CyberAgent

Ramping up engineer hiring and bringing technology in-house (2006)

Key decision·2006· CyberAgent — the full company history →

Owning technology bred the next business

The meaning of this decision goes beyond immediate server reinforcement. For an ad agency — a sales-led company — to hire engineers itself and entrust the design and operation of its infrastructure to a technology chief was a decision to shift the centre of the company’s capabilities from sales to technology. As symbolised by a design that used MySQL and Oracle for different purposes, bringing things in-house was not merely securing manpower but creating a state in which it could optimise its own services with its own technology. Having decided to own media, it had to own the technology to support it too — the 2004 Ameba choice inevitably summoned this in-housing.

And the technological strength grown in this period did not stop at Ameba alone. An organisation able to design and run large-scale services in-house later became the parent body sending people and know-how into fields where technology decides competitiveness — the Cygames games business, and the ad-tech unit handling ad-delivery technology. The starting point at which CyberAgent, begun as a sales company, came to be recognised as a place for engineers to work also lies in this 2006 turn. Entry into media prompted the in-housing of technology, and that technology in turn bred the next business — the first link of this chain was tied here.

Revenue and net margin, FY2001–FY2011

Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY2006 onwards — after it was taken.

Source: securities reports

Read the full dossier in Japanese →

The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.

Other key decisions at CyberAgent


Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer

  • This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
  • Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
  • Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
  • Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
  • Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.

Data API

CyberAgent’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET. Full specification →

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/4751/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/4751/history.json History overview
GET /api/4751/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/4751/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/4751/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/4751/executives.json Executives
GET /api/4751/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/4751/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/4751/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/4751/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/4751/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/4751/workforce.json Workforce