ITO EN

Company history

Financial history 2002–2025 — revenue, cost structure, balance sheet, cash flow and key ratios, year by year →

Founded
1964
Head office
Tokyo, Japan
Listed
1996
Founder
Honjo Masanori
Revenue · FYE Mar 2025
$3.2B (¥473bn)
Net profit · FYE Mar 2025
$94.9M (¥14bn)
ITO EN: long-term performance & turning pointsSales (revenue) and profit-margin ratio
Sales (¥ bn)Net margin (%)

1964Buying a name, selling packaged leaf

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1964Honjo Masanori founds Nihon Family Service, a food wholesaler
  2. 1966Frontier Seicha established in Shizuoka
  3. 1969Buys the trading name “Ito En” for ¥2,000,000; five employees
  4. 1974Sagara tea factory — leaf processing brought in-house
  5. 1976Number one in packaged tea leaf; tea-garden development programme begins
  6. 1979Exclusive import rights to Fujian oolong tea

ITO EN did not begin in tea. Honjo Masanori, born in Kobe in 1934 and put through Waseda law school by his own wages after his father’s business failed, became the top salesman at a car dealership — 407 cars in a year — and in August 1964 spent the savings on a grocery and seasonings wholesaler, Nihon Family Service. The company counts that year as its founding. The wholesale business failed, but it left a piece of information: of everything the firm handled, the highest margin was on packaged tea leaf. In 1966 the brothers set up Frontier Seicha in Shizuoka, the direct predecessor, and began selling tea to retailers themselves.

The trade would not have them. Every shop already had a supplier, and in an industry that ran on old names a newcomer had nothing to offer. So Honjo bought a name. In May 1969 he paid ¥2,000,000 for the trading name of a long-established Ueno tea house — Ito En — and renamed the company after it. Money had all but run out; the office was a shack ringed by bamboo on the edge of Kawaguchi, Saitama, and the staff numbered five, including his younger brother Honjo Hachiro, who took sales and product development while Masanori took the finances. A ¥40 million bill fraud nearly finished them; in 1970 a ¥5 million investment from Obuchi Keizo, a junior from Waseda newly elected to the Diet, helped keep the company alive.

The weapon was the packet itself. Tea was sold loose by weight, and supermarkets — the rising channel — would not stock leaf that went stale in three days. ITO EN sealed it in aluminium foil, got it onto the shelves, and ran a direct-from-the-growing-region, cash-settled route-sales operation built for volume. Television advertising, an industry first in 1968, carried the name. Just over eleven years after entering the trade, in 1976, it was the leading seller of packaged tea in Japan. It then pushed upstream: a factory at Sagara in Shizuoka in 1974, and from 1976 a programme that turned abandoned farmland into contracted tea gardens — an unheard-of attempt to hold both ends, field and shelf, that would later become the company’s procurement base. A 1977 visit by a Chinese delegation led to an oolong import agreement in 1979 and, with it, the exclusive Japanese rights to Fujian oolong.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1981The drink nobody would pay for

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
  1. 1981Canned oolong tea launched over the board’s objections
  2. 1985World’s first canned sencha, after eight years of development
  3. 1987First overseas subsidiary, in Hawaii
  4. 1988Honjo Hachiro becomes president; sales ¥37.5 billion
  5. 1989Canned sencha renamed Oi Ocha
  6. 1990World’s first green tea in a PET bottle
  7. 1992Shares registered over the counter (JSDA)

At a board meeting early in 1981, ten of ITO EN’s twelve directors voted against launching canned oolong tea. Canned drinks then were sweet — cola, coffee — and no one believed a consumer would pay ¥100 for unsweetened tea they could brew at home for nothing. The two votes in favour were the brothers’. What made the risk bearable was arithmetic rather than conviction: the cans were made under contract, so no plant had to be built, and a total failure would cost about $1.4M (¥300m) a year against roughly ¥400 million of recurring profit the year before. Behind it was a harder fact — household green-tea consumption had been falling since its 1973 peak of 2,024 grams, and a leaf merchant sold nothing through the hot months.

The drink went national in March 1981 in a deliberately black can, aimed at young buyers rather than the summer-drink market. Sales were slow until Suntory entered ten months later and made the category visible; by 1989 more than a hundred makers were in it and the market approached ¥200 billion. ITO EN then turned on its own core product. Green tea had been considered impossible to can — its tannins oxidise and throw off a baked-sweet-potato smell — and it took eight years of work under Hachiro to shut out the oxygen. The world’s first canned sencha launched in February 1985, to open laughter from inside and outside the trade. Renamed Oi Ocha in 1989 after a phrase its own commercials had made famous, and put into the world’s first PET bottle of green tea in 1990, it caught a change in how people lived — cars, working couples, convenience stores — and carried the teapot outdoors.

In 1988 Masanori handed the presidency to his brother and became chairman, answering the obvious criticism by saying he had chosen Hachiro not as a brother but as the subordinate he trusted most. Sales that year were ¥37.5 billion, split four-tenths green tea, four-tenths oolong, two-tenths other drinks: the leaf merchant had become a beverage maker. In May 1992 the shares were registered over the counter with the Japan Securities Dealers Association, twenty-eight years after founding. Joint ventures in Zhejiang and Australia followed in 1994, and a vending-machine operation in which one salesperson both took orders and restocked let the company tune the assortment machine by machine.

Read the full history in Japanese →


1996Listing, and the green-tea war

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2002 · consolidated
Revenue$1.6B
Net income$54M
Net margin3.3%
FY2007 · consolidated
Revenue$2.6B
Net income$104M
Net margin4%
  1. 1996Listed on the TSE second section (first section, 1998)
  2. 2000Kirin’s Nama-cha launches; the “green-tea war” begins
  3. 2000Industry-first hot-only PET bottle, a season early
  4. 2002Founder Honjo Masanori dies
  5. 2006Acquires the Japanese business of Tully’s Coffee
  6. 2007Non-voting Class 1 preferred shares listed on the TSE

ITO EN listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange’s second section in September 1996 and moved to the first section in October 1998, posting record profits for seven straight years to the April 1998 term. What paid for that record was a deliberately light structure: the leaf came from farmers under direct contract and was processed in ITO EN’s own plants, but the brewing and filling — the capital-hungry end — was contracted out to 43 partner factories across the country, saving both freight from a central plant and the investment in one. “Raw material and technology are our core,” Hachiro said, and everything else was rented, entered lightly and exited fast.

The challenge came from a competitor with no history in tea. Kirin Beverage’s Nama-cha, launched in March 2000 on a fresh, cool flavour profile and a star-led campaign, hit its first-year target in three and a half months; other soft-drink majors followed, and by May 2001 ITO EN’s share of the seven-major green-tea market had fallen from above 40% to under 30%. Hachiro admitted to a level of alarm he had not felt before, and read the attacker’s weakness correctly: a drink sold on coolness would fade in winter. In October 2000 the company brought forward by a full season the industry’s first hot-only PET bottle, screening 300 leaf varieties for ones that would not develop an off-smell when heated, and installed free heated cases in retailers until more than 50,000 stores carried them by the end of 2003. Seasonal editions from 2001 and region-specific blends from 2003 followed, and share returned to the 40s. The procurement network — roughly 30,000 growers supplying crude tea — was what made that speed of variety possible.

With the core recovered, the company widened. Canned coffee arrived in 2003 and the vegetable drink Ichinichibun no Yasai in 2004, both still made under the founding rule of no added flavourings or seasonings. Consolidated sales rose from ¥204.7 billion in the April 2002 term to ¥310.2 billion in April 2007. In October 2006 ITO EN bought the operator of Tully’s Coffee in Japan, taking a café chain rather than building one, and in September 2007 listed non-voting Class 1 preferred shares on the first section — a rare piece of Japanese capital policy that raised equity without issuing a single new vote.

Read the full history in Japanese →


2008Toward a world tea company

Revenue (¥ bn, bars) · net margin (%, line)
Source: securities reports
FY2008 · consolidated
Revenue$3.2B
Net income$98M
Net margin3.1%
FY2025 · consolidated
Revenue$3.2B
Net income$95M
Net margin3%
  1. 2008Honjo Daisuke becomes president
  2. 2011Acquires the dairy Chichiyasu (2012: the vending operator Neos)
  3. 2013Long-term vision: “the world’s tea company”
  4. 2015Acquires Distant Lands Trading Co. in the United States
  5. 2019Oi Ocha certified a Guinness World Record; sales ¥504.2 billion
  6. 2022Moves to the TSE Prime Market
  7. 2025Group restructuring announced

Honjo Daisuke, the third of the family to lead the company, became president in 2008 and met the financial crisis at once: recurring profit for the April 2009 term fell to ¥10.4 billion from ¥18.2 billion. With the domestic drinks market mature, ITO EN bought its way into adjacent channels — a mineral-water joint venture with Itochu in 2008, the Hiroshima dairy Chichiyasu in 2011, the vending-machine operator Neos in 2012 — adding milk products and a machine network that did not depend on tea. Consolidated sales passed ¥400 billion in the April 2013 term, but operating margins stayed below those of the food majors, and profitability remained the group’s standing problem.

The stated ambition, from a 2013 medium-term plan, was to become a world tea company. A regional holding company in Singapore (2012) was followed by ventures across Southeast Asia, and in February 2015 by the purchase of Distant Lands Trading Co., a US coffee and tea roaster, which added ¥11.8 billion of goodwill. At home a dedicated matcha plant and a new Kobe factory opened in 2016. In May 2019 Oi Ocha was certified by Guinness World Records as the best-selling natural healthy RTD green tea in the world, thirty years after the brand took its name; sales that year reached ¥504.2 billion — the ¥500 billion the company had once promised for 2012, arriving seven years late.

COVID-19 struck exactly where the group was exposed, in vending machines and cafés: sales fell to ¥446.3 billion by the April 2021 term and the food-service segment went to an operating loss. Price rises and returning footfall brought operating profit back to ¥25.0 billion in the April 2024 term. For its sixtieth anniversary the company set a five-year plan to April 2029 aiming at a parent operating margin above 8.5% and the globalisation of the Oi Ocha brand, opening subsidiaries in Germany and Vietnam in 2024 and announcing a group restructuring in June 2025 that folds the vending business into Neos and consolidates regional units. The tea-garden programme begun in 1976 now underpins one of Japan’s largest leaf-procurement networks — the upstream half of a company that spent sixty years persuading the world to buy what it could have made at home.

Read the full history in Japanese →


Key decisions — the author’s view

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY1981

From exclusive oolong imports to canned tea: entering drinks with no sugar (1981)

Perhaps it was never a product everyone would approve of

What stands out in this decision is that President Honjo Masanori has admitted he privately thought the thing could not possibly sell. He did not push it through out of conviction: the competitive necessity of having a product the majors did not have, and a ceiling on the loss — at worst about $1.4M (¥300m), because production was contracted out — filled in for the conviction he lacked. Judging a new business not by its chances of success but by how deep the wound would be if it failed can be read as one of the few forms of attack available to a newcomer without capital.

The moment when the founder-president backed down over the colour of the can has the same character. Admitting that the buyer lay outside his own understanding, he handed the judgement to younger instincts inside the company — an unusual thing in an owner-run firm. A new product everyone supports never becomes a big hit, Masanori later reflected. That ten of twelve directors were against it was evidence of a high probability of failure and, at the same time, evidence that the product stood far enough from the common sense of its day. How to measure that distance is a question companies launching new products still carry.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2006

Taking control of Tully’s Coffee Japan by acquiring Food X Globe (2006)

Did it buy the stores, or the time?

Read as a tea company straying into food service, this acquisition is misread. Even in green-tea drinks, ITO EN made the product first and then built the distribution and production machinery — vending machines, partner factories — with its own hands. Coffee alone skipped that sequence: it acquired a finished operating company outright. The calculation appears to have been that carrying a brand already established in stores over to the drinks shelf was faster than fighting the majors head-on in canned coffee.

Nor should the seller’s side be overlooked — a listed company whose founder no longer held control. Matsuda Kota chose ITO EN not on price alone but on whether the buyer would keep growing the business. Measuring an acquisition only by price or ratio cannot capture that kind of judgement. That ITO EN carried the fixed costs of a footfall-dependent business through the pandemic and did not let go, returning it to a record profit, is one answer to the question of how far the buyer lived up to the seller’s reading.

Revenue (¥ bn) · net margin % · around FY2007

Listing non-voting Class 1 preferred shares on the Tokyo Stock Exchange (2007)

Can a price be put on a vote?

This capital policy is an instance of a listed founding-family company confronting, as a matter of instrument design, the tension between wanting money and not wanting to hand out votes. The purposes ITO EN itself gave were widening its funding options and offering shareholders a new investment vehicle; it did not cite the preservation of control. Even so, since the mechanism thickened equity without adding a single voting share, it plainly sat comfortably alongside a structure in which the founding family continues to run the company.

The market’s answer differed from the designer’s expectation. Even with a dividend 25% higher, a thinly traded share is valued 20% to 40% below the ordinary stock. A security created as an experiment in pricing the vote ended up, one might say, pricing liquidity instead. Raising money through non-voting shares is a question that recurs in debates on corporate capital policy in Japan; the price history of this issue, which ITO EN has now carried for close to twenty years, leaves that debate a concrete piece of evidence.

Each heading links to the full Japanese analysis — background, decision and outcome, with sources.


References & sources

This is a condensed English edition. The full, source-by-source history — with the detailed narrative, financial tables, shareholders and executives — is maintained in Japanese: 日本語版(詳細)— ITO EN full history in Japanese →

  1. ITO EN, Ltd. — 有価証券報告書 (annual securities reports).
  2. ITO EN, Ltd. — IR disclosures: annual reports, fact books and earnings materials (決算説明資料).
  3. Full Japanese edition, with sources and detail: the-shashi.com/tse/2593.

Yen amounts are converted at the average rate of each figure’s own year — not today’s rate; revenue charts are shown in yen. Exchange rates & sources — the full ¥/US$ table →


Disclaimer


Data API

ITO EN’s history, financials, executives and shareholders are published as static JSON — no key, plain GET.

Method Endpoint Returns
GET /api/companies.json All companies
GET /api/2593/manifest.json Resource index
GET /api/2593/history.json History overview
GET /api/2593/timeline.json Chronology
GET /api/decisions.json All management decisions (index)
GET /api/2593/decisions.json Management decisions (index)
GET /api/2593/decisions/{slug}.json One decision (full dossier)
GET /api/2593/executives.json Executives
GET /api/2593/shareholders.json Major shareholders
GET /api/2593/financials.json Financial statements
GET /api/2593/financials-longterm.json Long-term results
GET /api/2593/segments.json Business segments
GET /api/2593/regions.json Sales by region
GET /api/2593/workforce.json Workforce