NEC

Merging the semiconductor subsidiary NEC Electronics with Renesas Technology (2009)

Key decision·2009· NEC — the full company history →

The decision to let go of a founding business

At the heart of this decision is the fact that the semiconductors NEC had built for itself through vertical integration were released on the logic of scale. NEC had made everything in-house — from communications equipment to computers to semiconductors — and in the C&C era of fusing computers and communications, those home-grown semiconductors had underpinned the whole company’s strength. The post-Lehman loss made plain that the cost of maintaining that strength had outrun the company’s stamina. The third-place-in-the-world scale that the merger brought was a rational outcome; yet the fact that a founding business which had once contended alone for the world’s top spot now moved to the side that shares it with another company shows the weight of selection and concentration.

That said, whether letting go was the right answer remains hard to judge, even from the years that followed. The Renesas that NEC left behind was rebuilt with public funds and turned into a highly profitable company, keeping the world’s top position in microcontrollers. Whether NEC could have carried that revival had it held the business itself, or whether the two would have gone down together, cannot be known. Now that the reshaping of Japan’s semiconductor industry is once again spoken of as national policy, this merger — which rebound a founding business on the grounds of scale — appears to leave quietly open the question of who should carry a business, and how much of it should be held in-house.

Revenue and net margin, FY2004–FY2014

Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY2009 onwards — after it was taken.

Source: securities reports

Read the full dossier in Japanese →

The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.

Other key decisions at NEC


Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer

  • This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
  • Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
  • Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
  • Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
  • Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.

Data API

NEC’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET. Full specification →

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/6701/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/6701/history.json History overview
GET /api/6701/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/6701/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/6701/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/6701/executives.json Executives
GET /api/6701/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/6701/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/6701/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/6701/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/6701/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/6701/workforce.json Workforce