Consolidating Kojima — a city-and-suburb alliance (2012)
Buying a stalled competitor instead of opening the stores itself
The core of this decision was obtaining, in one share subscription, a suburban and provincial store network that would have been very hard to build alone. For a chain that had grown in front of city stations, accumulating roadside openings from scratch would have cost both time and capital. So it put ¥14.1 billion into Kojima — once the industry’s revenue leader, beaten by Yamada Denki and in need of funds — handing over control and the money for store reform in the same motion. Absorb a competitor sinking in the price war, build scale, and improve bargaining power with manufacturers: this was an acquisition aimed squarely at scale through consolidation.
The integration benefits were called an unknown at the time, but what the decision left behind was not only a store network. Kimura Kazuyoshi, entrusted with Kojima’s rebuild, was invited eight years later to become president of the parent. That the acquired company’s manager ends up leading the buyer shows this was never simply a purchase of stores but an intake of people and management method. How do you connect two different trading areas, city and suburb, through scale and purchasing? As electronics retail entered its competition with online sellers, this was a choice that pulled that question close to hand early.
Revenue and net margin, FY2007–FY2017
Revenue in ¥ bn (bars) and net margin in % (line), for the years around the decision. Shaded columns are FY2012 onwards — after it was taken.
Source: securities reports
Read the full dossier in Japanese →
The Japanese edition carries the complete record of this decision — the situation that forced it, the options weighed, what actually followed, and the sources behind every claim.
Other key decisions at Bic Camera
Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; the revenue chart is shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →
Disclaimer
- This page is provided for general information only and is not investment advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Figures are compiled independently and include our own estimates, approximations and machine-processed data; we make no warranty as to their accuracy or completeness.
- Sources are primarily each company’s securities reports and other public filings, but errors and omissions may remain.
- Any use of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Past performance does not indicate future results.
- Company names, logos and other marks belong to their respective owners.
Data API
Bic Camera’s history, financials, executives and
shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.
Full specification →
| Method | Endpoint | Returns |
|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/companies.json | All companies |
| GET | /api/3048/manifest.json | Resource index |
| GET | /api/3048/history.json | History overview |
| GET | /api/3048/timeline.json | Chronology |
| GET | /api/decisions.json | All management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/3048/decisions.json | Management decisions (index) |
| GET | /api/3048/decisions/{slug}.json | One decision (full dossier) |
| GET | /api/3048/executives.json | Executives |
| GET | /api/3048/shareholders.json | Major shareholders |
| GET | /api/3048/financials.json | Financial statements |
| GET | /api/3048/financials-longterm.json | Long-term results |
| GET | /api/3048/segments.json | Business segments |
| GET | /api/3048/regions.json | Sales by region |
| GET | /api/3048/workforce.json | Workforce |