The ¥15 billion mammoth dock at Sakai — and the retreat of shipbuilding from Sakurajima (1964)
Not the bet on size, but the folding up of Sakurajima
The core of this investment was not the ¥15 billion committed but the closing of the slipways at the company’s birthplace. The Sakurajima works had been placed at the mouth of the Aji River in 1899 and, together with Innoshima, formed the base of what people called one of Japan’s three great shipyards. The slogan “all our strength to Sakai” was also a declaration that shipbuilding was being pulled out of there. Read together with President Nagata Keisei’s statement that the firm would concentrate on very large ships so as not to be confined within the scale of a mid-sized business, Sakai was a choice that left no line of retreat.
That choice was not, however, rewarded for long. Nagata himself spoke in 1969 of the limits of ever-larger hulls and of concentrating investment in the land-based divisions, and yet the company went on to build the Ariake yard, capable of handling 500,000-deadweight-tonne ships, for ¥42 billion. The reading that had worked at Sakai — that the side which owns the plant is the strong one — inverts the moment demand itself disappears, as it did with the yen revaluation and the oil crisis. The wisdom of capital spending, one might say, is graded not in the year it is made but in the year the demand goes away.
Revenue and net margin, FY1959–FY1969
Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY1964 onwards — after it was taken.
Source: securities reports
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at Kanadevia (Hitachi Zosen)
- 1947 Hikoshima to Mitsubishi, Hitachi’s shares to the liquidation commission — restarting as an independent shipbuilder (1947)
- 1986 Two rationalization plans, and the shrinking of the Innoshima and Mukaishima yards (1986)
- 2001 Spinning off the founding trade and turning into an environmental company (2001)
- 2010 A run of European and Australian environmental-plant acquisitions, and the change of name to Kanadevia (2010)
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
Kanadevia (Hitachi Zosen)’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/7004/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/7004/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/7004/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/7004/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/7004/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/7004/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/7004/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/7004/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/7004/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/7004/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/7004/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/7004/workforce.json | Workforce |