From selling machines to selling systems with the processing software inside (1990)
Putting a price on twenty years of collecting
With one sentence — “what we manufacture here is processing software” — the showroom was re-read from a device for drawing crowds into a collection point for machining know-how. Sixty thousand programs on a mainframe, and a hit rate at which 60% of a customer’s requirement could be met by modifying something already on file, are numbers no company could produce without twenty-odd years of direct selling that brought the customers to its own door. The 1990 turn was less the invention of a new business than the act of putting a price on a by-product of the 1965 decision.
At that point, however, software was only a fifth of sales, and the business was still, at its base, selling sheet-metal machines one at a time. Contemporary trade coverage set the near-halving of showroom visitors beside the fact that nine-tenths of the customers were small and mid-sized firms, and judged that in the market for systems Amada would run into rivals whose customers had more resources. Calling software a pillar of earnings would take until the “second founding” of 2003 and beyond. The substance of this turn lies in having begun stockpiling the answer twenty years before the question — what do you sell once the machine itself no longer differentiates you.
Revenue and net margin, FY1985–FY1995
Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY1990 onwards — after it was taken.
Source: securities reports
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at Amada
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
Amada’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/6113/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/6113/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/6113/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6113/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/6113/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/6113/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/6113/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/6113/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/6113/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/6113/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/6113/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/6113/workforce.json | Workforce |