Open Up Group

Company history

Financial history 2007–2025 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
1997
Head office
Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
Listed
2007
Founder
Sanei Shoji (corporate founder)
Revenue · FYE Mar 2025
$1.3B (¥188bn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2025
$84.2M (¥13bn)
Open Up Group: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1976Two lineages, both built by swapping contents

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1976Sato Architectural Design Office — the Yumeshin lineage begins
  2. 1997Kyosei Sangyo founded as a disability-employment subsidiary
  3. 2003Yumeshin lists on the Hercules market
  4. 2004Amuse Capital acquires the shell; staffing licence filed
  5. 2005Trust Tech acquired — engineer dispatch becomes the core business

The legal entity that is now Open Up Group was created in August 1997 in Sagamihara, Kanagawa, by the trading house Sanei Shoji, as a special-purpose subsidiary under Japan’s disabled-persons employment law — a vehicle for meeting a statutory hiring quota, not a business with intentions of its own. Precisely because it held nothing, it could be filled with anything. In November 2004 the investment fund Amuse Capital bought all of its shares, looking for an operating business to load onto a listable shell; in June 2005 it acquired Trust Tech, an engineer-dispatch firm, and the shell became a technical staffing company. In 2008 Trust Tech was absorbed and its name taken as the parent’s own. The entity was continuous; the business was not.

The other lineage began in 1976 as Sato Architectural Design Office, incorporated in 1990 as Yumeshin. Its business was dispatching construction site-management engineers to general contractors — demand that grew through the late 1990s as contractors held down permanent hiring. Yumeshin listed on the Osaka exchange’s Hercules market in 2003, moved to a pure holding structure in 2005, and from then on expanded by acquiring subsidiaries and then merging, splitting and renaming them in a near-continuous cycle.

By 2005 the two lineages that would later become one company had converged on the same method without knowing it: keep the corporate shell, change what is inside it, and reorganize subsidiaries as freely as departments. That shared instinct is what made the 2021 combination possible, and it explains most of what the group has done since.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2006Growth by acquisition, and the bill for it

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2007 · unconsolidated
Revenue$77M
Net income$3M
Net margin3.3%
FY2020 · consolidated
Revenue$766M
Net income$12M
Net margin1.6%
  1. 2007Trust Tech lists on JASDAQ
  2. 2013Moves to the Tokyo Stock Exchange First Section
  3. 2016MTrec (UK) acquired; overseas expansion begins
  4. 2017British staffing group acquired; Europe scaled up
  5. 2019Entry into construction dispatch by acquisition
  6. 2020Renamed BeNEXT Group; ¥29.4bn construction impairment

Trust Tech listed on JASDAQ in June 2007 — two years after becoming an engineer-dispatch company — and climbed the market tiers to the Tokyo Stock Exchange First Section by December 2013. Revenue moved from ¥15.5bn in FY11 to ¥30.1bn in FY15, then accelerated as acquisitions came in sequence: staffing and engineering firms at home, MTrec in Britain in 2016, an Indonesian arm, the IT-dispatch firm Fusion Eye in 2017. FY16 revenue reached ¥43.0bn, 1.4 times the prior year.

In December 2017 the company bought a British staffing group, followed by Quattro in 2018 and a Vietnamese business in 2019 — but the overseas segment grew in size without growing in profit: ¥22.0bn of revenue and an operating loss in FY17, ¥31.2bn and ¥0.2bn of operating profit in FY18. Meanwhile the domestic technical segment produced ¥40.4bn and ¥5.0bn in FY18 and carried the group. The gap between areas where scale converted into earnings and areas where it did not was already visible.

In January 2020 Trust Tech renamed itself BeNEXT Group and moved to a holding structure, unifying subsidiary names under one brand. It had entered construction dispatch in November 2019 by acquisition — and in FY20 that segment produced ¥8.7bn of revenue, a ¥28.3bn operating loss and a ¥29.4bn impairment, turning a group that had earned ¥4.7bn the year before into a ¥25.2bn operating loss. The goodwill had been priced on demand and margins that the business did not deliver. Buying one business area after another had outrun the group’s ability to verify what it was buying.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2021Merging with Yumeshin — paid in shares

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2021 · consolidated
Revenue$866M
Net income$24M
Net margin2.7%
FY2022 · consolidated
Revenue$1.2B
Net income$29M
Net margin2.4%
  1. 2021Yumeshin Holdings absorbed in an all-share merger
  2. 2021Construction segment returns to profit
  3. 2022Moves to the TSE Prime Market

In April 2021 BeNEXT Group absorbed Yumeshin Holdings, paying entirely in stock, and renamed itself Yumeshin BeNEXT Group. The combination created a roughly ¥200bn technical staffing group, third or fourth in its industry, with four segments: machinery/electrical and IT, overseas, manufacturing, and construction. The logic was direct — BeNEXT had entered construction on its own and written off ¥29.4bn for the attempt, and Yumeshin brought the real demand base and scale that would fix it.

It largely worked. FY21 revenue reached ¥156.6bn, 1.6 times the prior year; construction went from ¥8.7bn of revenue and a ¥28.3bn loss to ¥36.9bn and ¥5.3bn of profit. The technical segment held its place as the earnings pillar at ¥70.7bn and ¥7.1bn. Overseas remained the exception, with a small operating loss and another impairment.

Leadership split between the two sides: Nishida Yutaka, who had come from Recruit Staffing to run BeNEXT in 2018, as chairman and CEO; Sato Hiroteru, a relative of Yumeshin’s founder, as president and COO. The company moved to the Prime Market in April 2022 in the exchange’s reclassification.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2023Open Up Group: out of Europe, into two domestic pillars

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2023 · consolidated
Revenue$1.1B
Net income$68M
Net margin6.3%
FY2025 · consolidated
Revenue$1.3B
Net income$84M
Net margin6.7%
  1. 2023Renamed Open Up Group; both predecessor names retired
  2. 2024Segment swap with UT Group — one subsidiary sold, two bought
  3. 2025European business sold; full exit from Europe
  4. 2025Record year: revenue ¥188.0bn, net profit ¥12.6bn
  5. 2025Nishida Yutaka takes chairman, president and CEO

In January 2023, less than two years after the merger, the company dropped both predecessor names and became Open Up Group. What followed was an unusually concentrated round of internal reorganization — splits, absorptions and renamings that ended with one operating company per business area: construction dispatch, machinery and electrical dispatch, IT dispatch, IT contracting, and disability employment. In April 2024 the swapping extended to whole segments: a subsidiary was sold to UT Group while two of UT Group’s companies were bought, both parties being listed staffing firms.

In March 2025 the group sold its entire European holding, exiting seven years after entering. Overseas revenue had grown but never earned properly — ¥27.7bn of revenue for ¥0.9bn of operating profit in FY24 — and the segment’s headcount fell 99% with the sale. What remained was domestic: FY24 revenue of ¥188.0bn, operating profit ¥16.2bn and net profit ¥12.6bn, a record, with machinery/electrical and IT at ¥101.5bn — 54% of revenue and 68% of operating profit — and construction at ¥56.9bn, lifted by the site-manager shortage created by the 2024 overtime rules.

In July 2025 Sato Hiroteru stepped back to a board seat and Nishida took chairman, president and CEO together, completing the shift away from founding-family involvement. The medium-term plan for the year to June 2026 keeps the two domestic pillars and narrows overseas to Southeast Asia and foreign engineers placed in Japan. Twenty-eight years after a quota-compliance subsidiary was registered in Sagamihara, the group has arrived at its current shape by repeatedly buying and selling the businesses inside it — and there is no sign the method is finished.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2005

Buying Trust Tech into a disability-employment shell (2005)

How the name that was bought became the name of the company

The June 2005 acquisition is hard to picture if read as an ordinary corporate purchase. Seller and buyer were under the control of the same investment fund, and the target company had been established only eight months before the deal. The substance of the transaction was closer to a choice of arrangement — which business to load onto an entity aiming at a listing. Onto a company created for disability employment, put manufacturing contracting; then put engineer dispatch on top of that; then take off the businesses that do not fit. That sequence is packed into less than a year, from November 2004 to September 2005.

What resulted was a company in which the continuity of the legal entity and the continuity of the business do not match. The registered incorporation is Sagamihara, August 1997; the substantive original business is Trust Tech, established in September 2004; the corporate name moved in 2008 from the buyer to the bought, then to BeNEXT in 2020 and to Open Up in 2023. An entity placed in 1997 to satisfy a statutory employment quota now operates as a TSE Prime-listed company posting ¥187.9bn of revenue in the year to June 2025.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2013

From JASDAQ to the First Section, over six and a half years (2013)

Half of the moves were not the company’s to make

Of a route that passed through five market names in six and a half years, only two steps — August and December 2013 — were decided by the company itself. The April 2010 move to Osaka JASDAQ and the April 2022 move to Prime were both passive relocations that followed the exchanges’ own restructuring. Precisely because the part it could decide was limited, the preparation for those two steps was made deliberately: a one-for-hundred share split, and ¥2.25m in advisory fees to the auditor.

The effect of the upgrade showed up in the shareholder register sooner than in the share price. Financial institutions’ shareholding moving from 0.8% to 8.2% shows that the listing tier defines the investable universe on the investors’ side. And that same stock was used, in 2021, as ¥80.4bn of merger consideration exactly as it stood. The designation to the First Section was not a move to raise money; it worked as preparation for buying, eight years later, a company not much smaller than itself, using shares alone.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2021

Absorbing Yumeshin in an all-share merger, then retiring both names (2021)

The ¥45.6bn price tag left on the books

Taking in a listed company with ¥58.6bn of revenue without spending a single yen of cash looks like a deft piece of work. But paying in shares is not the same as not paying. Existing shareholders were diluted at a ratio of 0.63, and on top of that the value of the assets acquired did not survive the impairment test three months later. The figure of ¥29.435bn in the construction segment is the result of rewriting, at the same moment, both the outlook for the construction business the company had entered on its own the year before and the outlook for the construction business inherited from Yumeshin.

Even so, the merger itself left numbers behind. Construction turned profitable in the year to June 2022, with ¥36.9bn of revenue and ¥5.3bn of profit, and group revenue grew from ¥98.8bn to ¥187.9bn in four years. The Yumeshin name, running from the 1976 Sato Architectural Design Office, disappeared from the corporate name in January 2023, and the BeNEXT name adopted in 2020 disappeared at the same time. What remained was the goodwill figure — recognized at ¥71.7bn in April 2021 and cut to ¥45.605bn by the year end — and the schedule allocating it across construction, machinery/electrical, IT and overseas.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— Open Up Group full history in Japanese →

  1. Open Up Group Inc. — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports).
  2. Full Japanese edition, with fuller detail and per-decision pages: the-shashi.com/tse/2154/.

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer


Data API

Open Up Group’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/2154/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/2154/history.json History overview
GET /api/2154/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/2154/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/2154/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/2154/executives.json Executives
GET /api/2154/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/2154/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/2154/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/2154/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/2154/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/2154/workforce.json Workforce