a property-development specialist from the old Nichimen who had never served abroad. He led some 17,000 employees at a company that had already taken two rounds of financial support, and said plainly that he never felt at ease. The targets — ¥75 billion of recurring profit and net debt at about three times equity — were met a year early, but buying back preferred shares consumed the cash flow that would otherwise have funded investment.

Under Kase Yutaka, president from April 2007, Sojitz pushed into what it called the 3A regions — Asia, Africa and Arabia — and coal and metal prices lifted net profit to ¥62.7 billion in the year to March 2008. The 2008 financial crisis ended that: by the year to March 2010 operating profit had fallen 69% to ¥16.1 billion and net profit to ¥8.8 billion. The ¥101 billion of recurring profit promised at the time of the merger remained out of reach seven years on.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2012Shrinking to safety

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2012 · consolidated
Revenue$56.3B
Net income-$45M
Net margin-0.1%
FY2015 · consolidated
Revenue$15.0B
Net income$273M
Net margin1.8%
  1. 2012First net loss as a merged company; Sato Yoji becomes president
  2. 2014Tenth year: debt reduction and organisational merging complete
  3. 2015Mid-term plan doubles the investment frame to ¥300 billion

A second loss followed. Sojitz reported a net loss of ¥3.6 billion for the year to March 2012 — its first as a merged company — and Sato Yoji, a finance man from the old Nissho Iwai, took over as president. He sold every asset the market worried about, moved the head office to Uchisaiwaicho in Tokyo, and returned the company to profit the following year. By the tenth year, to March 2014, net profit was ¥27.2 billion and both the debt reduction and the merging of the two organisations had run their course.

The numbers showed what the retreat had bought. Interest-bearing debt fell to ¥922.7 billion by March 2016 and equity rose to ¥520.4 billion — roughly half the debt Sojitz had carried a decade earlier. Sato said the company had lost the market’s confidence entirely in 2005 and had since secured its financial footing. Even so, Toyota Tsusho earned ¥67.5 billion in the same year against Sojitz’s ¥33.0 billion, and the gap to the five resource-rich majors stayed an order of magnitude wide.

The retreat had a cost that never appeared on the balance sheet. Steel products had been spun into Metal One and LNG into LNG Japan; resources fell from six or seven tenths of investment to two or three. Sato was blunt about what went with them: able people had left through the restructurings, and with those businesses gone the company’s own capacity to build good assets had weakened. Good people, in his view, are what make good assets accumulate — so the disposals lightened the balance sheet by thinning the bench that would have to invest next.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2016“Sojitz-ness”: earning beyond the cycle

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2016 · consolidated
Revenue$15.2B
Net income$335M
Net margin2.2%
FY2026 · consolidated
Revenue$17.4B
Net income$655M
Net margin3.8%
  1. 2017Fujimoto Masayoshi becomes president; the “Sojitz-ness” strategy
  2. 2022Moves to the TSE Prime market
  3. 2023Record net profit of ¥111.2 billion; DaiTanViet acquired in Vietnam
  4. 2024Uemura Kosuke becomes president; Mid-Term Plan 2026
  5. 202515 million shares cancelled; non-resource earnings above ¥80 billion

Fujimoto Masayoshi, president from June 2017, declined to fight the big five head-on and steered investment toward non-resource businesses where function mattered more than scale. He called the principle “Sojitz-ness” — there being no point, as he put it, in doing what everyone else does. Sojitz was early among trading houses to allow outside work, back internal start-ups and adopt job-based employment, and in February 2016 it had bought half of a Singapore used-aircraft dealer, the first sizeable move in a decade by the aircraft division that had once been its flagship.

The non-resource base compounded: food and retail in Vietnam, energy-saving services, fisheries, and in November 2023 the outright purchase of DaiTanViet, Vietnam’s largest food-service wholesaler. Net profit climbed from ¥56.8 billion in the year to March 2018 to ¥111.2 billion in the year to March 2023, the highest since the company was formed, helped by a commodity upswing. In April 2022 Sojitz moved to the Tokyo exchange’s Prime market.

Uemura Kosuke, president from April 2024, describes the next step as gathering scattered businesses from lines into surfaces and then into clusters. His mid-term plan targets an average net profit above ¥120 billion and ¥600 billion of growth investment — half in existing businesses, half in digital — and, by 2030, a doubling of corporate value to ¥200 billion of profit and a ¥2 trillion market capitalisation. He is candid about the gap: all five majors trade above one times book while Sojitz does not, and its price-earnings ratio has to move from around eight to the high nines before that changes. Revenue in the year to March 2026 was ¥2.76 trillion against ¥4.68 trillion just after the merger — a smaller company, and a steadier one.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

The turning points, read in full: what was at stake, what was chosen and what the revenue did around it. The complete sourced record of each — background, options weighed, outcome — is in the Japanese edition, linked under every decision.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2003

Key decision · 2003

The share transfer that created Sojitz, and ¥266 billion of preferred shares (2003)

What actually set the size of the merger

The ¥200 billion was never explained, but the arithmetic can be reconstructed after the fact. If the ¥80 billion of cost cuts meant shedding 4,000 staff and 130 subsidiaries, then severance premiums and disposal losses would have added up to a figure the companies could have shown. What the banks were actually asked for, however, was allocated by loan exposure — ¥100 billion from UFJ, ¥60 billion from Mizuho Corporate — and by the following spring the issue had swelled to ¥266 billion. The scale of the merger appears to have been set not by the overlap between the two businesses but by the ceiling on what could be collected from the lenders.

That design did, nonetheless, keep Sojitz alive. Precisely because the ¥266 billion was new money rather than a debt-for-equity swap, no lender could accept an impairment of the same assets months after injecting it, and business carried on under the maxim that unrealised losses need never be realised. The price was ¥616 billion of preferred shares converting until 2024, and the cash flow consumed buying them back. The merger the press called a forced marriage kept two firms from failing at the time, and passed two decades of the bill to the managements that followed.

This decision in Japanese — the full sourced dossier →

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2004

Key decision · 2004

Absorbing ¥250 billion of losses and cutting into the aircraft “sanctuary” (2004)

How far can a company pushed by its bank choose its own businesses?

At the centre of this decision is the predicament of a trading house merged at its bank’s convenience and then hurried through the clean-up. The natural order would have been to decide which businesses to keep and which to release, and only then to fix the losses. Sojitz was given the reverse: chased by its rating and its funding, it was forced to announce a plan carrying a headline total while the choice of businesses was still deferred. Nishimura Hidetoshi’s description of the loss figure as an “estimate” captures that inversion.

Cutting into the sanctuary was no simpler. Aircraft was the business that carried the old Nissho Iwai’s sense of itself as a first-rank house; the company split over whether to give up the sales rights, and the detail of the withdrawal missed its promised deadline. Efficiency alone could not bind two organisations of different descent into one rebuilding. Yet it was by passing through that painful entrance that Sojitz repaired its finances over the following decade and began looking for a colour of its own. How far a company founded at a bank’s urging can choose its own businesses is the question it has been answering ever since.

This decision in Japanese — the full sourced dossier →

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2014

Key decision · 2014

A decade spent halving ¥1.5 trillion of debt and fusing two organisations (2014)

What the rebuilding prepared for the decade after

Sojitz’s ten-year rebuilding was not a bold stroke but an accumulation of unglamorous work: paring debt and binding an organisation together. A merger hurried along by a bank compressed the balance sheet and the headcount before anyone had chosen which businesses to be in, and left the rift between the two predecessors as an after-effect. Under those unfavourable terms successive presidents put becoming lighter ahead of growing, and did not change direction even when growth investments turned into impairments. The judgements of a period that resists being told as a story of attack are what later gave Sojitz the strength to talk about a character of its own.

In retrospect this was as much a period of asking how two companies become one as of reducing debt. The organising principle — keep the functional businesses where the majors are not competing — was born of financial necessity and became the ground on which the “Sojitz-ness” differentiation was later built. If a decade of cutting under duress prepared the conditions for the next advance, then rebuilding and strategy were a single continuous thing. How to turn the aftermath of a merger into the next source of strength is a question shared by many companies made out of two.

This decision in Japanese — the full sourced dossier →

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2016

Key decision · 2016

Differentiating on non-resource earnings rather than scale (2016)

Choosing not to chase size

Sojitz’s non-resource differentiation was one answer to how a mid-sized house that cannot match the majors on scale should shield itself from the commodity swings common to all trading companies, and where it should earn instead. “Sojitz-ness”, as Fujimoto Masayoshi first framed it, was a slogan with unclear edges; it acquired substance as non-resource profits accumulated and produced the highest earnings since the company was formed. Stepping out of the race for size and earning through the connections between businesses is a workable answer for a trading house placed below the leaders.

How far the approach carries is still being tested. The goal of raising non-resource profit to a genuine ¥100 billion asks whether the figure stands without the tailwind of commodity prices. The cluster strategy inherited by Uemura Kosuke will be judged on whether scattered businesses really consolidate into blocks with enough weight to face the majors. For a company shaped by the Nichimen–Nissho Iwai merger and a decade of financial repair, whether it can justify itself as a trading house through character rather than size is the question the coming decade will answer.

This decision in Japanese — the full sourced dossier →


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— Sojitz full history in Japanese →

  1. Sojitz Corporation — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports), FY2004–FY2026.
  2. Weekly Toyo Keizai — 週刊東洋経済: 21 Dec 2002 (“the inside story of a forced marriage”); 1 Feb 2003; 15 Feb 2003; 10 Apr 2004; 3 Jul 2004; 7 Aug 2004; 10 Dec 2005 (the preferred-share overhang); 21 Jan 2006; 8 Apr 2016; 10 Aug 2024.
  3. Nikkei Business — 日経ビジネス (Nikkei BP): 2 Aug 2004; 30 Aug 2004.
  4. Nihon Keizai Shimbun — 日本経済新聞, 28 Feb 2017 (Fujimoto named president). nikkei.com.
  5. Sojitz Corporation — 中期経営計画2026 (Mid-Term Management Plan 2026), 1 May 2024. sojitz.com.
  6. Sojitz Corporation — timely disclosure on the cancellation of treasury shares, 22 Aug 2025. sojitz.com.
  7. Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun — 日刊工業新聞, January 2012 (Kase Yutaka on the “3A” regions).
  8. Diamond Online — ダイヤモンド・オンライン, June 2021 (Fujimoto on side jobs, internal start-ups and job-based employment).
  9. Zaikai Online — 財界オンライン, 27 Sep 2024 (Uemura Kosuke on the cluster strategy).
  10. The pre-2003 histories of the two predecessor houses are held separately, under 日商岩井 (Nissho Iwai) and ニチメン (Nichimen). The full Japanese edition of this history is at the-shashi.com/tse/2768/.

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →



Data API

Sojitz’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET. Full specification →

/api/2768/manifest.json ·/api/2768/history.json ·/api/2768/timeline.json ·/api/2768/decisions.json ·/api/2768/executives.json ·/api/2768/shareholders.json ·/api/2768/financials.json ·/api/2768/financials-longterm.json ·/api/2768/segments.json ·/api/2768/regions.json ·/api/2768/workforce.json · /api/2768/decisions/{slug}.json

/api/companies.json ·/api/decisions.json