INPEX

Company history

Financial history 2002–2025 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
1966 (Teikoku Oil, 1941)
Head office
Tokyo, Japan
Listed
2006
Formed by
Merger of Inpex and Teikoku Oil
Revenue · FYE Mar 2025
$13.4B (¥2.01tn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2025
$2.6B (¥394bn)
INPEX: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1941A state oil company, and the ceiling of domestic crude

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1941Teikoku Oil founded by statute — half government, half private
  2. 1942Absorbs the oil-mining divisions of four companies
  3. 1950Statute repealed; refounded as an ordinary company
  4. 1964Cash crisis; natural gas becomes the funding source
  5. 1966Inpex founded as a state-backed overseas explorer

INPEX's older half was created by statute. In September 1941, under the Teikoku Oil Company Act, the government and private industry each put up half of ¥100 million to found Teikoku Oil — a national-policy company built on a small exploration venture set up the year before by Nippon Oil, Nippon Mining and five others. Its purpose was to break Japan's dependence on foreign oil, and it did so by consolidation rather than discovery: in 1942 the oil-mining divisions of four companies were folded in at the government's urging, and wartime mergers through 1945 left Teikoku Oil holding most of the domestic fields. In return for a guaranteed 4% dividend, guaranteed bond payments and ten years' tax exemption, it accepted state supervision of its business. The guarantees ended with the 1946 law restricting government financial aid, and in June 1950, its founding statute repealed, Teikoku Oil re-emerged as an ordinary commercial company.

What it inherited was a business with a hard ceiling. Output bottomed at some 165,000 kilolitres in fiscal 1948, then recovered to a record 353,000 by fiscal 1951 as new pay zones were found at the Yabase field in Akita; Teikoku Oil produced over 97% of Japan's domestic crude and sold nearly all of it to three refiners on the Japan Sea coast. But the price collapsed underneath it — ¥10,091 per kilolitre in 1951 fell to ¥6,615 by 1970, about a third gone in twenty years — while headcount dropped from roughly 6,200 to 2,030 and the payroll rose from ¥1.45 billion to ¥3.48 billion, a 7.3-fold increase per head. Cash ran out in February 1964; a vice-president seconded from Nippon Mining took the presidency, and with banks unwilling, the company financed itself by pushing natural gas at Kubiki in Niigata, whose quick receipts turned over faster than oil.

The other half of the future company began in 1966, when the government set up North Sumatra Offshore Petroleum Development — later Inpex — with the state petroleum corporation taking a majority and public money carrying the exploration risk. Japanese firms had gone abroad only in the 1960s and were outmatched by the majors on negotiating power, concessions, capital and technology alike: of more than sixty producing overseas projects with Japanese participation, fewer than ten were operated by a Japanese company, and Inpex's own operatorships came to two small blocks in Egypt and Venezuela. Teikoku Oil's ventures fared no better — three wells drilled off Tawau in Sabah in 1970 found oil-bearing beds but nothing commercial. Exploration was assumed to fail: roughly eight in ten test wells came up dry, and ¥1.6–1.7 billion was written off every year as a matter of course.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1972Overseas reserves, and a block of its own

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2002 · consolidated
Revenue$1.5B
Net income$220M
Net margin15%
FY2005 · consolidated
Revenue$4.3B
Net income$694M
Net margin16%
  1. 1986Begins exploring Australia's North West Shelf
  2. 1998Acquires WA-285-P outright at 100%
  3. 2002The Ichthys gas-condensate field is named
  4. 2004Inpex lists; signs the Azadegan contract with Iran
  5. 2005Merger with Teikoku Oil announced

Inpex built its position in Indonesia, and mostly as a passenger. By 2005 it held nineteen blocks — ten in Indonesia, nine in Australia — but the important ones were minority participations in ventures run by others: 50% of the Mahakam offshore and Attaka fields alongside Total and Unocal, 35% of South Natuna Sea B, 16.3% of Tangguh. The state petroleum corporation that funded it had spread its money across refiners, explorers and trading houses and dissipated its resources in the process; Inpex was one of its few clear successes, and after the corporation was wound up the government treated Inpex and Teikoku Oil as the two flagships of Japanese upstream. Inpex listed its shares in 2004 as part of that disposal, with the state retaining 29%. One asset stood apart from the pattern: the Masela block in eastern Indonesia, held 100%, which would later become Abadi.

Becoming an operator rather than an investor was a deliberate, expensive project. Inpex spent heavily on three Indonesian blocks in the 1980s and found nothing worth developing, then widened its search to Australia's North West Shelf from 1986. In 1998 it took WA-285-P — 600 square kilometres off Western Australia — outright, at 100%. Drilling from 2000 confirmed gas, and three rounds of exploration over eight years mapped the field, named Ichthys in 2002: about 13 trillion cubic feet of gas and more than 500 million barrels of condensate, roughly 1.2 billion barrels of oil equivalent. On its own it would multiply the company's equity production 1.7-fold. It was also unaffordable and beyond its competence — liquefaction alone would cost at least ¥600 billion, LNG needed long-term buyers signed before a spade went in the ground, and the work ran from offshore processing and a floating storage vessel to a subsea pipeline and an onshore plant.

Meanwhile the state pushed Inpex toward a different prize. After Prime Minister Mori's 2000 meeting with President Khatami, Japan won priority negotiating rights over Iran's Azadegan field — an estimated 26 billion barrels, in the class of Saudi Arabia's Ghawar — and the trade ministry, having just lost the Khafji concession, pressed hard. Inpex signed in February 2004 for about $2 billion with Japan carrying 75%. The terms were thin: a buyback contract under which the crude stayed Iranian and Japan recovered costs plus a set margin over six and a half years, on heavy oil, in old Iran–Iraq war minefields, on a project Shell had already walked away from. On 5 November 2005, Inpex and Teikoku Oil announced they would combine under a joint holding company — 1.805 billion barrels of proved reserves between them, more than Unocal — despite a market-capitalisation gap of more than four to one.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2006The holding company, and a $34 billion bet

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2006 · consolidated
Revenue$6.1B
Net income$889M
Net margin14.7%
FY2018 · consolidated
Revenue$8.5B
Net income$365M
Net margin4.3%
  1. 2006Inpex Holdings lists; the trade minister holds a golden share
  2. 2008Subsidiaries merged in; renamed Inpex Corporation
  3. 2010Raises about $5.9B (¥520bn) in new equity
  4. 2012FID on Ichthys LNG — $34 billion
  5. 2015Wins 5% of Abu Dhabi's ADCO for forty years
  6. 2018Ichthys LNG begins production

Inpex Holdings was created by joint share transfer in April 2006 with ¥30 billion of capital and listed on the first section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange. The trade minister took a single golden share carrying a veto, and the state still held about 19% of the equity a decade later; the chairman and president both came from the old MITI. In its first year the group turned over ¥969.7 billion with ordinary profit of ¥586.3 billion — no comparable Japanese upstream company existed. The arithmetic of the merger was contested: Nippon Oil, Teikoku's largest shareholder, called the exchange ratio unfair, bought its stake above 20%, and said publicly that Inpex looked overvalued. In October 2008 the holding company absorbed both subsidiaries and took the name Inpex Corporation. By then Azadegan was gone — US pressure over Iran's nuclear programme led Inpex to cut its 75% interest to 10% in October 2006, and the Japanese government quietly withdrew its financing and guarantees. The 260,000 barrels a day it was to have supplied, some 6% of Japan's crude imports, never arrived.

Everything then went into Ichthys, and the company bought in what it lacked. It sold 24% of the field to Total in 2006 for its LNG experience, took in around twenty of its senior engineers, and staffed a 300-person Perth office with Australian, European and American hands, designing every facility around proven technology to avoid surprises. The money was raised in layers: about $5.9B (¥520bn) of new equity in August 2010, $20 billion of project finance in August 2012, and retained earnings — because operating cash flow of some ¥200 billion a year could not cover ¥300 billion of annual investment. In December 2012 the board took final investment decision on a $34 billion project, more than the company's entire equity. Interest-bearing debt went from ¥273.1 billion in the year to March 2011 to ¥1,141.2 billion by March 2019.

The build was worse than planned. Up to 30,000 workers were on site as Australia's resource boom drained the labour market, wet-season rain caught the pipework, and start-up slipped about eighteen months past its end-2016 target while costs swelled by nearly ¥700 billion to $40 billion — just as oil fell from $100 a barrel to under $50, in a business where every dollar of average price was worth ¥2.5 billion of consolidated profit. Group revenue shrank 24% in two years and net profit fell from ¥183.6 billion to ¥16.7 billion. In the middle of that, in April 2015, Inpex secured 5% of Abu Dhabi's onshore ADCO concession for forty years, 2015 to 2054 — an unusual term, won after Total took its 10% and Japan, China and Korea fought over the remainder, settled by a call between Prime Minister Abe and the crown prince. Ichthys finally started up in July 2018, twenty years after the block was acquired: 8.9 million tonnes of LNG a year, roughly 70% contracted to Japanese buyers for two decades, and membership of the ten-odd companies worldwide able to operate a project of that size.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2019One leg, and the capital to grow another

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2019 · consolidated
Revenue$8.9B
Net income$882M
Net margin9.9%
FY2025 · consolidated
Revenue$13.4B
Net income$2.6B
Net margin19.6%
  1. 2020First net loss since the merger — $1.0B (¥112bn)
  2. 2021Renamed INPEX Corporation
  3. 2022INPEX Vision @2022 — net zero by 2050
  4. 2023Shell exits Abadi; INPEX holds 65%
  5. 2025INPEX Vision 2035; progressive dividend adopted

The structural weakness showed up the moment prices broke. In the year to December 2020 the group posted a net loss of $1.0B (¥112bn) — its first since the merger — on an average price of about $43 a barrel, after ¥189.9 billion of impairments including the Prelude floating LNG project; revenue fell 23% to ¥771.0 billion. In April 2021 the company renamed itself INPEX, and president Ueda Takayuki accepted the criticism directly: this was, he agreed, an Ichthys one-legged business, and an accident at that one plant would show up in the profit line. The answer he set out was to use the cash from oil and gas to build something else — blue hydrogen from the Minami-Nagaoka gas field with the CO₂ injected into another field nearby, and ammonia made from Abu Dhabi gas and shipped to Japan.

The upcycle that followed gave him the means. Revenue reached ¥2,316.1 billion in the year to December 2022 with ¥461.1 billion of profit, both records, as Middle East and Africa revenue doubled. Shareholder returns rose 4.6-fold in two years to ¥201.6 billion, with buybacks becoming an annual fixture. But foreign investors — about 30% of the register, down from over 45% in 2018 — pressed for more, and INPEX answered with a discipline unusual for a Japanese resource company: ROIC measured against a roughly 6% cost of capital rather than ROE, a progressive dividend adopted in February 2025 that will not fall with the oil price, and a 2025–27 plan promising over ¥400 billion of returns alongside ¥1.8 trillion of investment.

The second leg is still being built. Abadi, the wholly-owned Masela field, was derailed in 2016 when Indonesia rejected floating liquefaction and demanded an onshore plant for the jobs it would bring to the country's east; replanned at 9.5 million tonnes a year and some ¥3 trillion, it lost Shell's 35% in 2023 to Pertamina and Petronas, leaving INPEX with 65%, carbon capture designed in from the start, and first production around 2030. The 2022 long-term vision committed the company to net zero by 2050 with gas as the transition fuel and CCS, hydrogen and renewables beside it; INPEX Vision 2035, published in February 2025, put ¥1.8 trillion of growth investment behind five business areas and targeted ROE above 10%. Overseas assets now generate roughly nine-tenths of segment revenue — the international company the state set out to build in 1966, still looking for the thing that comes after oil.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2005

Merging Inpex and Teikoku Oil under a joint holding company (2005)

Where the logic of the state and the logic of the market overlapped

What this merger poses is the question of how far private management judgement and national policy can be made to coincide in a field — resource development — that touches national security. Combining with a Teikoku Oil that was plainly the weaker party was not, by the logic of the market alone, obviously advantageous to Inpex; it acquired its rationality only when placed in the policy context of a "rising-sun oil company," a notion framed against the failures of the old petroleum public corporation.

That said, a half-public, half-private governance structure carrying a golden share held by the trade minister meant not only the benefit of credit support in raising money but also a permanent constraint on decision-making of a kind no purely private company faces. That the company could take final investment decision on Ichthys seven years later was possible only because of the scale and bargaining power the merger produced — but the problem of how to hold the distance between national policy and corporate management was written into this company from the day it was formed, and remains.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2012

Final investment decision on Ichthys LNG — $34 billion (2012)

What it meant to bet on going it alone

This decision can be read as a wager: an attempt to acquire, with its own money and its own negotiating power, the standing of an "operator" — the position that producing-country governments take seriously. Fourteen years from the sole acquisition of the block in 1998, ten from the discovery of Ichthys, all of the exploration, technology and financing accumulated in between was concentrated into a single number, $34 billion. Behind the willingness to commit more than its own equity lay an urgent recognition, proper to a resource company, that so long as it remained a mere participant in other people's ventures it would accumulate neither a track record nor bargaining power.

What followed also showed that the rightness of such a decision is not proved by completing the construction. Even after schedule slippage and cost overruns brought the plant into operation, earnings swung with the level of the oil price, and trust as an operator is built only by accumulating years of stable supply. An investment that began from the limits of going it alone and was carried through by merger, equity issuance and project finance in turn suggests that, for a resource company, building a track record acquires meaning not through one decision but only through a long sequence of execution.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2015

Securing the Abu Dhabi ADCO concession on an unusual forty-year contract (2015)

A long concession produced by half a century of presence

The heart of this decision lies not in one-off bidding tactics but in the fact that it moved only when an operating record built up since the 1970s combined with the government's resource diplomacy. That Japan obtained the allocation ranking behind Total appears to owe to years of trust on the ground that China and Korea did not have; the unusual forty-year term is legible as the product of accumulation rather than of a single act of negotiating strength. It was a case in which the government's target of raising the share of self-developed resources and a company's pursuit of a concession pointed the same way.

That said, a concession running forty years is exposed for exactly that long to commodity price swings and geopolitical risk. The ownership of the ADCO blocks has continued to shift since, with Chinese companies entering, and if the policies of the producing state or the international situation change, the standing of the interest can shift with them. What a long contract won on half a century of operating experience will mean over the next half century still depends on where resource prices and international relations go.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— INPEX full history in Japanese →

  1. INPEX Corporation and Teikoku Oil — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports).
  2. Eighty Years of Companies and Banks『会社銀行八十年史』, 1955. NDL Digital Collections.
  3. Securities Analysts Journal証券アナリストジャーナル, vol. 9 no. 3, 1971: "Teikoku Oil today and tomorrow." NDL Digital Collections.
  4. Shukan Toyo Keizai — 週刊東洋経済 (Toyo Keizai Inc.): 24 Feb 2001; 6 Mar 2004; 1 Mar 2011; 30 Jan 2015; 8 May 2015; 4 Aug 2018; 19 Jan 2019; 15 May 2021; 14 Oct 2023.
  5. INPEX Corporation — INPEX Vision @2022 (2022) and INPEX Vision 2035 (February 2025).

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer


Data API

INPEX’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/1605/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/1605/history.json History overview
GET /api/1605/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/1605/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/1605/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/1605/executives.json Executives
GET /api/1605/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/1605/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/1605/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/1605/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/1605/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/1605/workforce.json Workforce