Point becomes a holding company and consolidates as the multi-brand SPA Adastria (2013)
From a one-brand company to a multi-brand holding company
The heart of this decision lies in rebuilding the organization itself — from a company that was an assemblage of brand-specific specialty chains into one that binds several brands under a single corporate brand. That the holding company raised in 2013 was folded away in 2015, an eighteen-month detour, reflects how far from easy the practical work of integration was. Merchandising and logistics did not mesh simply by separating or combining corporate boxes; the duplication and expense that had increased along the way had to be re-integrated and cut back down. Even so, letting go of Point, the name it had carried since the founding, and raising Adastria in its place marked the turn toward multi-brand management, unbound by the experience of one brand’s success.
The name, derived from a Latin phrase about winning glory by overcoming hardship, anticipated something of what followed. On that foundation Adastria accumulated acquisitions — Velvet in the United States in 2017, Zetton in 2022 — and widened into a multi-company model that stands up a separate company for each business. In 2025 the group renamed itself again, as and ST Holdings, and stepped into a redefinition of itself as a platform operator built around its own e-commerce. From a one-brand company to a multi-brand holding company: the rearrangement carried out between 2013 and 2015 set, early, the prototype of the reorganizations this company keeps repeating.
Revenue and net margin, FY2008–FY2018
Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY2013 onwards — after it was taken.
Source: securities reports
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
and ST Holdings’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/2685/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/2685/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/2685/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/2685/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/2685/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/2685/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/2685/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/2685/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/2685/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/2685/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/2685/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/2685/workforce.json | Workforce |