Buying H&F, maker of very large presses, and Via Mechanics, maker of circuit-board drilling machines (2025)
The same purchase as half a century ago, with the motive reversed
When Amada Isamu brought Yodogawa Press and Sonoike Seisakusho into the fold between 1973 and 1977, what the money bought was land, equipment and people. The calculation was that this was cheaper than building a new plant and productive from the start, and every target was in trouble. The two deals of 2025 point the other way. H&F had sales of ¥20.9bn and Via Mechanics ¥43.3bn in the year to March 2024; neither needed rescuing. What Amada bought was a dimension it lacked — presses above 3,000 tons, and the precision to drill the fine holes of high-end circuit boards.
Whether $459.1M (¥69bn) was the right price cannot yet be judged. In the year to March 2026 sales and orders reached record highs while amortization related to Via Mechanics weighed on operating profit. The takeovers of half a century ago showed their result plainly: clear the accumulated deficit, restore the dividend. Buying a field with cash gives no answer until the fit with Amada’s own laser technology emerges as a product a customer will pay a premium for. The exchange rate at which earning power accumulated in sheet-metal machinery was converted into a ticket to a growth field will not be readable until around the end of the new medium-term plan in fiscal 2030.
Revenue and net margin, FY2020–FY2026
Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY2025 onwards — after it was taken.
Source: securities reports
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at Amada
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
Amada’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/6113/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/6113/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/6113/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6113/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6113/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/6113/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/6113/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/6113/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/6113/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/6113/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/6113/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/6113/workforce.json | Workforce |